
URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
just completed my Vandy interview! started rough but ended strong


- okaygo

- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
go you!lemons wrote:just completed my Vandy interview! started rough but ended strong![]()
![]()
![]()
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
okaygo wrote:Do you guys think I need to write a Why X for every school I plan to apply to? I wrote ones for UVA and Georgetown. But don't really want to for GW.
probs not unless you are boarderline on the #s or if they are known for YPing. I would say you should if you are applying to Duke and Penn but I don't know if other T14 schools are known for YP.
-
mandyjay11

- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
lemons wrote:just completed my Vandy interview! started rough but ended strong![]()
![]()
![]()

-
El Principe

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Since no one replied earlier...
3.65/158 AA male. Any shot at UT Austin/Vandy/Lower T14?
3.65/158 AA male. Any shot at UT Austin/Vandy/Lower T14?
- AAJD2B

- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Berkeley.lemons wrote:okaygo wrote:Do you guys think I need to write a Why X for every school I plan to apply to? I wrote ones for UVA and Georgetown. But don't really want to for GW.
probs not unless you are boarderline on the #s or if they are known for YPing. I would say you should if you are applying to Duke and Penn but I don't know if other T14 schools are known for YP.
So despite my disappointing LSAT score I'll send my first batch of apps to Penn, Cornell, and Northwestern. The rest will have to wait for January, including my SEO application.
- AAJD2B

- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I had replied to your situation twice. Apply to UT Austin and Vandy, but I think you should also plan to retake for at least a lower 160s. See below post.El Principe wrote:Since no one replied earlier...
3.65/158 AA male. Any shot at UT Austin/Vandy/Lower T14?
AAJD2B wrote:An AA male with a 3.6/158 then 163 in December landed Stanford, Columbia and NYU last year. Also SEO. He went on to attend NYU as an AnBryce recipient.
All is not lost. January will be late for us but if we can bang it out in December, we still have a decent shot.
- okaygo

- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Gotcha. I'll send one for Duke then.lemons wrote:okaygo wrote:Do you guys think I need to write a Why X for every school I plan to apply to? I wrote ones for UVA and Georgetown. But don't really want to for GW.
probs not unless you are boarderline on the #s or if they are known for YPing. I would say you should if you are applying to Duke and Penn but I don't know if other T14 schools are known for YP.
- okaygo

- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I wonder what dating is like for URMs in law school. Im assuming non existent.
-
californiauser

- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Do you only want to date other law school URMs? I would assume that being a URM male in NYC/Chicago would engender an awesome dating life -- Ann Arbor or Ithaca, not so much, assuming you aren't only interested in URM law students.okaygo wrote:I wonder what dating is like for URMs in law school. Im assuming non existent.
- okaygo

- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Yeah NYC/DC schools are fine..but what about schools like UVA.californiauser wrote:Do you only want to date other law school URMs? I would assume that being a URM male in NYC/Chicago would engender an awesome dating life -- Ann Arbor or Ithaca, not so much, assuming you aren't only interested in URM law students.okaygo wrote:I wonder what dating is like for URMs in law school. Im assuming non existent.
-
El Principe

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Okay, yeah, I should have elaborated. I saw your response to this, but I posted another one a few hrs later asking should I apply to in the mean time... but thanks for replying again. I was scared to apply to UT and Vandy because I think these #s are very borderline, but there aren't many data points for AA males at those schools with my score on all the websites that track that data.AAJD2B wrote:I had replied to your situation twice. Apply to UT Austin and Vandy, but I think you should also plan to retake for at least a lower 160s. See below post.El Principe wrote:Since no one replied earlier...
3.65/158 AA male. Any shot at UT Austin/Vandy/Lower T14?
AAJD2B wrote:An AA male with a 3.6/158 then 163 in December landed Stanford, Columbia and NYU last year. Also SEO. He went on to attend NYU as an AnBryce recipient.
All is not lost. January will be late for us but if we can bang it out in December, we still have a decent shot.
-
El Principe

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Probably not that bad.okaygo wrote:Yeah NYC/DC schools are fine..but what about schools like UVA.californiauser wrote:Do you only want to date other law school URMs? I would assume that being a URM male in NYC/Chicago would engender an awesome dating life -- Ann Arbor or Ithaca, not so much, assuming you aren't only interested in URM law students.okaygo wrote:I wonder what dating is like for URMs in law school. Im assuming non existent.
- AAJD2B

- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
The rule of thumb is to find a potential hubby before law school, especially if you're a black woman. It's cold in the streets of law school and the legal career. Some find love in law school though, and there are numerous affinity group mixers in major cities to meet people.okaygo wrote:Yeah NYC/DC schools are fine..but what about schools like UVA.californiauser wrote:Do you only want to date other law school URMs? I would assume that being a URM male in NYC/Chicago would engender an awesome dating life -- Ann Arbor or Ithaca, not so much, assuming you aren't only interested in URM law students.okaygo wrote:I wonder what dating is like for URMs in law school. Im assuming non existent.
UVA isn't the best place for single black women I am told. Chicago, NYC and Philly are more appreciative of our hue.
-
californiauser

- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Really? Law school seems like a great place to find a husband.AAJD2B wrote:The rule of thumb is to find a potential hubby before law school, especially if you're a black woman. It's cold in the streets of law school and the legal career. Some find love in law school though, and there are numerous affinity group mixers in major cities to meet people.okaygo wrote:Yeah NYC/DC schools are fine..but what about schools like UVA.californiauser wrote:Do you only want to date other law school URMs? I would assume that being a URM male in NYC/Chicago would engender an awesome dating life -- Ann Arbor or Ithaca, not so much, assuming you aren't only interested in URM law students.okaygo wrote:I wonder what dating is like for URMs in law school. Im assuming non existent.
UVA isn't the best place for single black women I am told. Chicago, NYC and Philly are more appreciative of our hue.
- AAJD2B

- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I'm in a similar boat as you and will be sending apps out to the lower T14 and blanket elsewhere following my December retake. So long as you know you can do better, absolutely retake.El Principe wrote:Okay, yeah, I should have elaborated. I saw your response to this, but I posted another one a few hrs later asking should I apply to in the mean time... but thanks for replying again. I was scared to apply to UT and Vandy because I think these #s are very borderline, but there aren't many data points for AA males at those schools with my score on all the websites that track that data.AAJD2B wrote:I had replied to your situation twice. Apply to UT Austin and Vandy, but I think you should also plan to retake for at least a lower 160s. See below post.El Principe wrote:Since no one replied earlier...
3.65/158 AA male. Any shot at UT Austin/Vandy/Lower T14?
AAJD2B wrote:An AA male with a 3.6/158 then 163 in December landed Stanford, Columbia and NYU last year. Also SEO. He went on to attend NYU as an AnBryce recipient.
All is not lost. January will be late for us but if we can bang it out in December, we still have a decent shot.
- okaygo

- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
LAAAAAAWD. I just feel like I need to stay in these big cities. I don't want to be tucked in the middle of nowhere Virginia.
And its not that I'm personally opposed to dating non-URMs, but nonURMs dating me is a horse of a different color.
And its not that I'm personally opposed to dating non-URMs, but nonURMs dating me is a horse of a different color.
-
El Principe

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Idk about lawyers in general, but there are a lot of successful black people with money in VA, so if you're willing to move out of the law bubble, I'm sure you can find someone.AAJD2B wrote:The rule of thumb is to find a potential hubby before law school, especially if you're a black woman. It's cold in the streets of law school and the legal career. Some find love in law school though, and there are numerous affinity group mixers in major cities to meet people.okaygo wrote:Yeah NYC/DC schools are fine..but what about schools like UVA.californiauser wrote:Do you only want to date other law school URMs? I would assume that being a URM male in NYC/Chicago would engender an awesome dating life -- Ann Arbor or Ithaca, not so much, assuming you aren't only interested in URM law students.okaygo wrote:I wonder what dating is like for URMs in law school. Im assuming non existent.
UVA isn't the best place for single black women I am told. Chicago, NYC and Philly are more appreciative of our hue.
- AAJD2B

- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
California, it really isn't. The attitudes of law school students usually suck and most folks (including a number of black males at top law schools) aren't checking for black women. Real talk.
-
californiauser

- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Interesting. Is this hearsay or do you know any black law students? I would imagine that URMs in law school would stick together, fostering closer relationships than other academic programs.AAJD2B wrote:California, it really isn't. The attitudes of law school students usually suck and most folks (including a number of black males at top law schools) aren't checking for black women. Real talk.
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
yeah, i'm hoping law school is going to be a good place to find a hubby... i can't imagine trying to date as an associate or really any type of entry level attorney position so it's now or never!californiauser wrote:Really? Law school seems like a great place to find a husband.
-
mandyjay11

- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
AAJD2B wrote:California, it really isn't. The attitudes of law school students usually suck and most folks (including a number of black males at top law schools) aren't checking for black women. Real talk.
I hate to say this but I agree. There are some who do but it's so rare that it's not worth risking it. I also have considered and tried dating non-URMs and that did not go over well for me.
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
.AAJD2B wrote:California, it really isn't. The attitudes of law school students usually suck and most folks (including a number of black males at top law schools) aren't checking for black women. Real talk.
Last edited by lemons on Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
- lemons

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
yeah, i will second that.. i dated a white guy for a little bit who seemed to really understand marginality but he was super uncomfortable being with my URM friends. he talked the talk but did not walk the walkmandyjay11 wrote:AAJD2B wrote:California, it really isn't. The attitudes of law school students usually suck and most folks (including a number of black males at top law schools) aren't checking for black women. Real talk.
I hate to say this but I agree. There are some who do but it's so rare that it's not worth risking it. I also have considered and tried dating non-URMs and that did not go over well for me.
-
El Principe

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Yeah, I feel embarrassed bc I never took a full practice testAAJD2B wrote:I'm in a similar boat as you and will be sending apps out to the lower T14 and blanket elsewhere following my December retake. So long as you know you can do better, absolutely retake.El Principe wrote:Okay, yeah, I should have elaborated. I saw your response to this, but I posted another one a few hrs later asking should I apply to in the mean time... but thanks for replying again. I was scared to apply to UT and Vandy because I think these #s are very borderline, but there aren't many data points for AA males at those schools with my score on all the websites that track that data.AAJD2B wrote:I had replied to your situation twice. Apply to UT Austin and Vandy, but I think you should also plan to retake for at least a lower 160s. See below post.El Principe wrote:Since no one replied earlier...
3.65/158 AA male. Any shot at UT Austin/Vandy/Lower T14?
AAJD2B wrote:An AA male with a 3.6/158 then 163 in December landed Stanford, Columbia and NYU last year. Also SEO. He went on to attend NYU as an AnBryce recipient.
All is not lost. January will be late for us but if we can bang it out in December, we still have a decent shot.