Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan Forum
- meeseeks
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am
Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Looking for some input here as it's almost decision time.
COA after scholarships
Columbia - 189,000
Penn - 189,000
Michigan - 144,000
Cost will be paid with loans.
From the midwest with ties to Chicago. Open to work anywhere although NYC would not be my first choice.
General career goals: Fed. Clerkship (assuming grades don't rule this out) --> Biglaw --> BigFed
LSAT: 174 (taken twice)
GPA: 3.31
Michigan is hands down the cheapest but I am definitely worried about their Biglaw + Fed. Clerkship rate compared to the other two options.
COA after scholarships
Columbia - 189,000
Penn - 189,000
Michigan - 144,000
Cost will be paid with loans.
From the midwest with ties to Chicago. Open to work anywhere although NYC would not be my first choice.
General career goals: Fed. Clerkship (assuming grades don't rule this out) --> Biglaw --> BigFed
LSAT: 174 (taken twice)
GPA: 3.31
Michigan is hands down the cheapest but I am definitely worried about their Biglaw + Fed. Clerkship rate compared to the other two options.
Last edited by meeseeks on Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- shehulk16
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:20 am
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
wow super similar numbers, outcomes, and goals here. Almost everyone would say that Michigan is the best choice because of your ties to the midwest & Chicago. And a $45,000 difference in debt is nothing to sneeze at, but it will be negligible in the long run of BigLaw salary and/or PSLF forgiveness once you transition to BigFed. I think if you're super debt averse and would like to end up back in Chicago, Michigan is a magnificent option. But Columbia and Penn would offer you more security in terms of BigLaw exit options. But if you don't like NYC so much, Philly and Ann Arbor are awesome!meeseeks wrote:Looking for some input here as it's almost decision time.
COA after loans
Columbia - 189,000
Penn - 189,000
Michigan - 144,000
Cost will be paid with loans.
From the midwest with ties to Chicago. Open to work anywhere although NYC would not be my first choice.
General career goals: Fed. Clerkship (assuming grades don't rule this out) --> Biglaw --> BigFed
LSAT: 174 (taken twice)
GPA: 3.31
Michigan is hands down the cheapest but I am definitely worried about their Biglaw + Fed. Clerkship rate compared to the other two options.
- SmokeytheBear
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:40 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
With those stated goals + the slight difference in cost between Columbia and Michigan + your stated career preferences, Columbia is the way to go. Columbia grads place well in OC/LA/SF (if you have interest, since you've said you're not too into NYC).meeseeks wrote:Looking for some input here as it's almost decision time.
COA after loans
Columbia - 189,000
Penn - 189,000
Michigan - 144,000
Cost will be paid with loans.
From the midwest with ties to Chicago. Open to work anywhere although NYC would not be my first choice.
General career goals: Fed. Clerkship (assuming grades don't rule this out) --> Biglaw --> BigFed
LSAT: 174 (taken twice)
GPA: 3.31
Michigan is hands down the cheapest but I am definitely worried about their Biglaw + Fed. Clerkship rate compared to the other two options.
Again, while Columbia is going to cost more, the extra price is worth the increased number of outcomes.
- meeseeks
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
This has been my general thought as well. Just wanted to poll the crowd and make sure I wasn't crazy taking on the extra 45k of debt.SmokeytheBear wrote:With those stated goals + the slight difference in cost between Columbia and Michigan + your stated career preferences, Columbia is the way to go. Columbia grads place well in OC/LA/SF (if you have interest, since you've said you're not too into NYC).meeseeks wrote:Looking for some input here as it's almost decision time.
COA after loans
Columbia - 189,000
Penn - 189,000
Michigan - 144,000
Cost will be paid with loans.
From the midwest with ties to Chicago. Open to work anywhere although NYC would not be my first choice.
General career goals: Fed. Clerkship (assuming grades don't rule this out) --> Biglaw --> BigFed
LSAT: 174 (taken twice)
GPA: 3.31
Michigan is hands down the cheapest but I am definitely worried about their Biglaw + Fed. Clerkship rate compared to the other two options.
Again, while Columbia is going to cost more, the extra price is worth the increased number of outcomes.
- SmokeytheBear
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:40 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Yeah man enjoy it. Columbia will set you up for a wonderful professional future. Plus that amount of debt can be serviced in three years with aggressive payments. Enjoy!meeseeks wrote:This has been my general thought as well. Just wanted to poll the crowd and make sure I wasn't crazy taking on the extra 45k of debt.SmokeytheBear wrote:With those stated goals + the slight difference in cost between Columbia and Michigan + your stated career preferences, Columbia is the way to go. Columbia grads place well in OC/LA/SF (if you have interest, since you've said you're not too into NYC).meeseeks wrote:Looking for some input here as it's almost decision time.
COA after loans
Columbia - 189,000
Penn - 189,000
Michigan - 144,000
Cost will be paid with loans.
From the midwest with ties to Chicago. Open to work anywhere although NYC would not be my first choice.
General career goals: Fed. Clerkship (assuming grades don't rule this out) --> Biglaw --> BigFed
LSAT: 174 (taken twice)
GPA: 3.31
Michigan is hands down the cheapest but I am definitely worried about their Biglaw + Fed. Clerkship rate compared to the other two options.
Again, while Columbia is going to cost more, the extra price is worth the increased number of outcomes.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
I'd say it's between Columbia and Penn, because I have an irrational fondness of UPenn.
That said, Penn at the same price as CLS doesn't make a terrible amount of sense.
That said, Penn at the same price as CLS doesn't make a terrible amount of sense.
- meeseeks
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
I tend to agree with you and I think the poll is reflecting that as well.34iplaw wrote:I'd say it's between Columbia and Penn, because I have an irrational fondness of UPenn.
That said, Penn at the same price as CLS doesn't make a terrible amount of sense.
- UVA2B
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Penn and Columbia aren't $45k better than Michigan when your ultimate goal is generic Biglaw imo. You're paying for ~15% more wiggle room in getting your goals, and it's entirely up to you to figure out how much that is worth to you though.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
I would say columbia is a pretty easy winner here. PM if you want to discuss further.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
For going into the federal gov't, Columbia is noticeably better. Also for biglaw its substantially better. Michigan has what, 65% OCI success rate? Maybe 70? CLS at 90 on avg. that's a 20% margin. People pay much more for far less difference on this site. It's a pretty big gap. Easily worth $45k.UVA2B wrote:Penn and Columbia aren't $45k better than Michigan when your ultimate goal is generic Biglaw imo. You're paying for ~15% more wiggle room in getting your goals, and it's entirely up to you to figure out how much that is worth to you though.
- SmokeytheBear
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:40 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Seconded.jbagelboy wrote:For going into the federal gov't, Columbia is noticeably better. Also for biglaw its substantially better. Michigan has what, 65% OCI success rate? Maybe 70? CLS at 90 on avg. that's a 20% margin. People pay much more for far less difference on this site. It's a pretty big gap. Easily worth $45k.UVA2B wrote:Penn and Columbia aren't $45k better than Michigan when your ultimate goal is generic Biglaw imo. You're paying for ~15% more wiggle room in getting your goals, and it's entirely up to you to figure out how much that is worth to you though.
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
I know self selection or whatever, but I don't love Michigan's consistently unimpressive job stats. At this price difference I'd take Columbia.
- UVA2B
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
If we were talking law school-->BigFed, sure. But we're talking about going to Biglaw first. I agree that Columbia is better, but it's still just paying $45k more for ~15% better odds of landing their goal. From there it'll be about their Biglaw experience in getting them into BigFed.SmokeytheBear wrote:Seconded.jbagelboy wrote:For going into the federal gov't, Columbia is noticeably better. Also for biglaw its substantially better. Michigan has what, 65% OCI success rate? Maybe 70? CLS at 90 on avg. that's a 20% margin. People pay much more for far less difference on this site. It's a pretty big gap. Easily worth $45k.UVA2B wrote:Penn and Columbia aren't $45k better than Michigan when your ultimate goal is generic Biglaw imo. You're paying for ~15% more wiggle room in getting your goals, and it's entirely up to you to figure out how much that is worth to you though.
I agree it's better for their goals, I just don't personally think it's worth $45k more. Others can absolutely feel free to disagree, because we're talking about individuals doing cost-benefit analysis that is by definition subjective because of risk aversion, debt aversion, etc.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- UVA2B
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Columbia's Biglaw rate this year was ~80%, which is pretty consistent year over year, and Michigan is consistently at ~65% (health of the economy affecting both of them pretty equally year over year). It's for sure an approximation to say what number of students can get Biglaw out of Columbia, but the same holds true for Michigan.jbagelboy wrote:For going into the federal gov't, Columbia is noticeably better. Also for biglaw its substantially better. Michigan has what, 65% OCI success rate? Maybe 70? CLS at 90 on avg. that's a 20% margin. People pay much more for far less difference on this site. It's a pretty big gap. Easily worth $45k.UVA2B wrote:Penn and Columbia aren't $45k better than Michigan when your ultimate goal is generic Biglaw imo. You're paying for ~15% more wiggle room in getting your goals, and it's entirely up to you to figure out how much that is worth to you though.
You can think I'm wrong here. I just think it's not as simple as Columbia being a clear-cut choice.
- SmokeytheBear
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:40 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
It's certainly not clear cut, it's just given the factors, odds, costs, proximity to good pizza, the better choice (especially given that OP also said he was leaning that way).UVA2B wrote:Columbia's Biglaw rate this year was ~80%, which is pretty consistent year over year, and Michigan is consistently at ~65% (health of the economy affecting both of them pretty equally year over year). It's for sure an approximation to say what number of students can get Biglaw out of Columbia, but the same holds true for Michigan.jbagelboy wrote:For going into the federal gov't, Columbia is noticeably better. Also for biglaw its substantially better. Michigan has what, 65% OCI success rate? Maybe 70? CLS at 90 on avg. that's a 20% margin. People pay much more for far less difference on this site. It's a pretty big gap. Easily worth $45k.UVA2B wrote:Penn and Columbia aren't $45k better than Michigan when your ultimate goal is generic Biglaw imo. You're paying for ~15% more wiggle room in getting your goals, and it's entirely up to you to figure out how much that is worth to you though.
You can think I'm wrong here. I just think it's not as simple as Columbia being a clear-cut choice.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:43 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Columbia places people in NY. Maybe students at Columbia could go elsewhere, but just love NY, who knows. But Columbia's second largest market was a tie between California and DC, each coming in at a whopping 6% of the class.
Columbia is a better school than Michigan, no doubt. But I don't know if the school has connections to all markets quite like Michigan does (Michigan has had to create these out of necessity, not saying Columbia couldn't/doesn't have them as well). So if your goals are Non-NY biglaw > NY Biglaw, it may make sense to go to another school (didn't look up Penn's stats).
Columbia is a better school than Michigan, no doubt. But I don't know if the school has connections to all markets quite like Michigan does (Michigan has had to create these out of necessity, not saying Columbia couldn't/doesn't have them as well). So if your goals are Non-NY biglaw > NY Biglaw, it may make sense to go to another school (didn't look up Penn's stats).
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
I get the logic, but I don't think that Michigan has better national reach than Columbia. If, for example, my goal was a big law job in California, and if you told me that I was going to be median at either CLS or Michigan, I'd probably prefer to be at CLS. The difference is slight--at many law firms it wouldn't matter--but I think CLS has a marginally better rep overall in big law.Fiddlesticks wrote: Columbia is a better school than Michigan, no doubt. But I don't know if the school has connections to all markets quite like Michigan does (Michigan has had to create these out of necessity, not saying Columbia couldn't/doesn't have them as well). So if your goals are Non-NY biglaw > NY Biglaw, it may make sense to go to another school.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- meeseeks
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Thanks for the input everybody! I think Columbia will be the school I go with
- quiver
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Looks like you're going to CLS, OP. But I just wanted to chime in and say I agree with UVA2B here. Essentially, you're looking to go for non-NYC biglaw out of law school; CLS is not worth 45k more for that in my view. That money will seem a lot weightier once you graduate and start making payments.UVA2B wrote:If we were talking law school-->BigFed, sure. But we're talking about going to Biglaw first. I agree that Columbia is better, but it's still just paying $45k more for ~15% better odds of landing their goal. From there it'll be about their Biglaw experience in getting them into BigFed.SmokeytheBear wrote:Seconded.jbagelboy wrote:For going into the federal gov't, Columbia is noticeably better. Also for biglaw its substantially better. Michigan has what, 65% OCI success rate? Maybe 70? CLS at 90 on avg. that's a 20% margin. People pay much more for far less difference on this site. It's a pretty big gap. Easily worth $45k.UVA2B wrote:Penn and Columbia aren't $45k better than Michigan when your ultimate goal is generic Biglaw imo. You're paying for ~15% more wiggle room in getting your goals, and it's entirely up to you to figure out how much that is worth to you though.
I agree it's better for their goals, I just don't personally think it's worth $45k more. Others can absolutely feel free to disagree, because we're talking about individuals doing cost-benefit analysis that is by definition subjective because of risk aversion, debt aversion, etc.
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
For what it's worth, I almost always advocate taking the money, but I think the 45k is worth it here for the downside protection.
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:22 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
What kind of scholarships did this work out to be?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- meeseeks
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
90k from CLSVeil of Ignorance wrote:What kind of scholarships did this work out to be?
75k from Penn
90k from Michigan
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:39 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Columbia is worth the extra. Congrats.
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
I'd at least try to work on Penn and Michigan, because they should be offering larger scholarships than Columbia offered.meeseeks wrote:90k from CLSVeil of Ignorance wrote:What kind of scholarships did this work out to be?
75k from Penn
90k from Michigan
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Columbia vs Penn vs Michigan
Just to back up jb's estimate of Michigan's OCI success rate, I think it's based on an old post where some Michigan guy revealed that career services told them >60% of the people who participated in OCI got an offer, as if this was a good percentage for a T-14.UVA2B wrote:Columbia's Biglaw rate this year was ~80%, which is pretty consistent year over year, and Michigan is consistently at ~65% (health of the economy affecting both of them pretty equally year over year). It's for sure an approximation to say what number of students can get Biglaw out of Columbia, but the same holds true for Michigan.jbagelboy wrote:For going into the federal gov't, Columbia is noticeably better. Also for biglaw its substantially better. Michigan has what, 65% OCI success rate? Maybe 70? CLS at 90 on avg. that's a 20% margin. People pay much more for far less difference on this site. It's a pretty big gap. Easily worth $45k.UVA2B wrote:Penn and Columbia aren't $45k better than Michigan when your ultimate goal is generic Biglaw imo. You're paying for ~15% more wiggle room in getting your goals, and it's entirely up to you to figure out how much that is worth to you though.
You can think I'm wrong here. I just think it's not as simple as Columbia being a clear-cut choice.
Found it:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 6#p8950956
Anyway, I don't think this is super clear-cut either given the aversion to NYC, but I would still lean Columbia here for that much of a safety net.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login