Yeah there might be a better boost for men than women dude to supply and demand but it is likely a small difference.KillaKam92 wrote:Yeah I think it would make sense that AA males get a slightly bigger boost than AA females but I don't think the difference would be drastic. There are definitely more of the latter who graduate from college and look to become professionals in different fields i.e. go to law school. A lot of issues why that is but no real need to discuss the obviousbrinicolec wrote:Also, anyone finding it increasingly difficult to listen to anecdotal stuff as you come to the realization that every cycle varies significantly for URMs AND also, I suspect there is a difference in URM boosts based on gender... which would make sense. Black women are some of the most educated in America whereas black men tend to not be as represented in higher education.
URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 4:51 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Well the latter is known. There is a bigger boost overall for AA Males. That's not anything new.brinicolec wrote:Also, anyone finding it increasingly difficult to listen to anecdotal stuff as you come to the realization that every cycle varies significantly for URMs AND also, I suspect there is a difference in URM boosts based on gender... which would make sense. Black women are some of the most educated in America whereas black men tend to not be as represented in higher education.
Also, while it is true Black women tend to have more degrees on average, to correlate that to being "more educated" is dangerous. They often get more degrees because they need them to advance, as they often aren't as employed. It's a sad situation.
As for the anecdotal stuff, I mean it's an Internet forum. Take everything with a grain of salt. That being said, (and please forgive me if I'm being a little harsh or showing a lack of empathy) - you've already received acceptance to 2 T14 schools. There are people on this forum who won't receive any. You're GPA isn't the highest (and neither it's mine, way lower than yours lol) so the LSAT and the essays play a huge role for us. I also remember reading that you didn't feel comfortable talking about about a certain situation affecting your GPA, so you didn't include it.
I don't know for certain if that was a mistake, but earlier this week I was told by an advisor my GPA addendum neede to include some uncomfortable details. I wrote every school I applied to to see if they would accept one, and they all agreed. Let's just say, it definitely helped. ALOT!!
You can't skimp out I guess and then be surprised at the results. We're already below the normal stats as it is. I'm not trying to get at you at all. But I think as URMs we can't be feeling entitled. These schools don't owe us anything.
I don't think this cycle is that much different. I'm seeing some URMs actually get consideration where historically they haven't. I'm super impressed with Chukes cycle and Stephylynettes ( I hope I spelled that right!) but I also have no doubt that they're essays were absolutely fire. Im also very happy for lsnl ( I know I'm misspelling that as well). He overcame a lower GPA and got into fantastic schools. I would suggest asking them for advice, they all clearly over performed their numbers and I'm sure they have great insight.
And if all else fails, you can always reapply. But be proud! Two acceptances-regardless of sticker at Michigan- is a blessing. I would
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I'm really not shy, so the issue I chose not to discuss is mental health-related. I have a diagnosed mood disorder. Seems to be controversial in the realm of the legal world, which is why I left it out. I, by no means, am complaining about my choices. Ultimately, I've decided against any school at sticker & have become content with the idea of somewhere outside of T14s but max of 25. My comment about anecdotal stuff was mostly regarding people who are like "WHAT! NO! Don't go outside of T14! Retake! Your cycle is weird!" Like damn. Can y'all let me be content with outside of T14 for less debt or nah?!?! Lol.Hi-So - ArshavinFan wrote:Well the latter is known. There is a bigger boost overall for AA Males. That's not anything new.brinicolec wrote:Also, anyone finding it increasingly difficult to listen to anecdotal stuff as you come to the realization that every cycle varies significantly for URMs AND also, I suspect there is a difference in URM boosts based on gender... which would make sense. Black women are some of the most educated in America whereas black men tend to not be as represented in higher education.
Also, while it is true Black women tend to have more degrees on average, to correlate that to being "more educated" is dangerous. They often get more degrees because they need them to advance, as they often aren't as employed. It's a sad situation.
As for the anecdotal stuff, I mean it's an Internet forum. Take everything with a grain of salt. That being said, (and please forgive me if I'm being a little harsh or showing a lack of empathy) - you've already received acceptance to 2 T14 schools. There are people on this forum who won't receive any. You're GPA isn't the highest (and neither it's mine, way lower than yours lol) so the LSAT and the essays play a huge role for us. I also remember reading that you didn't feel comfortable talking about about a certain situation affecting your GPA, so you didn't include it.
I don't know for certain if that was a mistake, but earlier this week I was told by an advisor my GPA addendum neede to include some uncomfortable details. I wrote every school I applied to to see if they would accept one, and they all agreed. Let's just say, it definitely helped. ALOT!!
You can't skimp out I guess and then be surprised at the results. We're already below the normal stats as it is. I'm not trying to get at you at all. But I think as URMs we can't be feeling entitled. These schools don't owe us anything.
I don't think this cycle is that much different. I'm seeing some URMs actually get consideration where historically they haven't. I'm super impressed with Chukes cycle and Stephylynettes ( I hope I spelled that right!) but I also have no doubt that they're essays were absolutely fire. Im also very happy for lsnl ( I know I'm misspelling that as well). He overcame a lower GPA and got into fantastic schools. I would suggest asking them for advice, they all clearly over performed their numbers and I'm sure they have great insight.
And if all else fails, you can always reapply. But be proud! Two acceptances-regardless of sticker at Michigan- is a blessing. I would
Like literally, I have no complaints about my cycle anymore. I don't want to wait another year, so I won't. I don't really want to retake, so I won't. I dont want to take on a lot of debt, even for a T14, so I won't. The pressure to do so on here is kinda excessive sometimes, but I just had to come back to my reality and remember y'all won't be along with me for the ride -- unless we go to the same school, then maybe. Lol
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Pen-pals <3brinicolec wrote:I'm really not shy, so the issue I chose not to discuss is mental health-related. I have a diagnosed mood disorder. Seems to be controversial in the realm of the legal world, which is why I left it out. I, by no means, am complaining about my choices. Ultimately, I've decided against any school at sticker & have become content with the idea of somewhere outside of T14s but max of 25. My comment about anecdotal stuff was mostly regarding people who are like "WHAT! NO! Don't go outside of T14! Retake! Your cycle is weird!" Like damn. Can y'all let me be content with outside of T14 for less debt or nah?!?! Lol.Hi-So - ArshavinFan wrote:Well the latter is known. There is a bigger boost overall for AA Males. That's not anything new.brinicolec wrote:Also, anyone finding it increasingly difficult to listen to anecdotal stuff as you come to the realization that every cycle varies significantly for URMs AND also, I suspect there is a difference in URM boosts based on gender... which would make sense. Black women are some of the most educated in America whereas black men tend to not be as represented in higher education.
Also, while it is true Black women tend to have more degrees on average, to correlate that to being "more educated" is dangerous. They often get more degrees because they need them to advance, as they often aren't as employed. It's a sad situation.
As for the anecdotal stuff, I mean it's an Internet forum. Take everything with a grain of salt. That being said, (and please forgive me if I'm being a little harsh or showing a lack of empathy) - you've already received acceptance to 2 T14 schools. There are people on this forum who won't receive any. You're GPA isn't the highest (and neither it's mine, way lower than yours lol) so the LSAT and the essays play a huge role for us. I also remember reading that you didn't feel comfortable talking about about a certain situation affecting your GPA, so you didn't include it.
I don't know for certain if that was a mistake, but earlier this week I was told by an advisor my GPA addendum neede to include some uncomfortable details. I wrote every school I applied to to see if they would accept one, and they all agreed. Let's just say, it definitely helped. ALOT!!
You can't skimp out I guess and then be surprised at the results. We're already below the normal stats as it is. I'm not trying to get at you at all. But I think as URMs we can't be feeling entitled. These schools don't owe us anything.
I don't think this cycle is that much different. I'm seeing some URMs actually get consideration where historically they haven't. I'm super impressed with Chukes cycle and Stephylynettes ( I hope I spelled that right!) but I also have no doubt that they're essays were absolutely fire. Im also very happy for lsnl ( I know I'm misspelling that as well). He overcame a lower GPA and got into fantastic schools. I would suggest asking them for advice, they all clearly over performed their numbers and I'm sure they have great insight.
And if all else fails, you can always reapply. But be proud! Two acceptances-regardless of sticker at Michigan- is a blessing. I would
Like literally, I have no complaints about my cycle anymore. I don't want to wait another year, so I won't. I don't really want to retake, so I won't. I dont want to take on a lot of debt, even for a T14, so I won't. The pressure to do so on here is kinda excessive sometimes, but I just had to come back to my reality and remember y'all won't be along with me for the ride -- unless we go to the same school, then maybe. Lol
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Thanks for the kind words. I'm very happy with my cycle so far. I honestly didn't know what to expect. I put my apps out there thinking how if I didn't do well I would retake in June. I did work really hard on my essays and made sure to apply early. I made my personal and diversity statements have a clear theme and say what kind of person I am and how that will lead me to succeed. I appreciate all my acceptances because I know they read it and liked me for me. The odds were stacked up and I beat them. I just want to share now and encourage others to apply and not let people put them down. Pour your soul into your essays lol.
-
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
thank you killakam. I heard because of that lawsuit Michigan is banned from using affirmative action and giving a boost to minorities.KillaKam92 wrote:I'd say relax, you definitely got YP'd, nothing to worry about your numbers are incredible. Michigan does give the boost too if your wonderingdyebri wrote:So I'm really confused and nervous about my cycle now. I'm a MA urm with a 3.86 gpa and 170 lsat and was just waitlisted at Michigan. My personal statement was read over by multiple people and same with my diversity statement.
Some people tell me I got waitlisted because of YP but I thought the urm boost would help me more. I was wondering if Michigan is even allowed to give boosts to urm. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I wouldn't be opposed to it lolMr_Chukes wrote:Pen-pals <3brinicolec wrote:I'm really not shy, so the issue I chose not to discuss is mental health-related. I have a diagnosed mood disorder. Seems to be controversial in the realm of the legal world, which is why I left it out. I, by no means, am complaining about my choices. Ultimately, I've decided against any school at sticker & have become content with the idea of somewhere outside of T14s but max of 25. My comment about anecdotal stuff was mostly regarding people who are like "WHAT! NO! Don't go outside of T14! Retake! Your cycle is weird!" Like damn. Can y'all let me be content with outside of T14 for less debt or nah?!?! Lol.Hi-So - ArshavinFan wrote:Well the latter is known. There is a bigger boost overall for AA Males. That's not anything new.brinicolec wrote:Also, anyone finding it increasingly difficult to listen to anecdotal stuff as you come to the realization that every cycle varies significantly for URMs AND also, I suspect there is a difference in URM boosts based on gender... which would make sense. Black women are some of the most educated in America whereas black men tend to not be as represented in higher education.
Also, while it is true Black women tend to have more degrees on average, to correlate that to being "more educated" is dangerous. They often get more degrees because they need them to advance, as they often aren't as employed. It's a sad situation.
As for the anecdotal stuff, I mean it's an Internet forum. Take everything with a grain of salt. That being said, (and please forgive me if I'm being a little harsh or showing a lack of empathy) - you've already received acceptance to 2 T14 schools. There are people on this forum who won't receive any. You're GPA isn't the highest (and neither it's mine, way lower than yours lol) so the LSAT and the essays play a huge role for us. I also remember reading that you didn't feel comfortable talking about about a certain situation affecting your GPA, so you didn't include it.
I don't know for certain if that was a mistake, but earlier this week I was told by an advisor my GPA addendum neede to include some uncomfortable details. I wrote every school I applied to to see if they would accept one, and they all agreed. Let's just say, it definitely helped. ALOT!!
You can't skimp out I guess and then be surprised at the results. We're already below the normal stats as it is. I'm not trying to get at you at all. But I think as URMs we can't be feeling entitled. These schools don't owe us anything.
I don't think this cycle is that much different. I'm seeing some URMs actually get consideration where historically they haven't. I'm super impressed with Chukes cycle and Stephylynettes ( I hope I spelled that right!) but I also have no doubt that they're essays were absolutely fire. Im also very happy for lsnl ( I know I'm misspelling that as well). He overcame a lower GPA and got into fantastic schools. I would suggest asking them for advice, they all clearly over performed their numbers and I'm sure they have great insight.
And if all else fails, you can always reapply. But be proud! Two acceptances-regardless of sticker at Michigan- is a blessing. I would
Like literally, I have no complaints about my cycle anymore. I don't want to wait another year, so I won't. I don't really want to retake, so I won't. I dont want to take on a lot of debt, even for a T14, so I won't. The pressure to do so on here is kinda excessive sometimes, but I just had to come back to my reality and remember y'all won't be along with me for the ride -- unless we go to the same school, then maybe. Lol
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:38 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
x
Last edited by lawschool2017712 on Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:05 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I have!lawschool2017712 wrote:Anyone else here that completed their JS1 already?
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I swear every week goes by so fast. Soon out cycled will be over.
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 1:32 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
+1Cbear2017 wrote:I have!lawschool2017712 wrote:Anyone else here that completed their JS1 already?
- OnlyHumean
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:06 am
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I have to. My interviewer was so incredibly nice, I don't know how to read it. I didn't get any of the more challenging questions that others occasionally get either, just really standard stuff.AJ1010 wrote:+1Cbear2017 wrote:I have!lawschool2017712 wrote:Anyone else here that completed their JS1 already?
Still have no idea what it could be that separates those with JS1s who get JS2s from those who don't. It seems like it would be difficult to do particularly bad in such a short, standard interview.
- azaleafire
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 3:37 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Me. I thought she was just being careful when she said it would be a while until I heard...lawschool2017712 wrote:Anyone else here that completed their JS1 already?

- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Shit I hope so lolMr_Chukes wrote:I swear every week goes by so fast. Soon out cycled will be over.
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:02 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
+1 interviewer was nice and talkative, similar to CLS interview.lawschool2017712 wrote:Anyone else here that completed their JS1 already?
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
What schools are you waiting on lolbrinicolec wrote:Shit I hope so lolMr_Chukes wrote:I swear every week goes by so fast. Soon out cycled will be over.
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Mainly Northwestern. The other ones are neither here nor there. That and scholarship info.Mr_Chukes wrote:What schools are you waiting on lolbrinicolec wrote:Shit I hope so lolMr_Chukes wrote:I swear every week goes by so fast. Soon out cycled will be over.
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:38 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
x
Last edited by lawschool2017712 on Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
No.lawschool2017712 wrote:Are you a KJD?brinicolec wrote:Mainly Northwestern. The other ones are neither here nor there. That and scholarship info.Mr_Chukes wrote:What schools are you waiting on lolbrinicolec wrote:Shit I hope so lolMr_Chukes wrote:I swear every week goes by so fast. Soon out cycled will be over.
- sfn91
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:43 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Berkeley dings are out today!
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
It's a pretty big wave. I keep seeing more people add on Law school numbers.sfn91 wrote:Berkeley dings are out today!
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:41 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
Do we think the Berk dings going out today are just for those that didn't go FR? That seems to be the mentality on the Berk 2020 forum. Terrified to check my email either wayMr_Chukes wrote:It's a pretty big wave. I keep seeing more people add on Law school numbers.sfn91 wrote:Berkeley dings are out today!

- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I believe it is.abc12345678 wrote:Do we think the Berk dings going out today are just for those that didn't go FR? That seems to be the mentality on the Berk 2020 forum. Terrified to check my email either wayMr_Chukes wrote:It's a pretty big wave. I keep seeing more people add on Law school numbers.sfn91 wrote:Berkeley dings are out today!
- PrezRand
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
I just saw the berk dings


- sfn91
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:43 pm
Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread
In better news (or perhaps sadder news) AnBryce e-mails are also out.