#HeyBooQuan292 wrote:Random but am I the only one that time is showing up as an hour ahead on all the post I see. Did TLS just not update for dst?
Also @okaygo
URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
okaygo
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
-
applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
And the PW died that quickly
-
californiauser
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I missed it.applelover wrote:And the PW died that quickly
-
El Principe
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
5 guests lurking...
-
applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Awww!californiauser wrote:I missed it.applelover wrote:And the PW died that quickly
-
MoMettaMonk
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:29 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
With Geoffrey.
Last edited by MoMettaMonk on Tue Nov 05, 2013 7:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
okaygo
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
[img]gone.jpg[/img]
heyyy
heyyy
Last edited by okaygo on Tue Nov 05, 2013 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
El Principe
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Oh, we still PW'ing?
Let me pull out the pics
Let me pull out the pics
-
TheLordTitan
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 6:39 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Lurk Miley lurk!El Principe wrote:5 guests lurking...
-
El Principe
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Adios
Last edited by El Principe on Tue Nov 05, 2013 7:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
hay girl hayokaygo wrote:[
heyyy
-
applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I missed the pictures
-
Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Can't PW right now, on a PT break =(
-
okaygo
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
--ImageRemoved--Mojosodope wrote:hay girl hayokaygo wrote:[
heyyy
-
MoMettaMonk
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:29 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
If the women in this thread are indicative of the women in elite law schools, I am going to thoroughly enjoy the next three years of my life.
-
okaygo
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
El Principe wrote:
Adios
-
EstebanMFernandez
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 7:37 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Saw the guy with Geoffrey... hahahaha Man that was super cool.
-
applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
MoMettaMonk wrote:If the women in this thread are indicative of the women in elite law schools, I am going to thoroughly enjoy the next three years of my life.
I mean I'm in at 3 t-14s so far so maybe.
-
El Principe
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Looks like I gotta get my LSAT score up thenapplelover wrote:MoMettaMonk wrote:If the women in this thread are indicative of the women in elite law schools, I am going to thoroughly enjoy the next three years of my life.
I mean I'm in at 3 t-14s so far so maybe.
-
El Principe
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I see youokaygo wrote:El Principe wrote:
Adios
-
californiauser
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
You're likely to be outnumbered 2 if not 3 to 1, too.MoMettaMonk wrote:If the women in this thread are indicative of the women in elite law schools, I am going to thoroughly enjoy the next three years of my life.
-
Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
A TLSer once said: "The women you will get pre-LSAT score 170+ are not even worth wasting your time. Post LSAT 170+ score will get you women you wouldn't have otherwise gotten." - Dr. Drecaliforniauser wrote:You're likely to be outnumbered 2 if not 3 to 1, too.MoMettaMonk wrote:If the women in this thread are indicative of the women in elite law schools, I am going to thoroughly enjoy the next three years of my life.
I'm starting to believe him.
-
MoMettaMonk
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:29 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
LOL Dr. Dre would say something like that.Dr.Zer0 wrote:A TLSer once said: "The women you will get pre-LSAT score 170+ are not even worth wasting your time. Post LSAT 170+ score will get you women you wouldn't have otherwise gotten." - Dr. Drecaliforniauser wrote:You're likely to be outnumbered 2 if not 3 to 1, too.MoMettaMonk wrote:If the women in this thread are indicative of the women in elite law schools, I am going to thoroughly enjoy the next three years of my life.
I'm starting to believe him.
-
El Principe
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
MoMettaMonk wrote:LOL Dr. Dre would say something like that.Dr.Zer0 wrote:A TLSer once said: "The women you will get pre-LSAT score 170+ are not even worth wasting your time. Post LSAT 170+ score will get you women you wouldn't have otherwise gotten." - Dr. Drecaliforniauser wrote:You're likely to be outnumbered 2 if not 3 to 1, too.MoMettaMonk wrote:If the women in this thread are indicative of the women in elite law schools, I am going to thoroughly enjoy the next three years of my life.
I'm starting to believe him.
When Dre gonna drop that Detox album tho?
-
californiauser
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Dr. Dre the poster has autism.Dr.Zer0 wrote:A TLSer once said: "The women you will get pre-LSAT score 170+ are not even worth wasting your time. Post LSAT 170+ score will get you women you wouldn't have otherwise gotten." - Dr. Drecaliforniauser wrote:You're likely to be outnumbered 2 if not 3 to 1, too.MoMettaMonk wrote:If the women in this thread are indicative of the women in elite law schools, I am going to thoroughly enjoy the next three years of my life.
I'm starting to believe him.
