Don't you have to wait two years?KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
- sfn91
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:43 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
You'll have to wait until December I think, because September still won't be 2 years since since the first take.brinicolec wrote:Don't you have to wait two years?KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
Edited: Actually, I vaguely remember someone taking it a month before it was two years because it was close enough to a two-year gap between administrations. I'd e-mail LSAC.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:07 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
The way I understand the rule is its "3 times in a 2 year window" so since my first time taking it was OCT. 15, I would be eligible 2 years after this time. If I'm intepreting this wrong but this is just what ive seen on TLS, Reddit, google, etc. Now whether or not I can take in Sept. or Dec. i'm not 100% sure.brinicolec wrote:Don't you have to wait two years?KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
BTW if someone is reading this and I'm mistaking PLZ LET ME KNOW THX
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:07 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Good idea I will email them asap and ask. I have really bad test anxiety and I sat last Dec. after sleeping for 2 hours. BIG MISTAKE on my partsfn91 wrote:You'll have to wait until December I think, because September still won't be 2 years since since the first take.brinicolec wrote:Don't you have to wait two years?KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
Edited: Actually, I vaguely remember someone taking it a month before it was two years because it was close enough to a two-year gap between administrations. I'd e-mail LSAC.
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:07 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
thanks man, and congrats on your cycle! I know you got USC, thats a great option for Cali. I'm still waiting on schools to get back to me but I applied pretty late. I mean if I have a good option or two I'll consider it of course. My gpa sucks tho (3.1) so I think I need a higher LSAT + putting apps in earlier if I want a T14.Mr_Chukes wrote:I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Yeah a higher LSAT will offset your GPA. The same way how my GPA helps offset my LSAT.KillaKam92 wrote:thanks man, and congrats on your cycle! I know you got USC, thats a great option for Cali. I'm still waiting on schools to get back to me but I applied pretty late. I mean if I have a good option or two I'll consider it of course. My gpa sucks tho (3.1) so I think I need a higher LSAT + putting apps in earlier if I want a T14.Mr_Chukes wrote:I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
- S.Picquery
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
+1 My GPA is that of a physics major... but that LSAT, tho.Mr_Chukes wrote:Yeah a higher LSAT will offset your GPA. The same way how my GPA helps offset my LSAT.KillaKam92 wrote:thanks man, and congrats on your cycle! I know you got USC, thats a great option for Cali. I'm still waiting on schools to get back to me but I applied pretty late. I mean if I have a good option or two I'll consider it of course. My gpa sucks tho (3.1) so I think I need a higher LSAT + putting apps in earlier if I want a T14.Mr_Chukes wrote:I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Sometimes I think since I am going into law I could have done computer science for undergrad because you can do whatever and go to law school. On the other hand, I really enjoy the Political Philosophy courses that I was able to take. Those classes challenged me the most and truly excited me. Political Science is a nice major but everything came too easy to me.S.Picquery wrote:+1 My GPA is that of a physics major... but that LSAT, tho.Mr_Chukes wrote:Yeah a higher LSAT will offset your GPA. The same way how my GPA helps offset my LSAT.KillaKam92 wrote:thanks man, and congrats on your cycle! I know you got USC, thats a great option for Cali. I'm still waiting on schools to get back to me but I applied pretty late. I mean if I have a good option or two I'll consider it of course. My gpa sucks tho (3.1) so I think I need a higher LSAT + putting apps in earlier if I want a T14.Mr_Chukes wrote:I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
- S.Picquery
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I would never do comp sci in undergrad. It's so easy to learn on your own, and fewer jobs are requiring the degree now, and just test your aptitude. I truly believe compsci will be a big help in equalizing the playing field for many who cannot afford higher ed.Mr_Chukes wrote:Sometimes I think since I am going into law I could have done computer science for undergrad because you can do whatever and go to law school. On the other hand, I really enjoy the Political Philosophy courses that I was able to take. Those classes challenged me the most and truly excited me. Political Science is a nice major but everything came too easy to me.
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Yeah that's one thing I thought about that it is easy to learn on your own. There are many coding websites as well and jobs are being shifted overseas. I'm glad I got to challenge myself. The thing is I was always really good at math as well.S.Picquery wrote:I would never do comp sci in undergrad. It's so easy to learn on your own, and fewer jobs are requiring the degree now, and just test your aptitude. I truly believe compsci will be a big help in equalizing the playing field for many who cannot afford higher ed.Mr_Chukes wrote:Sometimes I think since I am going into law I could have done computer science for undergrad because you can do whatever and go to law school. On the other hand, I really enjoy the Political Philosophy courses that I was able to take. Those classes challenged me the most and truly excited me. Political Science is a nice major but everything came too easy to me.
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
- S.Picquery
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
*shrug* getting lost in a crowd is overrated. You'll have better options.uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
e: Also, Boston sucks.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
AA URM? Sorry to hear that my man

Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
yes aa urmBarack O'Drama wrote:uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
AA URM? Sorry to hear that my man
- USayinBoalt
- Posts: 1614
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:40 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
sorry to hear about thatuhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7

Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:57 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Very similar stats to you but I was still holding out hope! 165 3.7 AA female from an Ivy (applying K-JD) but just got my Feb LSAT score tonight so I doubt they've looked at my application yet. Do you really think its an automatic ding?uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
i went to a state school. and that 2 points extra on your lsat will be a huge boost giving a much higher chance than me....klove2020 wrote:Very similar stats to you but I was still holding out hope! 165 3.7 AA female from an Ivy (applying K-JD) but just got my Feb LSAT score tonight so I doubt they've looked at my application yet. Do you really think its an automatic ding?uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
coming from the rural south my dream is to go to a big shot northeastern ivy lolUSayinBoalt wrote:sorry to hear about thatuhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7![]()
Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
so far i got cornell and im pretty happy about that
i was waitlisted at columbia a little disappointed about that
but i am overall happy with cornell
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
That's a nice school to have, they were weird this year.uhwrestler wrote:coming from the rural south my dream is to go to a big shot northeastern ivy lolUSayinBoalt wrote:sorry to hear about thatuhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7![]()
Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
so far i got cornell and im pretty happy about that
i was waitlisted at columbia a little disappointed about that
but i am overall happy with cornell
- alpha kenny body
- Posts: 4850
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Mr_Chukes wrote:That's a nice school to have, they were weird this year.uhwrestler wrote:coming from the rural south my dream is to go to a big shot northeastern ivy lolUSayinBoalt wrote:sorry to hear about thatuhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7![]()
Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
so far i got cornell and im pretty happy about that
i was waitlisted at columbia a little disappointed about that
but i am overall happy with cornell
- sfn91
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:43 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Your application must have had some really good strengths because Cornell has been very picky this year! Are you also first-generation?uhwrestler wrote:coming from the rural south my dream is to go to a big shot northeastern ivy lolUSayinBoalt wrote:sorry to hear about thatuhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7![]()
Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
so far i got cornell and im pretty happy about that
i was waitlisted at columbia a little disappointed about that
but i am overall happy with cornell
- hammy393
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
New Spivey LSAT cycle data is out (does not include Feb scores): http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... 2-24-2017/
- MrJD2020
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:59 am
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Yay!hammy393 wrote:New Spivey LSAT cycle data is out (does not include Feb scores): http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... 2-24-2017/
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 10:05 am
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I got an email from Emory but it was just to say only file is still in review 
