URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
User avatar
brinicolec

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by brinicolec » Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:59 pm

KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
Don't you have to wait two years?

User avatar
sfn91

Bronze
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:43 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by sfn91 » Tue Feb 28, 2017 2:15 pm

brinicolec wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
Don't you have to wait two years?
You'll have to wait until December I think, because September still won't be 2 years since since the first take.

Edited: Actually, I vaguely remember someone taking it a month before it was two years because it was close enough to a two-year gap between administrations. I'd e-mail LSAC.

KillaKam92

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:07 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by KillaKam92 » Tue Feb 28, 2017 2:17 pm

brinicolec wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
Don't you have to wait two years?
The way I understand the rule is its "3 times in a 2 year window" so since my first time taking it was OCT. 15, I would be eligible 2 years after this time. If I'm intepreting this wrong but this is just what ive seen on TLS, Reddit, google, etc. Now whether or not I can take in Sept. or Dec. i'm not 100% sure.

BTW if someone is reading this and I'm mistaking PLZ LET ME KNOW THX

KillaKam92

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:07 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by KillaKam92 » Tue Feb 28, 2017 2:19 pm

sfn91 wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
Don't you have to wait two years?
You'll have to wait until December I think, because September still won't be 2 years since since the first take.

Edited: Actually, I vaguely remember someone taking it a month before it was two years because it was close enough to a two-year gap between administrations. I'd e-mail LSAC.
Good idea I will email them asap and ask. I have really bad test anxiety and I sat last Dec. after sleeping for 2 hours. BIG MISTAKE on my part

User avatar
Mr_Chukes

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Mr_Chukes » Tue Feb 28, 2017 3:04 pm

KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.

KillaKam92

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:07 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by KillaKam92 » Tue Feb 28, 2017 3:24 pm

Mr_Chukes wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.
thanks man, and congrats on your cycle! I know you got USC, thats a great option for Cali. I'm still waiting on schools to get back to me but I applied pretty late. I mean if I have a good option or two I'll consider it of course. My gpa sucks tho (3.1) so I think I need a higher LSAT + putting apps in earlier if I want a T14.

User avatar
Mr_Chukes

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Mr_Chukes » Tue Feb 28, 2017 3:35 pm

KillaKam92 wrote:
Mr_Chukes wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.
thanks man, and congrats on your cycle! I know you got USC, thats a great option for Cali. I'm still waiting on schools to get back to me but I applied pretty late. I mean if I have a good option or two I'll consider it of course. My gpa sucks tho (3.1) so I think I need a higher LSAT + putting apps in earlier if I want a T14.
Yeah a higher LSAT will offset your GPA. The same way how my GPA helps offset my LSAT.

User avatar
S.Picquery

Silver
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by S.Picquery » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:11 pm

Mr_Chukes wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:
Mr_Chukes wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.
thanks man, and congrats on your cycle! I know you got USC, thats a great option for Cali. I'm still waiting on schools to get back to me but I applied pretty late. I mean if I have a good option or two I'll consider it of course. My gpa sucks tho (3.1) so I think I need a higher LSAT + putting apps in earlier if I want a T14.
Yeah a higher LSAT will offset your GPA. The same way how my GPA helps offset my LSAT.
+1 My GPA is that of a physics major... but that LSAT, tho.

User avatar
Mr_Chukes

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Mr_Chukes » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:16 pm

S.Picquery wrote:
Mr_Chukes wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:
Mr_Chukes wrote:
KillaKam92 wrote:So I've decided to re-take the LSAT, I think adding 5-6 more point to my 163 would really open a lot up for me T14 wise. Not sure if I'll have to wait til Sept/Dec though since I used up all my 3 takes OCT 15 FEB 16 and DEC 16.
I thought about retaking but honestly my cycle has gone so well that I forgot that I don't even care anymore lol. Yeah that's a good choice if you have the time and I hope you do better bro.
thanks man, and congrats on your cycle! I know you got USC, thats a great option for Cali. I'm still waiting on schools to get back to me but I applied pretty late. I mean if I have a good option or two I'll consider it of course. My gpa sucks tho (3.1) so I think I need a higher LSAT + putting apps in earlier if I want a T14.
Yeah a higher LSAT will offset your GPA. The same way how my GPA helps offset my LSAT.
+1 My GPA is that of a physics major... but that LSAT, tho.
Sometimes I think since I am going into law I could have done computer science for undergrad because you can do whatever and go to law school. On the other hand, I really enjoy the Political Philosophy courses that I was able to take. Those classes challenged me the most and truly excited me. Political Science is a nice major but everything came too easy to me.

User avatar
S.Picquery

Silver
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by S.Picquery » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:23 pm

Mr_Chukes wrote:Sometimes I think since I am going into law I could have done computer science for undergrad because you can do whatever and go to law school. On the other hand, I really enjoy the Political Philosophy courses that I was able to take. Those classes challenged me the most and truly excited me. Political Science is a nice major but everything came too easy to me.
I would never do comp sci in undergrad. It's so easy to learn on your own, and fewer jobs are requiring the degree now, and just test your aptitude. I truly believe compsci will be a big help in equalizing the playing field for many who cannot afford higher ed.

User avatar
Mr_Chukes

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Mr_Chukes » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:48 pm

S.Picquery wrote:
Mr_Chukes wrote:Sometimes I think since I am going into law I could have done computer science for undergrad because you can do whatever and go to law school. On the other hand, I really enjoy the Political Philosophy courses that I was able to take. Those classes challenged me the most and truly excited me. Political Science is a nice major but everything came too easy to me.
I would never do comp sci in undergrad. It's so easy to learn on your own, and fewer jobs are requiring the degree now, and just test your aptitude. I truly believe compsci will be a big help in equalizing the playing field for many who cannot afford higher ed.
Yeah that's one thing I thought about that it is easy to learn on your own. There are many coding websites as well and jobs are being shifted overseas. I'm glad I got to challenge myself. The thing is I was always really good at math as well.

uhwrestler

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by uhwrestler » Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:08 pm

rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7

User avatar
S.Picquery

Silver
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by S.Picquery » Tue Feb 28, 2017 6:27 pm

uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
*shrug* getting lost in a crowd is overrated. You'll have better options.

e: Also, Boston sucks.

User avatar
Barack O'Drama

Gold
Posts: 3272
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Barack O'Drama » Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:23 pm

uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7

AA URM? Sorry to hear that my man :(
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

uhwrestler

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by uhwrestler » Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:58 pm

Barack O'Drama wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7

AA URM? Sorry to hear that my man :(
yes aa urm

User avatar
USayinBoalt

Gold
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:40 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by USayinBoalt » Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:02 pm

uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
sorry to hear about that :(

Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?

klove2020

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:57 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by klove2020 » Wed Mar 01, 2017 12:02 am

uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
Very similar stats to you but I was still holding out hope! 165 3.7 AA female from an Ivy (applying K-JD) but just got my Feb LSAT score tonight so I doubt they've looked at my application yet. Do you really think its an automatic ding?

uhwrestler

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by uhwrestler » Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:12 am

klove2020 wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
Very similar stats to you but I was still holding out hope! 165 3.7 AA female from an Ivy (applying K-JD) but just got my Feb LSAT score tonight so I doubt they've looked at my application yet. Do you really think its an automatic ding?
i went to a state school. and that 2 points extra on your lsat will be a huge boost giving a much higher chance than me....

uhwrestler

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by uhwrestler » Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:14 am

USayinBoalt wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
sorry to hear about that :(

Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
coming from the rural south my dream is to go to a big shot northeastern ivy lol

so far i got cornell and im pretty happy about that
i was waitlisted at columbia a little disappointed about that

but i am overall happy with cornell

User avatar
Mr_Chukes

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Mr_Chukes » Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:32 am

uhwrestler wrote:
USayinBoalt wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
sorry to hear about that :(

Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
coming from the rural south my dream is to go to a big shot northeastern ivy lol

so far i got cornell and im pretty happy about that
i was waitlisted at columbia a little disappointed about that

but i am overall happy with cornell
That's a nice school to have, they were weird this year.

User avatar
alpha kenny body

Gold
Posts: 4850
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by alpha kenny body » Wed Mar 01, 2017 1:10 pm

Mr_Chukes wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:
USayinBoalt wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
sorry to hear about that :(

Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
coming from the rural south my dream is to go to a big shot northeastern ivy lol

so far i got cornell and im pretty happy about that
i was waitlisted at columbia a little disappointed about that

but i am overall happy with cornell
That's a nice school to have, they were weird this year.

User avatar
sfn91

Bronze
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:43 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by sfn91 » Wed Mar 01, 2017 1:42 pm

uhwrestler wrote:
USayinBoalt wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:rejected at harvard no interview....not surprised. aa 163 3.7
sorry to hear about that :(

Outside of Harvard, how is your cycle going?
coming from the rural south my dream is to go to a big shot northeastern ivy lol

so far i got cornell and im pretty happy about that
i was waitlisted at columbia a little disappointed about that

but i am overall happy with cornell
Your application must have had some really good strengths because Cornell has been very picky this year! Are you also first-generation?

User avatar
hammy393

Bronze
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by hammy393 » Wed Mar 01, 2017 2:18 pm

New Spivey LSAT cycle data is out (does not include Feb scores): http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... 2-24-2017/

User avatar
MrJD2020

Bronze
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:59 am

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by MrJD2020 » Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:45 pm

hammy393 wrote:New Spivey LSAT cycle data is out (does not include Feb scores): http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... 2-24-2017/
Yay!

Dip

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 10:05 am

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Dip » Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:59 pm

I got an email from Emory but it was just to say only file is still in review :roll:

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”