URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."

Which of these April ASWs do you plan to attend?

Yale (4/16-4/18)
5
16%
Stanford (4/25-4/27)
5
16%
Harvard (4/18-4/20)
10
32%
Chicago (4/9-4/11)
4
13%
NYU (4/16-4/17
1
3%
Penn (4/13)
1
3%
Michigan (4/9-4/11)
2
6%
Northwestern (4/10-4/11)
2
6%
Cornell (4/17)
1
3%
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
cc78

Silver
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:00 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by cc78 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:38 pm

Yeah, and sorry for screwing up the quoting in my last post. NYU losing 28 folks is basically them holding on as tight as possible to that 170.

User avatar
Tr3

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:25 am

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Tr3 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:53 pm

In at Cornell!

User avatar
cc78

Silver
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:00 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by cc78 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:55 pm

Tr3 wrote:In at Cornell!
Congrats!

User avatar
ballcaps

Silver
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:20 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by ballcaps » Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:55 pm

Tr3 wrote:In at Cornell!
whammy!

damn, this thread is murderous.

User avatar
Skool

Silver
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:26 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Skool » Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:56 pm

lc39 wrote:Yeah I'd guess that the 5+ point gains/losses are more significant and the others are just fluctuations/noise.
Yeah, UVA losing 20+ two years in a row though, that sounds like a problem....

NYU and Columbia though, it looks like they're swinging back and forth in class size to hold medians. Definitely interested in seeing how much room there is for below median urms this year.

User avatar
gamerish

Gold
Posts: 3128
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:37 pm

Post removed...

Post by gamerish » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:10 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by gamerish on Sun Jan 03, 2016 2:10 am, edited 7 times in total.

LoganCouture

Gold
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by LoganCouture » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:11 pm

Skool wrote:
lc39 wrote:Yeah I'd guess that the 5+ point gains/losses are more significant and the others are just fluctuations/noise.
Yeah, UVA losing 20+ two years in a row though, that sounds like a problem....

NYU and Columbia though, it looks like they're swinging back and forth in class size to hold medians. Definitely interested in seeing how much room there is for below median urms this year.
+1. Will be interesting to see how the cycle plays out.

Congrats Tr3 on Cornell!

User avatar
Tr3

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:25 am

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Tr3 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:13 pm

Thank you, all!!

User avatar
Skool

Silver
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:26 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Skool » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:19 pm

gamerish wrote:Does the ABA/LSAC/Spivey/etc ever breakdown changes in scores amongst URMs by year or cycle (so there's some way to know if the number of URMs scoring 170+ decreased as well)?
I haven't seen that kind of break down, but the decline in African American applicants has been pretty consistent with the decline in White applicants. I don't immediately see a reason why the ratio of black 170s and 160s would be different than the ratio of white 170s and 160s. But who knows.

Just speaking for AAs, there are so few black 170s (and 160s, actually) that I'm not sure how far there is to go.

User avatar
gamerish

Gold
Posts: 3128
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:37 pm

Post removed...

Post by gamerish » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:20 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by gamerish on Sun Jan 03, 2016 2:10 am, edited 8 times in total.

LoganCouture

Gold
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by LoganCouture » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:30 pm

gamerish wrote:Ah, that's unfortunate. Numbers for PR/MA applicants (myself) are hard enough to find as it is.
+1

I remember staring at LSN being like...there's nothing here.

User avatar
ballcaps

Silver
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:20 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by ballcaps » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:44 pm

lc39 wrote:
gamerish wrote:Ah, that's unfortunate. Numbers for PR/MA applicants (myself) are hard enough to find as it is.
+1

I remember staring at LSN being like...there's nothing here.
just means we're a bunch of special snowflakes AMIRITE???!

User avatar
Flokkness

Bronze
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:26 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Flokkness » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:49 pm

Tr3 wrote:In at Cornell!
All right all right!

In at NW this week. Still leaning UVA.

Agree on the limited info out there. Its really bad. Gotta be sure to leave our completed cycles on LSN for posterity.

03282016

Gold
Posts: 4985
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 12:52 am

[s][/s]

Post by 03282016 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:52 pm

Last edited by 03282016 on Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jw316

Silver
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:29 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by jw316 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:54 pm

Wahrheit wrote:UVA just sent me a fee waiver, so don't stress too hard.
Solicited or via CRS? And what time if you don't mind me asking? I've been waiting for one

LoganCouture

Gold
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by LoganCouture » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:55 pm

Flokkness wrote:
Tr3 wrote:In at Cornell!
All right all right!

In at NW this week. Still leaning UVA.

Agree on the limited info out there. Its really bad. Gotta be sure to leave our completed cycles on LSN for posterity.
Congrats on Northwestern!!

03282016

Gold
Posts: 4985
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 12:52 am

[s][/s]

Post by 03282016 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:59 pm

Last edited by 03282016 on Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jw316

Silver
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:29 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by jw316 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:00 pm

Wahrheit wrote:
jw316 wrote:
Wahrheit wrote:UVA just sent me a fee waiver, so don't stress too hard.
Solicited or via CRS? And what time if you don't mind me asking? I've been waiting for one
CRS, within the last hour.
Thanks! Just checked my email and got it via CRS as well

User avatar
jw316

Silver
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:29 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by jw316 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:19 pm

ballcaps wrote:
lc39 wrote:
gamerish wrote:Ah, that's unfortunate. Numbers for PR/MA applicants (myself) are hard enough to find as it is.
+1

I remember staring at LSN being like...there's nothing here.
just means we're a bunch of special snowflakes AMIRITE???!
Check your PM's when you get a chance please

User avatar
Atmosphere

Silver
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:34 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Atmosphere » Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:32 pm

UVA offered me a fee waiver this late in the game

CRS btw

User avatar
Atmosphere

Silver
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:34 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Atmosphere » Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:34 pm

Tr3 wrote:In at Cornell!
Congrats!!

User avatar
Tr3

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:25 am

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Tr3 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:39 pm

Thanks Flokkness and Atmosphere!

Woohooo Flockkness for NW!

Shout out to my Latin@s!! =) ...but agreed, it's been difficult to find data other than "If you're MA/PR you get a boost, but not as much as AA". (and I still don't know what data backs that up).

The LSAT data on Latinos is interesting because IIRC, they changed from tracking Latinos, to MA/PR. Or something like that. I don't remember where I saw that.

LoganCouture

Gold
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by LoganCouture » Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:42 pm

Tr3 wrote:Thanks Flokkness and Atmosphere!

Woohooo Flockkness for NW!

Shout out to my Latin@s!! =) ...but agreed, it's been difficult to find data other than "If you're MA/PR you get a boost, but not as much as AA". (and I still don't know what data backs that up).

The LSAT data on Latinos is interesting because IIRC, they changed from tracking Latinos, to MA/PR. Or something like that. I don't remember where I saw that.
They track PR separately but MA are included in the Latino group.

You don't know what data backs up the boost for MA/PR? Or backs up the fact that it's smaller than AA?

User avatar
Tr3

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:25 am

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Tr3 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:53 pm

lc39 wrote:
Tr3 wrote:Thanks Flokkness and Atmosphere!

Woohooo Flockkness for NW!

Shout out to my Latin@s!! =) ...but agreed, it's been difficult to find data other than "If you're MA/PR you get a boost, but not as much as AA". (and I still don't know what data backs that up).

The LSAT data on Latinos is interesting because IIRC, they changed from tracking Latinos, to MA/PR. Or something like that. I don't remember where I saw that.
They track PR separately but MA are included in the Latino group.

You don't know what data backs up the boost for MA/PR? Or backs up the fact that it's smaller than AA?
The boost. I guess particularly for MA/PR over other Latinos. I guess data can be found by looking at LSN, but I've never seen an official report with numbers or something that says other Latinos don't get a boost. Perhaps I just haven't looked hard enough?

LoganCouture

Gold
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by LoganCouture » Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:19 pm

Tr3 wrote:
lc39 wrote:
Tr3 wrote:Thanks Flokkness and Atmosphere!

Woohooo Flockkness for NW!

Shout out to my Latin@s!! =) ...but agreed, it's been difficult to find data other than "If you're MA/PR you get a boost, but not as much as AA". (and I still don't know what data backs that up).

The LSAT data on Latinos is interesting because IIRC, they changed from tracking Latinos, to MA/PR. Or something like that. I don't remember where I saw that.
They track PR separately but MA are included in the Latino group.

You don't know what data backs up the boost for MA/PR? Or backs up the fact that it's smaller than AA?
The boost. I guess particularly for MA/PR over other Latinos. I guess data can be found by looking at LSN, but I've never seen an official report with numbers or something that says other Latinos don't get a boost. Perhaps I just haven't looked hard enough?
I don't know if there's data on it besides LSN and cases like Grutter v. Bollinger which specifically name PR and MA as groups that receive preference due to affirmative action.

That and I think some Latinx groups are over-represented in law school when compared to their %age of the U.S. population as a whole (e.g. white Cubans).

On the whole I think law schools don't always care. I know not all of my apps asked for my specific Latinx group.

T14 schools:

Yale - doesn't ask for any race/ethnicity info.
Harvard - only asks Hispanic/Latino, not specific group.
Stanford - asks for Hispanic/Latino and specific group.
UChi - asks for Hispanic/Latino and specific group.
Col - asks for Hispanic/Latino and specific group.
NYU - only asks Hispanic/Latino, not specific group.
Penn - asks for Hispanic/Latino and specific group.
UVA - asks for Hispanic/Latino and specific group.
Berkeley - "answer suppressed" when I go back and look at my app.
Mich - only asks Hispanic/Latino, not specific group.
Duke - only asks Hispanic/Latino, not specific group.
NU - only asks Hispanic/Latino, not specific group.
Cornell - asks for Hispanic/Latino and specific group.
GULC - only asks Hispanic/Latino, not specific group.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”