I think a lot more folks will start showing up Saturday afternoon after the LSAT. We just might have to go off topic in order to get this goin though because it's been pretty lame in here for a few monthsbrinicolec wrote:I want it to be poppin this year too! Lol
URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- USayinBoalt

- Posts: 1614
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:40 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
- PrezRand

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Thread started in July. We are now on page 14 and it is nearly December. In comparison to the URM 2015-2016 thread, page 14 was in October. Is it possible that a bunch of TLS URMs are sitting this cycle out?
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
That's true. I keep forgetting the next LSAT is so soon. I think a lot of people are either in LSAT land or like me, telling themselves that checking status checkers every hour isn't going to change how quickly you hear backUSayinBoalt wrote:I think a lot more folks will start showing up Saturday afternoon after the LSAT. We just might have to go off topic in order to get this goin though because it's been pretty lame in here for a few monthsbrinicolec wrote:I want it to be poppin this year too! Lol
-
20171lhopeful

- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:12 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
yeah, as the OP i was there was more activity on this page too
to add to a previous poster, here's my cycle thus far--
in at NYU, GW, and UCLA
3.4,160
I'm outperforming my numbers so I'm pretty stoked.
to add to a previous poster, here's my cycle thus far--
in at NYU, GW, and UCLA
3.4,160
I'm outperforming my numbers so I'm pretty stoked.
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Hm, I'm not really sure. Wish there was a way to know. Hopefully it's not a sign URM apps as a whole are going to be down. I really want to see more minorities in the legal profession!PrezRand wrote:Thread started in July. We are now on page 14 and it is nearly December. In comparison to the URM 2015-2016 thread, page 14 was in October. Is it possible that a bunch of TLS URMs are sitting this cycle out?
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Wowowow. That's super awesome.20171lhopeful wrote:yeah, as the OP i was there was more activity on this page too![]()
to add to a previous poster, here's my cycle thus far--
in at NYU, GW, and UCLA
3.4,160
I'm outperforming my numbers so I'm pretty stoked.
I have a similar GPA to you and a higher LSAT and have been freaking out about NYU because it's my top choice.
What do you think has been bringing your app over the edge?
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Side note: Any of you guys planning on applying to SEO?
-
20171lhopeful

- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:12 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I'm almost 6 years out of undergrad, and I'm PI focused. I also worked on my apps for 10 months. I had to make sure everything else about my apps was stellar since my numbers weren't.brinicolec wrote:Wowowow. That's super awesome.20171lhopeful wrote:yeah, as the OP i was there was more activity on this page too![]()
to add to a previous poster, here's my cycle thus far--
in at NYU, GW, and UCLA
3.4,160
I'm outperforming my numbers so I'm pretty stoked.
I have a similar GPA to you and a higher LSAT and have been freaking out about NYU because it's my top choice.
What do you think has been bringing your app over the edge?
-
20171lhopeful

- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:12 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
also, are people sending thank yous after interviews? I finished a couple this week and I'm not sure if that's a thing or not...I can't find my interviewer's email
- dietcoke1

- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Yes, working on the scholarship essay but haven't had the motivation to finish it.brinicolec wrote:Side note: Any of you guys planning on applying to SEO?
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Ah. I wonder how much the WE boosted your app... I know a lot of the schools like to see that. Either way, congrats! Any news on $$$ for you yet?20171lhopeful wrote:I'm almost 6 years out of undergrad, and I'm PI focused. I also worked on my apps for 10 months. I had to make sure everything else about my apps was stellar since my numbers weren't.brinicolec wrote:Wowowow. That's super awesome.20171lhopeful wrote:yeah, as the OP i was there was more activity on this page too![]()
to add to a previous poster, here's my cycle thus far--
in at NYU, GW, and UCLA
3.4,160
I'm outperforming my numbers so I'm pretty stoked.
I have a similar GPA to you and a higher LSAT and have been freaking out about NYU because it's my top choice.
What do you think has been bringing your app over the edge?
- dietcoke1

- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
yes, I would. but a handwritten one.20171lhopeful wrote:also, are people sending thank yous after interviews? I finished a couple this week and I'm not sure if that's a thing or not...I can't find my interviewer's email
- PrezRand

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Congrats!20171lhopeful wrote:yeah, as the OP i was there was more activity on this page too![]()
to add to a previous poster, here's my cycle thus far--
in at NYU, GW, and UCLA
3.4,160
I'm outperforming my numbers so I'm pretty stoked.
Considering it for next cycle, but I would rather extend my vacation timebrinicolec wrote:Side note: Any of you guys planning on applying to SEO?
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I haven't seen anything insisting it's a necessary thing to do.20171lhopeful wrote:also, are people sending thank yous after interviews? I finished a couple this week and I'm not sure if that's a thing or not...I can't find my interviewer's email
I saw one poster who said for alumni interviews, it's okay but they probably won't ding you for not doing it but for adcomm, don't bother because "it's their job."
I haven't interviewed at all yet (need to do my N'Western internet interview tomorrow) so I haven't really decided how I feel.
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I've been dreading trying to track down all my transcript stuff again. Think I might just do the two UGs I attended and then see if they want the transcripts for the CCs I took classes at during HS and stuff...dietcoke1 wrote:Yes, working on the scholarship essay but haven't had the motivation to finish it.brinicolec wrote:Side note: Any of you guys planning on applying to SEO?
Haven't even looked at the scholarship essay prompt yet. Probably should soon since I seem to have written myself out of my writer's block that led to me submitting apps mid-Nov. rather than right after getting my Sept. LSAT score
-
20171lhopeful

- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:12 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I know it boosted mine alot haha. I had positions at 2 big named places (IMO) and I'm currently working abroad. Happy to be more specific over PMbrinicolec wrote:Ah. I wonder how much the WE boosted your app... I know a lot of the schools like to see that. Either way, congrats! Any news on $$$ for you yet?20171lhopeful wrote:I'm almost 6 years out of undergrad, and I'm PI focused. I also worked on my apps for 10 months. I had to make sure everything else about my apps was stellar since my numbers weren't.brinicolec wrote:Wowowow. That's super awesome.20171lhopeful wrote:yeah, as the OP i was there was more activity on this page too![]()
to add to a previous poster, here's my cycle thus far--
in at NYU, GW, and UCLA
3.4,160
I'm outperforming my numbers so I'm pretty stoked.
I have a similar GPA to you and a higher LSAT and have been freaking out about NYU because it's my top choice.
What do you think has been bringing your app over the edge?
No money yet but I applied for the scholarships at NYU so fingers crossed
- dietcoke1

- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
yea the application is not fun. you also have to do a resume that you have to format specifically to how they want it. its not terrible but just something I'm lacking motivation for after all those school apps.brinicolec wrote:I've been dreading trying to track down all my transcript stuff again. Think I might just do the two UGs I attended and then see if they want the transcripts for the CCs I took classes at during HS and stuff...dietcoke1 wrote:Yes, working on the scholarship essay but haven't had the motivation to finish it.brinicolec wrote:Side note: Any of you guys planning on applying to SEO?
Haven't even looked at the scholarship essay prompt yet. Probably should soon since I seem to have written myself out of my writer's block that led to me submitting apps mid-Nov. rather than right after getting my Sept. LSAT score
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I've started that (maybe even finished, I don't remember)! It's currently my only Word document open. It seemed like one of the easier things to do since it's just plugging in info.dietcoke1 wrote:yea the application is not fun. you also have to do a resume that you have to format specifically to how they want it. its not terrible but just something I'm lacking motivation for after all those school apps.brinicolec wrote:I've been dreading trying to track down all my transcript stuff again. Think I might just do the two UGs I attended and then see if they want the transcripts for the CCs I took classes at during HS and stuff...dietcoke1 wrote:Yes, working on the scholarship essay but haven't had the motivation to finish it.brinicolec wrote:Side note: Any of you guys planning on applying to SEO?
Haven't even looked at the scholarship essay prompt yet. Probably should soon since I seem to have written myself out of my writer's block that led to me submitting apps mid-Nov. rather than right after getting my Sept. LSAT score
- PrezRand

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I am definitely a critic of some forms of affirmative action but this quote is very depressing:
""7,789 law school applicants who had both LSAT scores of 165 or above and UGPA of 3.5 or above. Of that number, just 63 were black. Only 236 were Hispanic or Puerto Rican."
""7,789 law school applicants who had both LSAT scores of 165 or above and UGPA of 3.5 or above. Of that number, just 63 were black. Only 236 were Hispanic or Puerto Rican."
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I'm not included in the 63PrezRand wrote:I am definitely a critic of some forms of affirmative action but this quote is very depressing:
""7,789 law school applicants who had both LSAT scores of 165 or above and UGPA of 3.5 or above. Of that number, just 63 were black. Only 236 were Hispanic or Puerto Rican."
But yeah, I mean, standardized testing can leave much to be desired. LSAT prep material is really expensive too for lower-class folks of any race.
- PrezRand

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
True, but I think I'm making solid progress and I'm only using the PTs. The cost was about 100brinicolec wrote:I'm not included in the 63PrezRand wrote:I am definitely a critic of some forms of affirmative action but this quote is very depressing:
""7,789 law school applicants who had both LSAT scores of 165 or above and UGPA of 3.5 or above. Of that number, just 63 were black. Only 236 were Hispanic or Puerto Rican."![]()
But yeah, I mean, standardized testing can leave much to be desired. LSAT prep material is really expensive too for lower-class folks of any race.
- USayinBoalt

- Posts: 1614
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:40 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
the numbers are pretty sad. I always look at the breakdown of the class composition of each school on the NALP website and Stanford only had 4 black men in their most recent 1L class; that's up from 3 the previous yearPrezRand wrote:True, but I think I'm making solid progress and I'm only using the PTs. The cost was about 100brinicolec wrote:I'm not included in the 63PrezRand wrote:I am definitely a critic of some forms of affirmative action but this quote is very depressing:
""7,789 law school applicants who had both LSAT scores of 165 or above and UGPA of 3.5 or above. Of that number, just 63 were black. Only 236 were Hispanic or Puerto Rican."![]()
But yeah, I mean, standardized testing can leave much to be desired. LSAT prep material is really expensive too for lower-class folks of any race.
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
That's good then. But if you ever wanted prep books like the Trainer or anything, those things add up quickly.PrezRand wrote:True, but I think I'm making solid progress and I'm only using the PTs. The cost was about 100
Yeah, that's really awful. Hopefully the increase is a good sign?USayinBoalt wrote:the numbers are pretty sad. I always look at the breakdown of the class composition of each school on the NALP website and Stanford only had 4 black men in their most recent 1L class; that's up from 3 the previous year
- poptart123

- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Where is this quote from? Not that I don't trust you, I just want to read over the study/whatever it's from out of interest.PrezRand wrote:I am definitely a critic of some forms of affirmative action but this quote is very depressing:
""7,789 law school applicants who had both LSAT scores of 165 or above and UGPA of 3.5 or above. Of that number, just 63 were black. Only 236 were Hispanic or Puerto Rican."
- dietcoke1

- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I think its in the brief for the University of Michigan Supreme court case about affirmative action.poptart123 wrote:Where is this quote from? Not that I don't trust you, I just want to read over the study/whatever it's from out of interest.PrezRand wrote:I am definitely a critic of some forms of affirmative action but this quote is very depressing:
""7,789 law school applicants who had both LSAT scores of 165 or above and UGPA of 3.5 or above. Of that number, just 63 were black. Only 236 were Hispanic or Puerto Rican."