You weren't in the right neighborhoods. No place on Earth rivals lower Manhattan.bizzybone1313 wrote:I have never been to California. Do the women really live up to their rep? I have been to NYC many times and I wasn't impressed at all. Most of them looked really pale.
URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I disagreecaliforniauser wrote:You weren't in the right neighborhoods. No place on Earth rivals lower Manhattan.bizzybone1313 wrote:I have never been to California. Do the women really live up to their rep? I have been to NYC many times and I wasn't impressed at all. Most of them looked really pale.
-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Regardless, you can't deny lower Manhattan has the highest concentration of trendy women in the country. That's got to count for somethingMojosodope wrote:I disagreecaliforniauser wrote:You weren't in the right neighborhoods. No place on Earth rivals lower Manhattan.bizzybone1313 wrote:I have never been to California. Do the women really live up to their rep? I have been to NYC many times and I wasn't impressed at all. Most of them looked really pale.

- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Probably the highest concentration of stuck up women as well...goes hand in hand.californiauser wrote:Regardless, you can't deny lower Manhattan has the highest concentration of trendy women in the country. That's got to count for somethingMojosodope wrote:I disagreecaliforniauser wrote:You weren't in the right neighborhoods. No place on Earth rivals lower Manhattan.bizzybone1313 wrote:I have never been to California. Do the women really live up to their rep? I have been to NYC many times and I wasn't impressed at all. Most of them looked really pale.
But honestly they aren't individually trendy, most of them just follow what's in at the time. Being different is a big thing for me when comparing fashion sense.
- Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
[redacted]
Last edited by Dr.Zer0 on Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
That's the definition of trendyMojosodope wrote:Probably the highest concentration of stuck up women as well...goes hand in hand.
But honestly they aren't individually trendy, most of them just follow what's in at the time. Being different is a big thing for me when comparing fashion sense.


- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
That's being a label follower, not being trendy.californiauser wrote:That's the definition of trendyMojosodope wrote:Probably the highest concentration of stuck up women as well...goes hand in hand.
But honestly they aren't individually trendy, most of them just follow what's in at the time. Being different is a big thing for me when comparing fashion sense.. I can always appreciate a girl who is up on the latest Fall Saint Laurent line. To each his own
-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Being trendy is a culmination of flair and an acute knowledge of which trends are relevant and worthy of adopting for one's own personal style.Mojosodope wrote:That's being a label follower, not being trendy.californiauser wrote:That's the definition of trendyMojosodope wrote:Probably the highest concentration of stuck up women as well...goes hand in hand.
But honestly they aren't individually trendy, most of them just follow what's in at the time. Being different is a big thing for me when comparing fashion sense.. I can always appreciate a girl who is up on the latest Fall Saint Laurent line. To each his own
Anyone can buy expensive, popular brands. This in and of itself doesn't make you trendy.
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Dammit, I should have kept the Rothman bit to myself so I could have had a fighting chance at it. 
Also, LA girls are notoriously good-looking.

Also, LA girls are notoriously good-looking.
- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I was mainly talking about thatcaliforniauser wrote:That's the definition of trendyMojosodope wrote:Probably the highest concentration of stuck up women as well...goes hand in hand.
But honestly they aren't individually trendy, most of them just follow what's in at the time. Being different is a big thing for me when comparing fashion sense.. I can always appreciate a girl who is up on the latest Fall Saint Laurent line. To each his own
- Quan292
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 2:03 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Truth!!!!!californiauser wrote:You weren't in the right neighborhoods. No place on Earth rivals lower Manhattan.bizzybone1313 wrote:I have never been to California. Do the women really live up to their rep? I have been to NYC many times and I wasn't impressed at all. Most of them looked really pale.
Lower manhattan and now Fort Greene/ Bedstuy is the home to the best looking women in the world.
-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:29 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
LOL, I mentioned it earlier in the day anyway. Sorry if I blew it up for you. To be honest I don't know why they don't mention that scholarship whenever they send a fee waiver email.twentypercentmore wrote:Dammit, I should have kept the Rothman bit to myself so I could have had a fighting chance at it.
Also, LA girls are notoriously good-looking.
-
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Mojosodope wrote:I was mainly talking about thatcaliforniauser wrote:That's the definition of trendyMojosodope wrote:Probably the highest concentration of stuck up women as well...goes hand in hand.
But honestly they aren't individually trendy, most of them just follow what's in at the time. Being different is a big thing for me when comparing fashion sense.. I can always appreciate a girl who is up on the latest Fall Saint Laurent line. To each his own
It's not about it's about style. Any old girl can see what the latest trend but it takes a special woman to mesh that trend with her personal style.
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Trendy women does not a good wife make.californiauser wrote:Regardless, you can't deny lower Manhattan has the highest concentration of trendy women in the country. That's got to count for somethingMojosodope wrote:I disagreecaliforniauser wrote:You weren't in the right neighborhoods. No place on Earth rivals lower Manhattan.bizzybone1313 wrote:I have never been to California. Do the women really live up to their rep? I have been to NYC many times and I wasn't impressed at all. Most of them looked really pale.
I'm sorry but a considerable number of those women don't know how to cook, keep a clean house or live with a man. Not knocking my gender, but quality women are lacking these days. More are too busy following trends than creating their own path. Herd mentality is not where it's at.
-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I'm taking shots left and right ITT
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Lol, naw, but if you're looking for trendy, don't be surprised if quality goes out the door with that.californiauser wrote:I'm taking shots left and right ITT
Perhaps as you grow older you'll understand the importance of what some are saying here.

-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Trendy doesn't mean dense. There are plenty of exceptionally well-dressed, smart, and career-minded women in New York. That's the type I'd personally prefer.AAJD2B wrote:Lol, naw, but if you're looking for trendy, don't be surprised if quality goes out the door with that.californiauser wrote:I'm taking shots left and right ITT
Perhaps as you grow older you'll understand the importance of what some are saying here.
I like to eat out and take my clothes to the dry-cleaner, I don't need a domestic

- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
mandyjay11 wrote:Mojosodope wrote:I was mainly talking about thatcaliforniauser wrote:That's the definition of trendyMojosodope wrote:Probably the highest concentration of stuck up women as well...goes hand in hand.
But honestly they aren't individually trendy, most of them just follow what's in at the time. Being different is a big thing for me when comparing fashion sense.. I can always appreciate a girl who is up on the latest Fall Saint Laurent line. To each his own
It's not about it's about style. Any old girl can see what the latest trend but it takes a special woman to mesh that trend with her personal style.

- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
But not all trendy women are well dressed.californiauser wrote:Trendy doesn't mean dense. There are plenty of exceptionally well-dressed, smart, and career-minded women in New York. That's the type I'd personally prefer.AAJD2B wrote:Lol, naw, but if you're looking for trendy, don't be surprised if quality goes out the door with that.californiauser wrote:I'm taking shots left and right ITT
Perhaps as you grow older you'll understand the importance of what some are saying here.
I like to eat out and take my clothes to the dry-cleaner, I don't need a domestic
- lemons
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Bey's trendy... look at her being trendy


-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
lemons!lemons wrote:Bey's trendy... look at her being trendy
- lemons
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
heyyyy EvEvMont wrote:lemons!lemons wrote:Bey's trendy... look at her being trendy

-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:29 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
That is the second most terrifying Beyonce gif I have ever seen.lemons wrote:Bey's trendy... look at her being trendy
- lemons
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
i'm wondering what Beyonce gif is more frightening? i have a veritable library of beyonce gifs haha and i'm always looking to add moreMoMettaMonk wrote:That is the second most terrifying Beyonce gif I have ever seen.lemons wrote:Bey's trendy... look at her being trendy

-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:29 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
It was some variation of this one.lemons wrote:i'm wondering what Beyonce gif is more frightening? i have a veritable library of beyonce gifs haha and i'm always looking to add moreMoMettaMonk wrote:That is the second most terrifying Beyonce gif I have ever seen.lemons wrote:Bey's trendy... look at her being trendy
--ImageRemoved--