D Brooks wrote:
DBrooks you have issues

D Brooks wrote:
Not true. I thought intangibles mattered more for URMsD Brooks wrote:UGH... not at alllisjjen wrote: Furthermore, how much does an upwards grade trend matter?
I actually felt what they were saying was quite optimistic myself. I'm going to apply ED to GULC, just because I've always Always ALWAYS wanted to go there. I got an invite so I hope that's a good sign. Otherwise, I'm going to stick to the Penn St (70's) to University of Minnesota- Twin Cities (20's) range.tkgrrett wrote:Have you people lost your mind??? 3.45/161= good shot at CCN??? Stop getting OPs hopes up. I know plenty of AAs with better numbers (3.4-3.5x/163-165) completely shut out of T14s. Those people who get in with 3.2x/155-163 are exceptions. Most of them 1)went to ivy league schools(kicking myself for not doing this) and/or 2)have ridiculous work/community experience.
With those numbers OP should be looking at schools in the 25-50 range as targets with a cornell and wustl plus a few others in the 10-25 range being high reaches.
ehh be careful about ED.. I have a friend who just signed promissory notes for ~65k at one of UCLA/UT/Vandy and he is pretty scared to put it gently.lisjjen wrote:I actually felt what they were saying was quite optimistic myself. I'm going to apply ED to GULC, just because I've always Always ALWAYS wanted to go there. I got an invite so I hope that's a good sign. Otherwise, I'm going to stick to the Penn St (70's) to University of Minnesota- Twin Cities (20's) range.tkgrrett wrote:Have you people lost your mind??? 3.45/161= good shot at CCN??? Stop getting OPs hopes up. I know plenty of AAs with better numbers (3.4-3.5x/163-165) completely shut out of T14s. Those people who get in with 3.2x/155-163 are exceptions. Most of them 1)went to ivy league schools(kicking myself for not doing this) and/or 2)have ridiculous work/community experience.
With those numbers OP should be looking at schools in the 25-50 range as targets with a cornell and wustl plus a few others in the 10-25 range being high reaches.
don't do any of this.lisjjen wrote:I actually felt what they were saying was quite optimistic myself. I'm going to apply ED to GULC, just because I've always Always ALWAYS wanted to go there. I got an invite so I hope that's a good sign. Otherwise, I'm going to stick to the Penn St (70's) to University of Minnesota- Twin Cities (20's) range.tkgrrett wrote:Have you people lost your mind??? 3.45/161= good shot at CCN??? Stop getting OPs hopes up. I know plenty of AAs with better numbers (3.4-3.5x/163-165) completely shut out of T14s. Those people who get in with 3.2x/155-163 are exceptions. Most of them 1)went to ivy league schools(kicking myself for not doing this) and/or 2)have ridiculous work/community experience.
With those numbers OP should be looking at schools in the 25-50 range as targets with a cornell and wustl plus a few others in the 10-25 range being high reaches.
Thanks for the vagueness. What are you recommending? Apply BELOW the 70's. Even if I wasn't URM and didn't have some pretty groovy softs, I would still have a shot at the bottom tier ones.let/them/eat/cake wrote:don't do any of this.lisjjen wrote:I actually felt what they were saying was quite optimistic myself. I'm going to apply ED to GULC, just because I've always Always ALWAYS wanted to go there. I got an invite so I hope that's a good sign. Otherwise, I'm going to stick to the Penn St (70's) to University of Minnesota- Twin Cities (20's) range.tkgrrett wrote:Have you people lost your mind??? 3.45/161= good shot at CCN??? Stop getting OPs hopes up. I know plenty of AAs with better numbers (3.4-3.5x/163-165) completely shut out of T14s. Those people who get in with 3.2x/155-163 are exceptions. Most of them 1)went to ivy league schools(kicking myself for not doing this) and/or 2)have ridiculous work/community experience.
With those numbers OP should be looking at schools in the 25-50 range as targets with a cornell and wustl plus a few others in the 10-25 range being high reaches.
65k IS a lot. I definitely get that. Which is why a put this post up to try and get other people's thoughts. Realistically though, it's difficult for me to explain how much I really want to go to GULC.tkgrrett wrote:ehh be careful about ED.. I have a friend who just signed promissory notes for ~65k at one of UCLA/UT/Vandy and he is pretty scared to put it gently.lisjjen wrote:I actually felt what they were saying was quite optimistic myself. I'm going to apply ED to GULC, just because I've always Always ALWAYS wanted to go there. I got an invite so I hope that's a good sign. Otherwise, I'm going to stick to the Penn St (70's) to University of Minnesota- Twin Cities (20's) range.tkgrrett wrote:Have you people lost your mind??? 3.45/161= good shot at CCN??? Stop getting OPs hopes up. I know plenty of AAs with better numbers (3.4-3.5x/163-165) completely shut out of T14s. Those people who get in with 3.2x/155-163 are exceptions. Most of them 1)went to ivy league schools(kicking myself for not doing this) and/or 2)have ridiculous work/community experience.
With those numbers OP should be looking at schools in the 25-50 range as targets with a cornell and wustl plus a few others in the 10-25 range being high reaches.
Agreed. Don't do this. Apply to better schools. Penn State? ED to GULC when you are almost certainly in there? NO and NO.let/them/eat/cake wrote:don't do any of this.lisjjen wrote:I actually felt what they were saying was quite optimistic myself. I'm going to apply ED to GULC, just because I've always Always ALWAYS wanted to go there. I got an invite so I hope that's a good sign. Otherwise, I'm going to stick to the Penn St (70's) to University of Minnesota- Twin Cities (20's) range.tkgrrett wrote:Have you people lost your mind??? 3.45/161= good shot at CCN??? Stop getting OPs hopes up. I know plenty of AAs with better numbers (3.4-3.5x/163-165) completely shut out of T14s. Those people who get in with 3.2x/155-163 are exceptions. Most of them 1)went to ivy league schools(kicking myself for not doing this) and/or 2)have ridiculous work/community experience.
With those numbers OP should be looking at schools in the 25-50 range as targets with a cornell and wustl plus a few others in the 10-25 range being high reaches.
Exactly. Sure I'm black, but I'm not from the ghetto.Total Litigator wrote:To the OP who doesn't want to risk apply any higher than Georgetown... Lawschoolnumbers.com also has a URM at Cornell with a 3.3 GPA and a 152 LSAT, a URM at Penn with 155/3.49 at Berkeley with 149/3.61, at NYU with a 148/2.9, etc. (I must be same at the rest of the T14).
However, the caveat is that URM's with OP's numbers Have been rejected from those same schools. Basically write great PS's get great rec's and boom, you have an Ivy League education.
Easy. Tier 2 is a little rough. I could get into your University of Utah's and such that hang out at the bottom of the Tier 1.Total Litigator wrote:It seems like a crapshoot... If you are a URM with a compelling story you might have a chance anywhere. Law school numbers has a URM accepted at Harvard with a 155 LSAT and a 3.1 GPA. On the other hand a URM was rejected from Harvard with a 165 and a 3.65.
At Georgetown on LSN.com there are quite a few URM's with your numbers.
It seems like quite the crapshoot... It seems that it wouldn't be too optimistic to say that if you peppered the T14 you should get in at least one place somewhere...
I never knew the bumps helped this much... I know I haven't lived my life dealing with racism and oppression and everything but... I'm a little jealous of anyone who can get into a T14 with T2 numbers...
Stop right there. That's all the adcomms need to hear.lisjjen wrote:
Exactly. SureI'm blackbut I'm not from the ghetto.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I am curious where you got this figure.thechee wrote:A 161 is considerably above the 99th percentile for black applicants. Your score will open plenty of doors for you. I say apply to Columbia on down. MAYBE a few safeties in the 15-20 range, but I wouldn't at all be surprised by an acceptance w/ $ in the T10.
I do disagree.. this number was pulled out of the air.r2b2ct wrote:I don't necessarily disagree, but I am curious where you got this figure.thechee wrote:A 161 is considerably above the 99th percentile for black applicants. Your score will open plenty of doors for you. I say apply to Columbia on down. MAYBE a few safeties in the 15-20 range, but I wouldn't at all be surprised by an acceptance w/ $ in the T10.
+1. How does one end up considerably above the 99th percentile, in any case?tkgrrett wrote:I do disagree.. this number was pulled out of the air.r2b2ct wrote:I don't necessarily disagree, but I am curious where you got this figure.thechee wrote:A 161 is considerably above the 99th percentile for black applicants. Your score will open plenty of doors for you. I say apply to Columbia on down. MAYBE a few safeties in the 15-20 range, but I wouldn't at all be surprised by an acceptance w/ $ in the T10.
tkgrrett wrote:I do disagree.. this number was pulled out of the air.r2b2ct wrote:I don't necessarily disagree, but I am curious where you got this figure.thechee wrote:A 161 is considerably above the 99th percentile for black applicants. Your score will open plenty of doors for you. I say apply to Columbia on down. MAYBE a few safeties in the 15-20 range, but I wouldn't at all be surprised by an acceptance w/ $ in the T10.
I know you're trying to be encouraging but think about what you're saying. You're making it sound like black people are effing retarded. I guarantee there's plenty of black folks with LSAT's above 161. If what you say is true a) I'm smarter than every Colin Powell, Condaleezza Rice, Barack Obama, Thurgood Marshall etc. out there and b) I could EASILY get into Yale if this is the best they are able to get. I'm not comfortable with either of those conclusions.thechee wrote:A 161 is considerably above the 99th percentile for black applicants. Your score will open plenty of doors for you. I say apply to Columbia on down. MAYBE a few safeties in the 15-20 range, but I wouldn't at all be surprised by an acceptance w/ $ in the T10.
99% may be wrong, but your score is still very high for an African-American male (probably awfully darn close... 161 is about 85% for all applicants). You may be uncomfortable with that, but it is the truth.lisjjen wrote:I know you're trying to be encouraging but think about what you're saying. You're making it sound like black people are effing retarded. I guarantee there's plenty of black folks with LSAT's above 161. If what you say is true a) I'm smarter than every Colin Powell, Condaleezza Rice, Barack Obama, Thurgood Marshall etc. out there and b) I could EASILY get into Yale if this is the best they are able to get. I'm not comfortable with either of those conclusions.thechee wrote:A 161 is considerably above the 99th percentile for black applicants. Your score will open plenty of doors for you. I say apply to Columbia on down. MAYBE a few safeties in the 15-20 range, but I wouldn't at all be surprised by an acceptance w/ $ in the T10.