y'all i almost cannot handle all our excellencehammy393 wrote:Here's the 2016-2017 URM cycle results excel -- please add your info to help out future URMs!
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... edit#gid=0
URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 2:05 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
- dietcoke1
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
based off our limited sample on our spreadsheets, I am kicking myself for not trying to go to a better undergrad lol
just going to repeat that I think we under value how admissions look at undergrads
just going to repeat that I think we under value how admissions look at undergrads
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 2:05 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
i completely agree, at least w/r/t URMs. makes me wonder how my cycle had turned out had i not turned down Ivy UGs for financial reasons T_T but looks at us, we're doing thangs!dietcoke1 wrote:based off our limited sample on our spreadsheets, I am kicking myself for not trying to go to a better undergrad lol
just going to repeat that I think we under value how admissions look at undergrads
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Ivy would have really helped from what I've seen.texcellence wrote:i completely agree, at least w/r/t URMs. makes me wonder how my cycle had turned out had i not turned down Ivy UGs for financial reasons T_T but looks at us, we're doing thangs!dietcoke1 wrote:based off our limited sample on our spreadsheets, I am kicking myself for not trying to go to a better undergrad lol
just going to repeat that I think we under value how admissions look at undergrads
- hammy393
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I agree, especially for URMs, and especially at HYSdietcoke1 wrote:based off our limited sample on our spreadsheets, I am kicking myself for not trying to go to a better undergrad lol
just going to repeat that I think we under value how admissions look at undergrads
- hammy393
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Sorry to hear that. Did you just get an email?Mr_Chukes wrote:SEO ding
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Yeah I got an emailhammy393 wrote:Sorry to hear that. Did you just get an email?Mr_Chukes wrote:SEO ding
- presidentspivey
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:34 am
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Sigh. ASU student here. Kill me now.texcellence wrote:i completely agree, at least w/r/t URMs. makes me wonder how my cycle had turned out had i not turned down Ivy UGs for financial reasons T_T but looks at us, we're doing thangs!dietcoke1 wrote:based off our limited sample on our spreadsheets, I am kicking myself for not trying to go to a better undergrad lol
just going to repeat that I think we under value how admissions look at undergrads
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 1:32 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Hey guys. I just got an apartment on Mass ave directly across the street from HLS. If any girls are coming next year and looking for a roommate, PM me!
- lula43
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:33 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Same here, Chukes. I had a late start date and will always wonder if that impacted the decision. *shrugs*Mr_Chukes wrote:Yeah I got an emailhammy393 wrote:Sorry to hear that. Did you just get an email?Mr_Chukes wrote:SEO ding
- stjeff00
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:56 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
How much does ranking of Undergrad actually matter?presidentspivey wrote:Sigh. ASU student here. Kill me now.texcellence wrote:i completely agree, at least w/r/t URMs. makes me wonder how my cycle had turned out had i not turned down Ivy UGs for financial reasons T_T but looks at us, we're doing thangs!dietcoke1 wrote:based off our limited sample on our spreadsheets, I am kicking myself for not trying to go to a better undergrad lol
just going to repeat that I think we under value how admissions look at undergrads
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
dietcoke1 wrote:based off our limited sample on our spreadsheets, I am kicking myself for not trying to go to a better undergrad lol
just going to repeat that I think we under value how admissions look at undergrads
Yeah, we often hear how UG doesn't matter, classes, don't matter, and only GPA/LSAT matter. I have to say that just doesn't seem the case. At least not w/r/t HYS.
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- principalagent
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:15 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I went to an Ivy+ known for grade deflation and my URM friends, especially if they were black, consistently beat their numbers for law school admissions even w/r/t URM statistics. I think it definitely makes a difference. I assume admissions believes that a lower GPA at an Ivy or some other strong and tough school (think MIT, Swarthmore) is a safer bet than a higher yet still splitter GPA at other schools. Whether this call is realistic, correct or fair is another story.
Last edited by principalagent on Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 2:02 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I actually went to one of those clinics that the top 14 host where you get to talk to all of the admissions deans, and that was one of the questions I asked.
I asked if going to a small state school would impact my chances at admissions, versus going to at least a more well known top public, or a private/Ivy.
Every dean told me the same thing, that it didn't matter. Except Georgetown's dean. She actually told me that it doesn't really matter where you go, unless you went to a really good school like Harvard.
Those were pretty much her exact words if my memory serves me well as it was like close to a year ago when I went.
I asked if going to a small state school would impact my chances at admissions, versus going to at least a more well known top public, or a private/Ivy.
Every dean told me the same thing, that it didn't matter. Except Georgetown's dean. She actually told me that it doesn't really matter where you go, unless you went to a really good school like Harvard.
Those were pretty much her exact words if my memory serves me well as it was like close to a year ago when I went.
- Mrocky2
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:32 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
For some random reason I was thinking about this the other day. Adcoms say that, but in practice idk if it's the case at my T6 most of the URM's went to top 20 private schools, or top 20 LAC (Williams, Amherst etc) or flagship state schools (that's maybe 1/5 at most), or top HBCU (Howard, Spelman, Morehouse) and across the law school more generally almost no one is from a so called "no name school". They're at least from top 100 US News with over 50% from the the top 10-20. I just can't imagine that there aren't top students at the thousands of other schools with great GPAs and respectable LSATs applyin to law school. So that's all anecdotal, but seems less of a correlation and more causation to me.chetobeto wrote:I actually went to one of those clinics that the top 14 host where you get to talk to all of the admissions deans, and that was one of the questions I asked.
I asked if going to a small state school would impact my chances at admissions, versus going to at least a more well known top public, or a private/Ivy.
Every dean told me the same thing, that it didn't matter. Except Georgetown's dean. She actually told me that it doesn't really matter where you go, unless you went to a really good school like Harvard.
Those were pretty much her exact words if my memory serves me well as it was like close to a year ago when I went.
- Drea
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:33 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I mentioned this in another thread, but I think going to an Ivy+ school is helpful for URMs because it's usually a good indicator for ad coms of the rigor of an applicant's undergraduate schooling. In that way, an URM who excels at Ivy+ school is obviously looked upon very favorably. And I would assume that an URM with good but not outstanding numbers at an Ivy+ is still an attractive applicant because they've demonstrated they can handle a rigorous academic environment. For applicants from non Ivy+ schools that don't perform as well, however. ad coms may be less lenient. Nonetheless, I don't think not going to an Ivy+ school should be seen as a disadvantage. Because an URM who does outstanding anywhere is an attractive applicant at the end of the day.
Also, I'm speaking very generally here. Nobody should assume that they have a great shot simply because they went to an Ivy+ school. And those who did not also shouldn't feel like that precludes them from having a real chance at any law school. There are so so so many factors at play with these things.
(And I also wouldn't be surprised if it's just that many, if not most, of the URM applicants to T14/T6 schools simply come from highly ranked undergrads.)
Also, I'm speaking very generally here. Nobody should assume that they have a great shot simply because they went to an Ivy+ school. And those who did not also shouldn't feel like that precludes them from having a real chance at any law school. There are so so so many factors at play with these things.
(And I also wouldn't be surprised if it's just that many, if not most, of the URM applicants to T14/T6 schools simply come from highly ranked undergrads.)
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 2:55 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Can I just express how proud I am of all of us? Like, we are all doing incredible things, some of us against ridiculous odds. Great job to everyone!
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
+180HarvardHopeful95 wrote:Can I just express how proud I am of all of us? Like, we are all doing incredible things, some of us against ridiculous odds. Great job to everyone!
- Stephylynette
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 2:04 am
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Same. I'm honestly so excited for and proud of all you guys. Wishing you all the best and if you ever find yourself in Durham, holla at your girlbrinicolec wrote:+180HarvardHopeful95 wrote:Can I just express how proud I am of all of us? Like, we are all doing incredible things, some of us against ridiculous odds. Great job to everyone!
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 4:51 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Man!!! I agree with you soo much, but then i have to disagree with you a litle as well.Drea wrote: There are so so so many factors at play with these things.
(And I also wouldn't be surprised if it's just that many, if not most, of the URM applicants to T14/T6 schools simply come from highly ranked undergrads.)
I attended a a school that is outside T100 on USNWR report for 2 years, then transferred to top 20 LAC.
Got into T14/T!3 schools, and wait-listed for one school which is like a SUPER SUPER Reach for me.
I have a friend with a higher GPA, slightly lower LSAT from the T100> school - No T13 acceptances, almost identical softs, better LORs - But much softer major - I was STEM, he was pretty easy major). His essays were about the same as mine as well, and he even applied earlier.
Granted our stories are even similar - sons of immigrants, grew up together for a bit, played on same sports teams, etc.
I definitely think school attended factors in a bit more significantly than this site thinks.
As for most URMS that are qualified coming from higher ranked undergrads - thats very true - but also it indicates to me that the URM boost may be broken somewhat??? Ideally youre trying to increase representation in the legal field, and in my experience most of the URMs at top schools are wealthier on average relative to other URM in college period. I'm not saying that its the duty of the schools to fix - but I definitely think it is a problem.
As a Nigerian and African-American person myself - I feel very conflicted with the boost myself. I was born here and America is definitely my home - but I know that even though I've never been above lower middle class - i still had a ton of advantages that quite frankly - i know others dont. But I've made sure to volunteer and be active in the black communities wherever I've been at, and I really think that showed, particularly with the in-person interviews I had.
I could wax lyrical forever lol I suppose - but long story short, I think the legal field above all fields needs to be the most fair.
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 3:05 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Arizona State grad whose attending Chicago!
It did feel funny at admitted students day when we we're introducing ourselves at one of the little lunches and I was wedged between a Princeton and Yale undergrad graduate.
It did feel funny at admitted students day when we we're introducing ourselves at one of the little lunches and I was wedged between a Princeton and Yale undergrad graduate.
- dietcoke1
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
every ASW, when I said my college, students thought I meant the T10 LAC that is in the same city. after awhile I just stopped correcting people lolbeantheshadow wrote:Arizona State grad whose attending Chicago!
It did feel funny at admitted students day when we we're introducing ourselves at one of the little lunches and I was wedged between a Princeton and Yale undergrad graduate.
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:58 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Amherst v UMass Amherst?dietcoke1 wrote:every ASW, when I said my college, students thought I meant the T10 LAC that is in the same city. after awhile I just stopped correcting people lolbeantheshadow wrote:Arizona State grad whose attending Chicago!
It did feel funny at admitted students day when we we're introducing ourselves at one of the little lunches and I was wedged between a Princeton and Yale undergrad graduate.
- dietcoke1
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
noopee. UMass A is far better ranked than my undergradsmilingorch wrote:Amherst v UMass Amherst?dietcoke1 wrote:every ASW, when I said my college, students thought I meant the T10 LAC that is in the same city. after awhile I just stopped correcting people lolbeantheshadow wrote:Arizona State grad whose attending Chicago!
It did feel funny at admitted students day when we we're introducing ourselves at one of the little lunches and I was wedged between a Princeton and Yale undergrad graduate.
Last edited by dietcoke1 on Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.