2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."

Result

Accepted NYC
16
44%
Accepted DC
4
11%
Accepted LA/SF
2
6%
Accepted Dallas/Houston
2
6%
Interview, awaiting
7
19%
interview, denied
3
8%
no interview
2
6%
 
Total votes: 36

DJ JD

Bronze
Posts: 152
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 9:58 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by DJ JD » Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:07 am

DiniMae wrote:
DJ JD wrote:
I heard about it before going into law school. I made the mistake of assuming that the applicant pool was too big, because my LSAT score was pretty crappy and I honestly didn't think I'd get into a good enough school to warrant it (also another wrong assumption).

After jumping through enough hoops to experience the shit-show that is 1LSA interviewing, I really regret not at least trying the program. Knowing classmates that either returned to their firms SEO firms or apparently get preference for other diversity positions will do that to you.

I will say, median at a T25 will not guarantee you a big law job as a URM. The most favorable combination of diversity status will get you some interviews, but honestly, you should all go in thinking you have no advantage, because a blond hair/blue eyes at the top 1/3 will net more interviews than URM at median. URM + Median + T14= Big Law? Maybe. URM + Median + T25 = Big Law? Good look. A regular job, sure, but I wouldn't bank on getting big law from, let's say, Alabama with a 3.25 absent connections, IP, URM, ties, extreme charisma, and a dash of luck to get your resume read. Money's not everything, and BigLaw isn't something everyone wants, but I just want to make sure we're on the right page here.
Thank you! This is exactly the kind of insight that we as 0Ls need.
I can never tell if people are sarcastic on this site, because on one hand, I'm not sure I said anything that's particularly disagreeable and based it on school employment data + my knowledge of several markets, but at the same time, 0Ls (& as it turns out, people in general) are pretty averse to criticism and anything relating to being told "no," so I can imagine someone wanting to argue that anything short of T14 (& maybe UT/Vandy/UCLA) has a reasonably safe bet at getting big law from median.

And to think, before I went to law school, I'd take thank yous for thank yous, and not analyze both sides incessantly.

User avatar
Atmosphere

Silver
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:34 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by Atmosphere » Wed Feb 11, 2015 4:50 am

DJ JD wrote:
DiniMae wrote:
DJ JD wrote:
I heard about it before going into law school. I made the mistake of assuming that the applicant pool was too big, because my LSAT score was pretty crappy and I honestly didn't think I'd get into a good enough school to warrant it (also another wrong assumption).

After jumping through enough hoops to experience the shit-show that is 1LSA interviewing, I really regret not at least trying the program. Knowing classmates that either returned to their firms SEO firms or apparently get preference for other diversity positions will do that to you.

I will say, median at a T25 will not guarantee you a big law job as a URM. The most favorable combination of diversity status will get you some interviews, but honestly, you should all go in thinking you have no advantage, because a blond hair/blue eyes at the top 1/3 will net more interviews than URM at median. URM + Median + T14= Big Law? Maybe. URM + Median + T25 = Big Law? Good look. A regular job, sure, but I wouldn't bank on getting big law from, let's say, Alabama with a 3.25 absent connections, IP, URM, ties, extreme charisma, and a dash of luck to get your resume read. Money's not everything, and BigLaw isn't something everyone wants, but I just want to make sure we're on the right page here.
Thank you! This is exactly the kind of insight that we as 0Ls need.
I can never tell if people are sarcastic on this site, because on one hand, I'm not sure I said anything that's particularly disagreeable and based it on school employment data + my knowledge of several markets, but at the same time, 0Ls (& as it turns out, people in general) are pretty averse to criticism and anything relating to being told "no," so I can imagine someone wanting to argue that anything short of T14 (& maybe UT/Vandy/UCLA) has a reasonably safe bet at getting big law from median.

And to think, before I went to law school, I'd take thank yous for thank yous, and not analyze both sides incessantly.
I think that's a genuine 'thank you'. The information you've provided is definitely something that's not discussed enough on the URM forum

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by DiniMae » Wed Feb 11, 2015 7:36 am

Atmosphere wrote:
DJ JD wrote:
DiniMae wrote:
DJ JD wrote:
I heard about it before going into law school. I made the mistake of assuming that the applicant pool was too big, because my LSAT score was pretty crappy and I honestly didn't think I'd get into a good enough school to warrant it (also another wrong assumption).

After jumping through enough hoops to experience the shit-show that is 1LSA interviewing, I really regret not at least trying the program. Knowing classmates that either returned to their firms SEO firms or apparently get preference for other diversity positions will do that to you.

I will say, median at a T25 will not guarantee you a big law job as a URM. The most favorable combination of diversity status will get you some interviews, but honestly, you should all go in thinking you have no advantage, because a blond hair/blue eyes at the top 1/3 will net more interviews than URM at median. URM + Median + T14= Big Law? Maybe. URM + Median + T25 = Big Law? Good look. A regular job, sure, but I wouldn't bank on getting big law from, let's say, Alabama with a 3.25 absent connections, IP, URM, ties, extreme charisma, and a dash of luck to get your resume read. Money's not everything, and BigLaw isn't something everyone wants, but I just want to make sure we're on the right page here.
Thank you! This is exactly the kind of insight that we as 0Ls need.
I can never tell if people are sarcastic on this site, because on one hand, I'm not sure I said anything that's particularly disagreeable and based it on school employment data + my knowledge of several markets, but at the same time, 0Ls (& as it turns out, people in general) are pretty averse to criticism and anything relating to being told "no," so I can imagine someone wanting to argue that anything short of T14 (& maybe UT/Vandy/UCLA) has a reasonably safe bet at getting big law from median.

And to think, before I went to law school, I'd take thank yous for thank yous, and not analyze both sides incessantly.
I think that's a genuine 'thank you'. The information you've provided is definitely something that's not discussed enough on the URM forum
Thanks, Atmosphere! You know me so well -- that was a genuine thank you. (I try to stay above the fray on TLS; I'm def not the passive-aggressive or sarcastic type).

DJ JD

Bronze
Posts: 152
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 9:58 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by DJ JD » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:48 pm

DiniMae wrote:
Atmosphere wrote: I think that's a genuine 'thank you'. The information you've provided is definitely something that's not discussed enough on the URM forum
Thanks, Atmosphere! You know me so well -- that was a genuine thank you. (I try to stay above the fray on TLS; I'm def not the passive-aggressive or sarcastic type).
Haha, okay.

But yeah, anyways, definitely go through this, regardless of doubts. Besides the fact that it looks good on a resume, it pays pretty well, and really has given the alums a good perspective on what actual practice looks like. It's never a bad thing to know how to do legal research and write briefs before you ever set foot in a class. And the connections… oh the connections.

User avatar
rion91

Silver
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by rion91 » Thu Feb 12, 2015 2:02 pm

How long was it before you guys were contacted after submitting the app?

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by DiniMae » Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:46 pm

rion91 wrote:How long was it before you guys were contacted after submitting the app?
2-3 weeks for me, but I applied mid-round.

User avatar
FairchildFLT

Bronze
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:48 am

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by FairchildFLT » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:46 pm

Applied back in August 14...interviewed a few weeks ago. I didn't get an interview request until I got my first T20 acceptance.

User avatar
FairchildFLT

Bronze
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:48 am

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by FairchildFLT » Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:58 pm

Emailed SEO this morning to make Dallas my number one and Houston my number two.

Thanks for the heads up Dini!

Alhe5015

New
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:26 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by Alhe5015 » Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:33 pm

Just got the interview request for SEO NYC! Submitted couple weeks ago!

User avatar
lokikoala

Bronze
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 7:55 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by lokikoala » Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:05 am

Alhe5015 wrote:Just got the interview request for SEO NYC! Submitted couple weeks ago!
Did they tell you specifically what city you were being considered for?

Alhe5015

New
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:26 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by Alhe5015 » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:53 am

lokikoala wrote:
Alhe5015 wrote:.
Did they tell you specifically what city you were being considered for?
"We are excited to select you for an interview for the Law - NYC internship! Please read this entire email and all instructions before proceeding"

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by DiniMae » Fri Feb 13, 2015 10:43 am

Alhe5015 wrote:
lokikoala wrote:
Alhe5015 wrote:.
Did they tell you specifically what city you were being considered for?
"We are excited to select you for an interview for the Law - NYC internship! Please read this entire email and all instructions before proceeding"
Sorry but that's std language. They insert whatever your top choice is in the email.

isaiah1992

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:41 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by isaiah1992 » Fri Feb 13, 2015 10:50 am

If any one has any questions, I am an SEO alum from this past summer. You can PM me.

humph

New
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 11:30 am

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by humph » Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:15 pm

Just had interview, it was a killer.

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by DiniMae » Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:25 pm

humph wrote:Just had interview, it was a killer.
O no! Do you feel as if you did well? Care to share?

User avatar
Skool

Silver
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:26 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by Skool » Sun Feb 15, 2015 4:56 pm

I'm a little confused about pay for this program. Are you paid like a Summer Associate for all ten weeks of the program? So 3k or so per week?

Or do they simply spread your four week Summer Associate pay over 10 weeks so 1000-1200 per week?

isaiah1992

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:41 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by isaiah1992 » Sun Feb 15, 2015 4:59 pm

Skool wrote:I'm a little confused about pay for this program. Are you paid like a Summer Associate for all ten weeks of the program? So 3k or so per week?

Or do they simply spread your four week Summer Associate pay over 10 weeks so 1000-1200 per week?

you're paid anywhere from 1100-1500 per week depending on the firm. you're paid for 10 weeks.

User avatar
Skool

Silver
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:26 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by Skool » Sun Feb 15, 2015 5:04 pm

Thanks for clarifying.

madhatter2020

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 5:10 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by madhatter2020 » Mon Feb 16, 2015 8:21 am

I also emailed SEO about adding Dallas to my already submitted application. Havemt heard back yet. Has anybody gotten a reply yet to that specific request?

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by DiniMae » Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:17 am

madhatter2020 wrote:I also emailed SEO about adding Dallas to my already submitted application. Havemt heard back yet. Has anybody gotten a reply yet to that specific request?
I haven't gotten a reply about anything.

User avatar
FairchildFLT

Bronze
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:48 am

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by FairchildFLT » Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:41 pm

DiniMae wrote:
madhatter2020 wrote:I also emailed SEO about adding Dallas to my already submitted application. Havemt heard back yet. Has anybody gotten a reply yet to that specific request?
I haven't gotten a reply about anything.
+1 I've never gotten a reply.

User avatar
Tr3

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:25 am

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by Tr3 » Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:47 pm

FairchildFLT wrote:
DiniMae wrote:
madhatter2020 wrote:I also emailed SEO about adding Dallas to my already submitted application. Havemt heard back yet. Has anybody gotten a reply yet to that specific request?
I haven't gotten a reply about anything.
+1 I've never gotten a reply.
A long long time ago I emailed regarding an update to part of my application. I never heard back, but then during an information session (before my actual interview) I asked about that part of my application and they said it had been updated. So perhaps they did make a note on your app and just didn't respond as they did with me.

Edit: I suck at spelling sometimes. (most times)
Last edited by Tr3 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
FairchildFLT

Bronze
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:48 am

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by FairchildFLT » Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:34 pm

Tr3 wrote:
FairchildFLT wrote:
DiniMae wrote:
madhatter2020 wrote:I also emailed SEO about adding Dallas to my already submitted application. Havemt heard back yet. Has anybody gotten a reply yet to that specific request?
I haven't gotten a reply about anything.
+1 I've never gotten a reply.
A long long time ago I email regarding an update to part of my application. I never heard back, but then during an information session (before my actual interview) I asked about that part of my application and they said it had been updated. So perhaps they did make a note on your app and just didn't respond as they did with me.
Yeah this is what I suspect.

xerxes2018

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:06 am

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by xerxes2018 » Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:25 pm

I applied in the 1st round and had my interview within 2 weeks of submitting my app. [T6 LS, Ivy undergrad] I think that it went well, but I haven't received a request for recommendations. Maybe I'm reading too much into this but is the lack of a recommendation request a bad sign? :|

User avatar
FairchildFLT

Bronze
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:48 am

Re: 2015 SEO Corporate Law Applicants

Post by FairchildFLT » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:27 am

xerxes2018 wrote:I applied in the 1st round and had my interview within 2 weeks of submitting my app. [T6 LS, Ivy undergrad] I think that it went well, but I haven't received a request for recommendations. Maybe I'm reading too much into this but is the lack of a recommendation request a bad sign? :|
Edit: #wronginformation
Last edited by FairchildFLT on Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”