I'm talking about both but LR cambridge packets are great. What I did to improve was first I did timed sections, and then noticed I was always getting the same kind of questions wrong. For example, I would crush strengthen/weaken and flaw questions, but I would struggle with tough NA and parallel flaw/reasoning questions. When I was able to focus on my weaknesses in LR i was able to make the jump from getting -6/7 wrong to consistently no more than -2 per section. I drilled with questions I've seen before but a while ago, I took back in Feb so I'm gonna be on my second take now. I think you can still get value from drilling old questions although fresh questions (if you have some available and aren't planning on PTing with them) are always better. I saw someone post on TLS that the best way to go about is to drill questions for PTs 1-38, do timed sections for 38-50 and then PT the rest, I'm basically using that as a guideline.chueca910 wrote:PoopNpants wrote:I know this is really gonna suck for those who don't have these kind of resources. I really saw my scorers improve a lot when I started drilling heavily.MajinBuu wrote:I don't know how often people go to the LSAT prep forum on here but for everyone taking the LSAT in October or December I hope you are aware that as of August 15th you won't be able to buy pdf versions of PTs/ question anymore. This is especially annoying because some of the more recent tests haven't been released in book form by lsac.
I know that having the tests and questions types in pdf that I could print has been invaluable to my prep.
@Poopnpants, are you mainly talking about LR or LG or even both. And how long after drilling did you see improvements (specifically LR)? The gains I've made with LR are pretty inconsistent so I'm deciding whether to get more pdf drilling packets or hold off because I hate seeing questions that I've already seen before when PT-ing or drilling by section.
URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:40 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
I don't dispute the premise of retaking, but is pride a valid reason for doing so? lolAnonymousApplicant wrote:AshburtonGrove, I'd recommend you retake as well, not necessarily to improve your chances at HYS but to get a score that you can be proud of when you get to H, Y or S, for you will definitely be at one of them next fall.fips tedora wrote:If you re-take and score 3 points+ higher, you'll more than likely get into Y or H. I think you're basically good for S and probably WL then Accepted to H, yet a re-take in October and submission by November could'nt hurt! Your cycle is going to be decent.AshburtonGrove wrote:Hey everyone, checking in. AA male w/3.75-3.8 GPA and 164. Planning on blanketing the top 14 plus a few others. Hoping to submit by early October. Best of luck to you all!
-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
I think pride is such a stupid reason for re-taking tbh, the LSAT is no barometer of success as a law student, it is simply a tool for getting INTO law school. I'd say re-take just since a couple points will get you YS but it's really up to you. nothing to lose and a whole lot to gain but either way your in a position many would envy you will do fine.AshburtonGrove wrote:I don't dispute the premise of retaking, but is pride a valid reason for doing so? lolAnonymousApplicant wrote:AshburtonGrove, I'd recommend you retake as well, not necessarily to improve your chances at HYS but to get a score that you can be proud of when you get to H, Y or S, for you will definitely be at one of them next fall.fips tedora wrote:If you re-take and score 3 points+ higher, you'll more than likely get into Y or H. I think you're basically good for S and probably WL then Accepted to H, yet a re-take in October and submission by November could'nt hurt! Your cycle is going to be decent.AshburtonGrove wrote:Hey everyone, checking in. AA male w/3.75-3.8 GPA and 164. Planning on blanketing the top 14 plus a few others. Hoping to submit by early October. Best of luck to you all!
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 11:53 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
Ahh thanks! Super helpful.PoopNpants wrote:I'm talking about both but LR cambridge packets are great. What I did to improve was first I did timed sections, and then noticed I was always getting the same kind of questions wrong. For example, I would crush strengthen/weaken and flaw questions, but I would struggle with tough NA and parallel flaw/reasoning questions. When I was able to focus on my weaknesses in LR i was able to make the jump from getting -6/7 wrong to consistently no more than -2 per section. I drilled with questions I've seen before but a while ago, I took back in Feb so I'm gonna be on my second take now. I think you can still get value from drilling old questions although fresh questions (if you have some available and aren't planning on PTing with them) are always better. I saw someone post on TLS that the best way to go about is to drill questions for PTs 1-38, do timed sections for 38-50 and then PT the rest, I'm basically using that as a guideline.chueca910 wrote:PoopNpants wrote:I know this is really gonna suck for those who don't have these kind of resources. I really saw my scorers improve a lot when I started drilling heavily.MajinBuu wrote:I don't know how often people go to the LSAT prep forum on here but for everyone taking the LSAT in October or December I hope you are aware that as of August 15th you won't be able to buy pdf versions of PTs/ question anymore. This is especially annoying because some of the more recent tests haven't been released in book form by lsac.
I know that having the tests and questions types in pdf that I could print has been invaluable to my prep.
@Poopnpants, are you mainly talking about LR or LG or even both. And how long after drilling did you see improvements (specifically LR)? The gains I've made with LR are pretty inconsistent so I'm deciding whether to get more pdf drilling packets or hold off because I hate seeing questions that I've already seen before when PT-ing or drilling by section.
-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
No prob, happy to help. Be sure to check out the manhattan forums for LR if any difficult Q's trip you up. They have some great explanations up there. LR IMO is similar to LG, with a lot of drilling and practice it can be mastered. good luck!chueca910 wrote: Ahh thanks! Super helpful.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:15 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
Hey everyone! Good luck on this cycle in advance.
- ltowns1
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
How is everybody doin with their prep
- Shiv3rs-n-Ice
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:31 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
It was going well, but now I'm stuck on mastering LR timed.ltowns1 wrote:How is everybody doin with their prep
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 11:53 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
Yeah same, I've gotten pretty good at LG but LR is kicking my butt.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:15 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
Same, I can learn LG pretty quickly but LR is so nuanced. RC is a toss up depending on how engaging the passage is, much more practice needed.chueca910 wrote:Yeah same, I've gotten pretty good at LG but LR is kicking my butt.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 6:00 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
I definitely hear you, after about a month and a half I think I've already hit a ceiling on my LG (about -1 to -3 at the most) and am now entirely focused on upping my LR, which is really giving me a hard time.chueca910 wrote:Yeah same, I've gotten pretty good at LG but LR is kicking my butt.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:34 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
you guys I really don't know if I should apply to UCLA and USC. Everyone says the California law market is extremely hard to break into without ties to the region. I have family and friends there but other than that I don't know any lawyers there. I just feel like it would be a waste of money and I'm already applying to so many schools so I'm seeing where I can skim on the application money. However, what do you guys think of the prospective job opportunities after graduation from either school. how do URMS do in their application cycles? help!
- alpha kenny body
- Posts: 4850
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
You have family and friends there, plus you would be attending one of those two schools. Typically, those two factors fall under what is called ties to a legal market. HTH. Also, check out lawschoolnumbers.com and search around for each school.NigeranOU wrote:you guys I really don't know if I should apply to UCLA and USC. Everyone says the California law market is extremely hard to break into without ties to the region. I have family and friends there but other than that I don't know any lawyers there. I just feel like it would be a waste of money and I'm already applying to so many schools so I'm seeing where I can skim on the application money. However, what do you guys think of the prospective job opportunities after graduation from either school. how do URMS do in their application cycles? help!
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:34 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
The family and friends I have there are predominantly in the Bay Area and I am applying to Berkeley for sure. I don't understand how my friends and family there help me get a job thoughfips tedora wrote:You have family and friends there, plus you would be attending one of those two schools. Typically, those two factors fall under what is called ties to a legal market. HTH. Also, check out lawschoolnumbers.com and search around for each school.NigeranOU wrote:you guys I really don't know if I should apply to UCLA and USC. Everyone says the California law market is extremely hard to break into without ties to the region. I have family and friends there but other than that I don't know any lawyers there. I just feel like it would be a waste of money and I'm already applying to so many schools so I'm seeing where I can skim on the application money. However, what do you guys think of the prospective job opportunities after graduation from either school. how do URMS do in their application cycles? help!
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 6:51 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
.
Last edited by woc on Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BeautyAndTheBrief
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 10:28 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
Finally checking in. Nice to see a more relaxed thread full of support. AA female btw. Good luck to all prepping for the October LSAT!
You are not the only one. I planned on taking the October LSAT, but I've been leaning towards postponing until December. My top LS choice has (slight) rolling admissions so I think I may be okay. I feel more confident that waiting until December will actually secure more $$$. That will also give me more time to get back in touch with another professor for my 2nd LOR.JazzyLaw1 wrote:Been creeping on this cite for some time now. Signed up to sit the October LSAT and was prepping well until I started my new job (8-16:30 Mon-Fri). Basically, I come home from work exhausted and have not really studied well. I was making substantial gains before the new job but now I really haven't touched my books. I am starting to figure out how to make time for LSAT prep and I have begun writing my PS. Is anyone else leaning more towards that December LSAT? Also how detrimental do you think December LSAT would be in regards to scholarship money? I know its more on the late side of the cycle.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 11:53 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
@legallyblack and anonymous, are you both taking the October test? by the rate of my gains (or lack of gains) and life distractions I'm leaning towards sitting out this cycle and studying harder during the winterlegallyblack wrote:Same, I can learn LG pretty quickly but LR is so nuanced. RC is a toss up depending on how engaging the passage is, much more practice needed.chueca910 wrote:Yeah same, I've gotten pretty good at LG but LR is kicking my butt.
- alpha kenny body
- Posts: 4850
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
What are you not understanding? I never said that they would help you get a job, however, an employer sees that you went to Berkeley for example, and then you tell them that you have family and friends in the Bay Area and you wish to stay there, those factors are valid ties to the region.NigeranOU wrote:The family and friends I have there are predominantly in the Bay Area and I am applying to Berkeley for sure. I don't understand how my friends and family there help me get a job thoughfips tedora wrote:You have family and friends there, plus you would be attending one of those two schools. Typically, those two factors fall under what is called ties to a legal market. HTH. Also, check out lawschoolnumbers.com and search around for each school.NigeranOU wrote:you guys I really don't know if I should apply to UCLA and USC. Everyone says the California law market is extremely hard to break into without ties to the region. I have family and friends there but other than that I don't know any lawyers there. I just feel like it would be a waste of money and I'm already applying to so many schools so I'm seeing where I can skim on the application money. However, what do you guys think of the prospective job opportunities after graduation from either school. how do URMS do in their application cycles? help!
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:34 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
oh okay, so maybe I should apply to UCLA and USC now. do you agree?fips tedora wrote:What are you not understanding? I never said that they would help you get a job, however, an employer sees that you went to Berkeley for example, and then you tell them that you have family and friends in the Bay Area and you wish to stay there, those factors are valid ties to the region.NigeranOU wrote:The family and friends I have there are predominantly in the Bay Area and I am applying to Berkeley for sure. I don't understand how my friends and family there help me get a job thoughfips tedora wrote:You have family and friends there, plus you would be attending one of those two schools. Typically, those two factors fall under what is called ties to a legal market. HTH. Also, check out lawschoolnumbers.com and search around for each school.NigeranOU wrote:you guys I really don't know if I should apply to UCLA and USC. Everyone says the California law market is extremely hard to break into without ties to the region. I have family and friends there but other than that I don't know any lawyers there. I just feel like it would be a waste of money and I'm already applying to so many schools so I'm seeing where I can skim on the application money. However, what do you guys think of the prospective job opportunities after graduation from either school. how do URMS do in their application cycles? help!
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 11:53 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
I know you asked about URM employment specifically, I don't know the answer to that. But have you even looked at the employment statistics of these schools in general? That would be a first step.NigeranOU wrote:oh okay, so maybe I should apply to UCLA and USC now. do you agree?fips tedora wrote:What are you not understanding? I never said that they would help you get a job, however, an employer sees that you went to Berkeley for example, and then you tell them that you have family and friends in the Bay Area and you wish to stay there, those factors are valid ties to the region.NigeranOU wrote:The family and friends I have there are predominantly in the Bay Area and I am applying to Berkeley for sure. I don't understand how my friends and family there help me get a job thoughfips tedora wrote:You have family and friends there, plus you would be attending one of those two schools. Typically, those two factors fall under what is called ties to a legal market. HTH. Also, check out lawschoolnumbers.com and search around for each school.NigeranOU wrote:you guys I really don't know if I should apply to UCLA and USC. Everyone says the California law market is extremely hard to break into without ties to the region. I have family and friends there but other than that I don't know any lawyers there. I just feel like it would be a waste of money and I'm already applying to so many schools so I'm seeing where I can skim on the application money. However, what do you guys think of the prospective job opportunities after graduation from either school. how do URMS do in their application cycles? help!
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:34 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
http://weblaw.usc.edu/careers/statistics/chueca910 wrote:I know you asked about URM employment specifically, I don't know the answer to that. But have you even looked at the employment statistics of these schools in general? That would be a first step.NigeranOU wrote:oh okay, so maybe I should apply to UCLA and USC now. do you agree?fips tedora wrote:What are you not understanding? I never said that they would help you get a job, however, an employer sees that you went to Berkeley for example, and then you tell them that you have family and friends in the Bay Area and you wish to stay there, those factors are valid ties to the region.NigeranOU wrote:The family and friends I have there are predominantly in the Bay Area and I am applying to Berkeley for sure. I don't understand how my friends and family there help me get a job thoughfips tedora wrote:You have family and friends there, plus you would be attending one of those two schools. Typically, those two factors fall under what is called ties to a legal market. HTH. Also, check out lawschoolnumbers.com and search around for each school.NigeranOU wrote:you guys I really don't know if I should apply to UCLA and USC. Everyone says the California law market is extremely hard to break into without ties to the region. I have family and friends there but other than that I don't know any lawyers there. I just feel like it would be a waste of money and I'm already applying to so many schools so I'm seeing where I can skim on the application money. However, what do you guys think of the prospective job opportunities after graduation from either school. how do URMS do in their application cycles? help!
https://law.ucla.edu/careers/employment-statistics/
the majority of their classes are places into big law so I will definitely be applying
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:15 pm
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
I am taking in October for the 1st time. Really intense studying until I start classes in four weeks and then its a balancing act. If I don't have good odds this cycle, ill likely work for a year and then reapply.chueca910 wrote:@legallyblack and anonymous, are you both taking the October test? by the rate of my gains (or lack of gains) and life distractions I'm leaning towards sitting out this cycle and studying harder during the winterlegallyblack wrote:Same, I can learn LG pretty quickly but LR is so nuanced. RC is a toss up depending on how engaging the passage is, much more practice needed.chueca910 wrote:Yeah same, I've gotten pretty good at LG but LR is kicking my butt.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 11:53 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
oh ok, well best of luck! I'm most def pushing my test date back. Remember to take moments to breathe and relax, those are just as necessary as the prep!legallyblack wrote:I am taking in October for the 1st time. Really intense studying until I start classes in four weeks and then its a balancing act. If I don't have good odds this cycle, ill likely work for a year and then reapply.chueca910 wrote:@legallyblack and anonymous, are you both taking the October test? by the rate of my gains (or lack of gains) and life distractions I'm leaning towards sitting out this cycle and studying harder during the winterlegallyblack wrote:Same, I can learn LG pretty quickly but LR is so nuanced. RC is a toss up depending on how engaging the passage is, much more practice needed.chueca910 wrote:Yeah same, I've gotten pretty good at LG but LR is kicking my butt.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 11:53 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
try this instead: http://www.lstscorereports.com/compare/ ... /berkeley/NigeranOU wrote:http://weblaw.usc.edu/careers/statistics/chueca910 wrote:I know you asked about URM employment specifically, I don't know the answer to that. But have you even looked at the employment statistics of these schools in general? That would be a first step.NigeranOU wrote:oh okay, so maybe I should apply to UCLA and USC now. do you agree?fips tedora wrote:What are you not understanding? I never said that they would help you get a job, however, an employer sees that you went to Berkeley for example, and then you tell them that you have family and friends in the Bay Area and you wish to stay there, those factors are valid ties to the region.NigeranOU wrote:The family and friends I have there are predominantly in the Bay Area and I am applying to Berkeley for sure. I don't understand how my friends and family there help me get a job thoughfips tedora wrote:You have family and friends there, plus you would be attending one of those two schools. Typically, those two factors fall under what is called ties to a legal market. HTH. Also, check out lawschoolnumbers.com and search around for each school.NigeranOU wrote:you guys I really don't know if I should apply to UCLA and USC. Everyone says the California law market is extremely hard to break into without ties to the region. I have family and friends there but other than that I don't know any lawyers there. I just feel like it would be a waste of money and I'm already applying to so many schools so I'm seeing where I can skim on the application money. However, what do you guys think of the prospective job opportunities after graduation from either school. how do URMS do in their application cycles? help!
https://law.ucla.edu/careers/employment-statistics/
the majority of their classes are places into big law so I will definitely be applying
-
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:45 am
Re: URM 2015-2016 Cycle Thread
Rising 2L at Penn here. I check this out periodically, but if you need some advice, let me know. This forum was helpful during my application process and I want to return the favor.