No idea. I just wish UT could be a t14 lol.S.Picquery wrote:The new rankings come out next week-ish, right?PrezRand wrote:I guess Cornell wants to jump into the T10fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell
URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- PrezRand
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:38 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
.
Last edited by cardboard0917 on Tue May 23, 2017 1:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Stephylynette
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 2:04 am
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Duke=Vanderbilt=BU. All very generous. UT was pretty alright as well. George Washington & Michigan were stingy (Michigan for obvious reasons) lolhammy393 wrote:Which schools have been most generous to you guys in their aid packages?
For me it's been: Wash U > Duke > Vanderbilt > USC > Berkeley in sheer $$$ amount (obviously very different tiers, so it's not apples to apples)
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 4:51 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Why would Michigan be stingy toward you?Stephylynette wrote:Duke=Vanderbilt=BU. All very generous. UT was pretty alright as well. George Washington & Michigan were stingy (Michigan for obvious reasons) lolhammy393 wrote:Which schools have been most generous to you guys in their aid packages?
For me it's been: Wash U > Duke > Vanderbilt > USC > Berkeley in sheer $$$ amount (obviously very different tiers, so it's not apples to apples)
- hammy393
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I'm not the OP but I got $0 from Michigan lolHi-So - ArshavinFan wrote:Why would Michigan be stingy toward you?Stephylynette wrote:Duke=Vanderbilt=BU. All very generous. UT was pretty alright as well. George Washington & Michigan were stingy (Michigan for obvious reasons) lolhammy393 wrote:Which schools have been most generous to you guys in their aid packages?
For me it's been: Wash U > Duke > Vanderbilt > USC > Berkeley in sheer $$$ amount (obviously very different tiers, so it's not apples to apples)
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
It practically is lol. All these schools are gunning for the top lol.PrezRand wrote:No idea. I just wish UT could be a t14 lol.S.Picquery wrote:The new rankings come out next week-ish, right?PrezRand wrote:I guess Cornell wants to jump into the T10fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell
- Thomas Hagan, ESQ.
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:55 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Any chance Cooley can break top 25 by 2019??Mr_Chukes wrote:It practically is lol. All these schools are gunning for the top lol.PrezRand wrote:No idea. I just wish UT could be a t14 lol.S.Picquery wrote:The new rankings come out next week-ish, right?PrezRand wrote:I guess Cornell wants to jump into the T10fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell
- S.Picquery
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Looking at these LRAPs is making breathing a lot easier.
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
+1hammy393 wrote:I'm not the OP but I got $0 from Michigan lolHi-So - ArshavinFan wrote:Why would Michigan be stingy toward you?Stephylynette wrote:Duke=Vanderbilt=BU. All very generous. UT was pretty alright as well. George Washington & Michigan were stingy (Michigan for obvious reasons) lolhammy393 wrote:Which schools have been most generous to you guys in their aid packages?
For me it's been: Wash U > Duke > Vanderbilt > USC > Berkeley in sheer $$$ amount (obviously very different tiers, so it's not apples to apples)
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Yeah, that's not too bad. Especially for a studio apartment.Mr_Chukes wrote:Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
- waldorf
- Posts: 2376
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 6:28 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Sorry to crash the URM thread but I creep sometimes and saw this..Mr_Chukes wrote:Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
My current apartment is around 625 and it has two bedrooms, 1 bath (the bathroom is the only very small part), spacious closets, a hugggge room that is split into a living room and dining area, and kitchen. So I'd say you'll have more than enough space!
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Thanks, I guess I gotta see them in person as well lol. Just looking at places and getting an estimate so I won't waste my time.brinicolec wrote:Yeah, that's not too bad. Especially for a studio apartment.Mr_Chukes wrote:Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Yeah, definitely check places out in person. Pictures can be misleading lolMr_Chukes wrote:Thanks, I guess I gotta see them in person as well lol. Just looking at places and getting an estimate so I won't waste my time.brinicolec wrote:Yeah, that's not too bad. Especially for a studio apartment.Mr_Chukes wrote:Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Plus they gotta let my cat in lol.brinicolec wrote:Yeah, definitely check places out in person. Pictures can be misleading lolMr_Chukes wrote:Thanks, I guess I gotta see them in person as well lol. Just looking at places and getting an estimate so I won't waste my time.brinicolec wrote:Yeah, that's not too bad. Especially for a studio apartment.Mr_Chukes wrote:Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Thanks bro! definitely putting that one on the list lol.bwaldorf wrote:Sorry to crash the URM thread but I creep sometimes and saw this..Mr_Chukes wrote:Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
My current apartment is around 625 and it has two bedrooms, 1 bath (the bathroom is the only very small part), spacious closets, a hugggge room that is split into a living room and dining area, and kitchen. So I'd say you'll have more than enough space!
- alpha kenny body
- Posts: 4850
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I have a 900sqft condo, and it's way more than one person needs. 700 is probably as well.Mr_Chukes wrote:Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:42 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell
Idk man, Cornell doesnt seem to be more selective than Duke or Michigan.
Surprise/Unpopular opinion - Georgetown falls out of the T-14, Texas or UCLA slips in
- Thomas Hagan, ESQ.
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:55 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
It's a joke haha and my vote for 14 is Vanderbilt obviouslyWhat2donow1 wrote:fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell
Idk man, Cornell doesnt seem to be more selective than Duke or Michigan.
Surprise/Unpopular opinion - Georgetown falls out of the T-14, Texas or UCLA slips in

- alpha kenny body
- Posts: 4850
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I could see Vandy and Texas switching places for realThomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:It's a joke haha and my vote for 14 is Vanderbilt obviouslyWhat2donow1 wrote:fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell
Idk man, Cornell doesnt seem to be more selective than Duke or Michigan.
Surprise/Unpopular opinion - Georgetown falls out of the T-14, Texas or UCLA slips in
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Just beautiful lolfips tedora wrote:I have a 900sqft condo, and it's way more than one person needs. 700 is probably as well.Mr_Chukes wrote:Is a 695 Sq Ft studio spacious lol. I dont know anything about housing and I'm looking at apartments.
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I really don't think Georgetown should be a T14, tbh lolWhat2donow1 wrote:fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell
Idk man, Cornell doesnt seem to be more selective than Duke or Michigan.
Surprise/Unpopular opinion - Georgetown falls out of the T-14, Texas or UCLA slips in
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:02 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Jumping in on this to say I agree with you bri! But it could also be me just being salty off getting put on the WL.brinicolec wrote:I really don't think Georgetown should be a T14, tbh lolWhat2donow1 wrote:fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell
Idk man, Cornell doesnt seem to be more selective than Duke or Michigan.
Surprise/Unpopular opinion - Georgetown falls out of the T-14, Texas or UCLA slips in
+1 for UT slipping into T14 and wildcard forecast: USC overtakes UCLA

- Stephylynette
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 2:04 am
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I worded that weird but I just meant it's understandable for Michigan to be stingy while George Washington is less credible for it.Hi-So - ArshavinFan wrote:Why would Michigan be stingy toward you?Stephylynette wrote:Duke=Vanderbilt=BU. All very generous. UT was pretty alright as well. George Washington & Michigan were stingy (Michigan for obvious reasons) lolhammy393 wrote:Which schools have been most generous to you guys in their aid packages?
For me it's been: Wash U > Duke > Vanderbilt > USC > Berkeley in sheer $$$ amount (obviously very different tiers, so it's not apples to apples)
- PrezRand
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
In Texas it is lolMr_Chukes wrote:It practically is lol. All these schools are gunning for the top lol.PrezRand wrote:No idea. I just wish UT could be a t14 lol.S.Picquery wrote:The new rankings come out next week-ish, right?PrezRand wrote:I guess Cornell wants to jump into the T10fips tedora wrote:BostonU, ND, and Cornell are jumping up for sure, solely based on their weirdness.Thomas Hagan, ESQ. wrote:2017 USWR Rankings (according to Cornell)fips tedora wrote:this cycle is weird AF. i'm expecting the new rankings to reflect this.
1. Yale
2. Harvard
2. Stanford
4. Cornell