geez, some people go to a lot of trouble to try to make themselves feel betterapplelover wrote:mandyjay11 wrote:yeah there are going to be a lot more JS1's where those came from, so the haters should prepare themselves...
i'm not applying but i know some of yall are lol
Yea what's funny is that one person went through my post history and found a post with my LSAT score and then said that since it wasn't good enough I must have had some other factors to offset it or been a high demand URM. They asked me a bunch of rhetorical questions that they then answered later in the message.
URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
-
mandyjay11

- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
wow... what year is he? and stats please...lemons wrote:yep, all except NYU and northwestern, cause he wasn't interested in those two at all.californiauser wrote:Seriously? did he blanket T14?lemons wrote:my brother is going to chicago at basically sticker ($5K/year). but he had a weird cycle and got rejected and waitlisted from a ton of schools. it was between chicago, irvine, and wisconsin for him.applelover wrote:would anyone go to CCN at sticker?
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
162/3.68 He was actually super surprised he got into Chicago but didn't expect all the waitlists and rejections from the lower T-14. His cycle is making me worried, but I think it also has to do with the fact that we are MA, which I heard is also hard to predictJohn_rizzy_rawls wrote: That is a weird cycle. Stats?
- John_rizzy_rawls

- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
It is a bit more unpredictable. Still though, Chicago is an amazing outcome. Congrats for him and best of luck to you.lemons wrote:162/3.68 He was actually super surprised he got into Chicago but didn't expect all the waitlists and rejections from the lower T-14. His cycle is making me worried, but I think it also has to do with the fact that we are MA, which I heard is also hard to predictJohn_rizzy_rawls wrote: That is a weird cycle. Stats?
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
John_rizzy_rawls wrote:That is a weird cycle. Stats?lemons wrote:yep, all except NYU and northwestern, cause he wasn't interested in those two at all.californiauser wrote:Seriously? did he blanket T14?lemons wrote:
my brother is going to chicago at basically sticker ($5K/year). but he had a weird cycle and got rejected and waitlisted from a ton of schools. it was between chicago, irvine, and wisconsin for him.
What year did he apply?
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
What happened to the PW tonight?
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Thanks, my family is super proud of himJohn_rizzy_rawls wrote: It is a bit more unpredictable. Still though, Chicago is an amazing outcome. Congrats for him and best of luck to you.
Last year..he's a 1L right nowapplelover wrote:
What year did he apply?
- toshiroh

- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:58 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Just finished PT60, 167.
So pissed at my LG score. I knew exactly what I was doing on that damn much game and second guessed myself and ended up wasting valuable time. -3 on the last game. sigh....
Anyway, for those who might need some motivation in studying. My initial diagnostic was a 137, it's possible.
So pissed at my LG score. I knew exactly what I was doing on that damn much game and second guessed myself and ended up wasting valuable time. -3 on the last game. sigh....
Anyway, for those who might need some motivation in studying. My initial diagnostic was a 137, it's possible.
-
mandyjay11

- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
oh yes that was supposed to happenapplelover wrote:What happened to the PW tonight?
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
haha no one is online right now. i'm in the library so i don't have any pics to postapplelover wrote:What happened to the PW tonight?
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Aww .. Maybe tomorrow !lemons wrote:haha no one is online right now. i'm in the library so i don't have any pics to postapplelover wrote:What happened to the PW tonight?
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Wow congratulations on the improvement!toshiroh wrote:Just finished PT60, 167.
So pissed at my LG score. I knew exactly what I was doing on that damn much game and second guessed myself and ended up wasting valuable time. -3 on the last game. sigh....
Anyway, for those who might need some motivation in studying. My initial diagnostic was a 137, it's possible.
- Dr.Zer0

- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
[redacted]
Last edited by Dr.Zer0 on Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Fine they can be in English!Dr.Zer0 wrote:Disculpame, no sabia que nuestros intercambios no mas podian ser echos en esapañol.applelover wrote:Cero! No dijiste en espanol pero gracias guapo.
La proxima vez no mas refiere los a este video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR8ibDVefHMapplelover wrote:Since I posted about my JS 1, I have received several pms. Some were nice where people just asked my stats to figure out how the cycle is going and others where people question how on earth I got one, in attempt to make me feel like 1. I am not a qualified candidate or 2. That I only got one because I'm a urm. I will not be responding to the latter.
And thank you!
-
hernanmi

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:51 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Whoa. That's amazing! Did he have some crazy softs?lemons wrote:162/3.68 He was actually super surprised he got into Chicago but didn't expect all the waitlists and rejections from the lower T-14. His cycle is making me worried, but I think it also has to do with the fact that we are MA, which I heard is also hard to predictJohn_rizzy_rawls wrote: That is a weird cycle. Stats?
- toshiroh

- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:58 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Thanks. I need to break 170 though.... hopefully I can!!applelover wrote:Wow congratulations on the improvement!toshiroh wrote:Just finished PT60, 167.
So pissed at my LG score. I knew exactly what I was doing on that damn much game and second guessed myself and ended up wasting valuable time. -3 on the last game. sigh....
Anyway, for those who might need some motivation in studying. My initial diagnostic was a 137, it's possible.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
If you're PTing that high now I definitely think you can go up three more points in three weeks. Some of my biggest score improvements came in the final weeks of studying.
- Mojosodope

- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Is that Donald as your Avi?toshiroh wrote:Thanks. I need to break 170 though.... hopefully I can!!applelover wrote:Wow congratulations on the improvement!toshiroh wrote:Just finished PT60, 167.
So pissed at my LG score. I knew exactly what I was doing on that damn much game and second guessed myself and ended up wasting valuable time. -3 on the last game. sigh....
Anyway, for those who might need some motivation in studying. My initial diagnostic was a 137, it's possible.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Donald?Mojosodope wrote:Is that Donald as your Avi?toshiroh wrote:Thanks. I need to break 170 though.... hopefully I can!!applelover wrote:Wow congratulations on the improvement!toshiroh wrote:Just finished PT60, 167.
So pissed at my LG score. I knew exactly what I was doing on that damn much game and second guessed myself and ended up wasting valuable time. -3 on the last game. sigh....
Anyway, for those who might need some motivation in studying. My initial diagnostic was a 137, it's possible.
- Mojosodope

- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
donald glover aka childish gambinoapplelover wrote:Donald?Mojosodope wrote:Is that Donald as your Avi?toshiroh wrote:Thanks. I need to break 170 though.... hopefully I can!!applelover wrote:
Wow congratulations on the improvement!
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Never heard of him.
-
mandyjay11

- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
ok guys, so who is going to kick off that spreadsheet? Are we noting app submit/review/complete/ decision(or JS1) on the spreadsheet so next year's peeps wont have to sift through the pages?
- toshiroh

- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:58 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Yep, that's him. He has some awesome artwork for his new mixtape.Mojosodope wrote:Is that Donald as your Avi?toshiroh wrote:Thanks. I need to break 170 though.... hopefully I can!!applelover wrote:Wow congratulations on the improvement!toshiroh wrote:Just finished PT60, 167.
So pissed at my LG score. I knew exactly what I was doing on that damn much game and second guessed myself and ended up wasting valuable time. -3 on the last game. sigh....
Anyway, for those who might need some motivation in studying. My initial diagnostic was a 137, it's possible.
-
kenwash

- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:57 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
+1 on making the spreadsheet with that info. Happy to contribute although I'm not active on heremandyjay11 wrote:ok guys, so who is going to kick off that spreadsheet? Are we noting app submit/review/complete/ decision(or JS1) on the spreadsheet so next year's peeps wont have to sift through the pages?
- AAJD2B

- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I thought californianauser (sp?) was planning to create it? Not sure if he said it was going to be made available before or after December results come in.mandyjay11 wrote:ok guys, so who is going to kick off that spreadsheet? Are we noting app submit/review/complete/ decision(or JS1) on the spreadsheet so next year's peeps wont have to sift through the pages?
Give how folks are drinking the haterade against URMs like applelover, I think our spreadsheet should be populated on a discretionary basis with two designated persons having exclusive rights to edit. I know other spreadsheets on TLS have been tampered with when everyone gains access. Whose to say someone claiming to be a URM gains access and does similar? I dunno, just a thought. Of course, once everyone's cycle is complete, we can make the spreadsheet public.