Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan Forum
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
hujl
Last edited by SuperCoolDude on Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- presidentspivey
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:34 am
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
With just generic biglaw goals, I'd go Michigan unless we get an update from NYU.SuperCoolDude wrote:Hi,
Need some help deciding between the following offers. 175 LSAT/3.6x GPA
Harvard - haven't heard from fin aid yet. Not expecting very much.
Chicago/Columbia - $50k scholarship
Michigan - $120k scholarship
Duke/Northwestern - $75k scholarship
NYU - haven't heard
Looking to do a JD/MBA program. Did not apply to MBA programs this year, only the law schools. Goal is to work in BigLaw afterwards and maybe clerkship if possible. Do not have a location preference. Have about $100k in savings from working.
Thanks!
- Dcc617
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
Yep.presidentspivey wrote:With just generic biglaw goals, I'd go Michigan unless we get an update from NYU.SuperCoolDude wrote:Hi,
Need some help deciding between the following offers. 175 LSAT/3.6x GPA
Harvard - haven't heard from fin aid yet. Not expecting very much.
Chicago/Columbia - $50k scholarship
Michigan - $120k scholarship
Duke/Northwestern - $75k scholarship
NYU - haven't heard
Looking to do a JD/MBA program. Did not apply to MBA programs this year, only the law schools. Goal is to work in BigLaw afterwards and maybe clerkship if possible. Do not have a location preference. Have about $100k in savings from working.
Thanks!
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
I assume the clerkship goals mean you want to litigate, so why the MBA?
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
I just want clerkship cause I heard it's prestigious. MBA is for option value.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- quiver
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
This is dumb, but you get points for honesty. I vote for Mich.SuperCoolDude wrote:I just want clerkship cause I heard it's prestigious. MBA is for option value.
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:07 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
an MBA is not worth the money unless you get prestige, so I'd vote NU bc Kellogg kicks the butt of most of the other MBA programs you'd be looking at, since neither Stern nor Columbia is that awesome MBA-rankings wise, Michigan isn't as much a thing and it sounds like Harvard will mean a ton of debt
Edited to add: what I mean is the hard set of skills from an MBA is mostly stuff you can pick up on your own, and it's crazy ass expensive. for it to be meaningful enough to your trajectory that the networking/ resume build is worth it you need a top 5 program, and the others except HBS aren't going to open very much to you that you wouldn't get with just the JD and work experience
Edited once again: just saw chi/ booth is an option, that would work if the extra $25k @ Chi versus NU is ok with your debt ratio
Edited to add: what I mean is the hard set of skills from an MBA is mostly stuff you can pick up on your own, and it's crazy ass expensive. for it to be meaningful enough to your trajectory that the networking/ resume build is worth it you need a top 5 program, and the others except HBS aren't going to open very much to you that you wouldn't get with just the JD and work experience
Edited once again: just saw chi/ booth is an option, that would work if the extra $25k @ Chi versus NU is ok with your debt ratio
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
I've asked my coworkers and they've echoed most of your sentiments. Mainly that anything outside of M7 is not worth going to (maybe even CBS is not worth going to either). Do you know how hard it is to get into the MBA program if you've already been admitted to the JD program? I was at NU's ASW and the Kellogg admissions director said that it's definitely not guaranteed (they had 7 or 8 people apply and he said 4-6 get in each year).
I'm currently leaning towards Harvard primarily cause HBS pwns all the other b schools. But then again I don't know if I could get in even applying from HLS. I don't think debt will be a problem long-term since I'm sure I could make it back eventually.
I'm currently leaning towards Harvard primarily cause HBS pwns all the other b schools. But then again I don't know if I could get in even applying from HLS. I don't think debt will be a problem long-term since I'm sure I could make it back eventually.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
Does anyone know how Harvard's LIPP works with regards to debt from joint degree programs?
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
That's a really expensive option. I wouldn't do it.SuperCoolDude wrote:I just want clerkship cause I heard it's prestigious. MBA is for option value.
- UVA2B
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
This is a really odd question: you want to go strictly into professional degree programs, are focusing on biglaw with the option of corporate work, and want to know if LIPP will cover loans from a joint degree program? Further explanation of your rationale is needed here, because it makes zero sense.SuperCoolDude wrote:Does anyone know how Harvard's LIPP works with regards to debt from joint degree programs?
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
Do you know much about b-school? There are really four tiers that are all basically internally indistinguishable. Wharton/SBS/HBS, rest of M7 (which includes CBS, Kellogg, and Booth), the remaining decent MBA programs, and then regional business schools that don't place into high finance/consulting. The US news rankings do not connote anything meaningfuleck456 wrote:an MBA is not worth the money unless you get prestige, so I'd vote NU bc Kellogg kicks the butt of most of the other MBA programs you'd be looking at, since neither Stern nor Columbia is that awesome MBA-rankings wise, Michigan isn't as much a thing and it sounds like Harvard will mean a ton of debt
Edited to add: what I mean is the hard set of skills from an MBA is mostly stuff you can pick up on your own, and it's crazy ass expensive. for it to be meaningful enough to your trajectory that the networking/ resume build is worth it you need a top 5 program, and the others except HBS aren't going to open very much to you that you wouldn't get with just the JD and work experience
Edited once again: just saw chi/ booth is an option, that would work if the extra $25k @ Chi versus NU is ok with your debt ratio
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 12:12 am
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
This.jbagelboy wrote:Do you know much about b-school? There are really four tiers that are all basically internally indistinguishable. Wharton/SBS/HBS, rest of M7 (which includes CBS, Kellogg, and Booth), the remaining decent MBA programs, and then regional business schools that don't place into high finance/consulting. The US news rankings do not connote anything meaningful
And also, there isn't nearly as much of a need to whore yourself out to 'prestige' if you're pursuing a career based on your MBA--it's much more important to know what kind of career you want (functional role/geography/industry) and then go to a program that is a good fit.
Here's a sample school from each group jbagelboy ID'd.
(Median Base Salary / Median Signing Bonus)
From Harvard/Wharton/Stanford
Wharton - ($125,000 / $25,000)
From the rest of the M7
Columbia - ($125,000 / $25,000)
From the "rest of the decent programs"
Texas - ($115,000 / $25,000)
From the "regional business schools that don't place into high finance/consulting"
Vanderbilt - ($110,000* / $25,000*) *Means, not medians
FWIW, it only takes 2/3 of the time to pursue an MBA vs. a JD, it's hella more fun (unless you're dead set on MBB or high finance), and there's MUCH less stress when recruiting because there's all kinds of opportunities you can pursue...not just "Biglaw or Bust."
We had several "recovering JDs" in my MBA program who were desperate to get out of the legal field. One was even a Harvard grad.
FWIW: I went to one of the "regional" schools...the big scholly money persuaded me to take a hard pass on the 'elite' options, and I don't regret it at all.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
+1 M7 or bust is even dumber than T13/14 or bust.teleste wrote:This.jbagelboy wrote:Do you know much about b-school? There are really four tiers that are all basically internally indistinguishable. Wharton/SBS/HBS, rest of M7 (which includes CBS, Kellogg, and Booth), the remaining decent MBA programs, and then regional business schools that don't place into high finance/consulting. The US news rankings do not connote anything meaningful
And also, there isn't nearly as much of a need to whore yourself out to 'prestige' if you're pursuing a career based on your MBA--it's much more important to know what kind of career you want (functional role/geography/industry) and then go to a program that is a good fit.
Here's a sample school from each group jbagelboy ID'd.
(Median Base Salary / Median Signing Bonus)
From Harvard/Wharton/Stanford
Wharton - ($125,000 / $25,000)
From the rest of the M7
Columbia - ($125,000 / $25,000)
From the "rest of the decent programs"
Texas - ($115,000 / $25,000)
From the "regional business schools that don't place into high finance/consulting"
Vanderbilt - ($110,000* / $25,000*) *Means, not medians
FWIW, it only takes 2/3 of the time to pursue an MBA vs. a JD, it's hella more fun (unless you're dead set on MBB or high finance), and there's MUCH less stress when recruiting because there's all kinds of opportunities you can pursue...not just "Biglaw or Bust."
We had several "recovering JDs" in my MBA program who were desperate to get out of the legal field. One was even a Harvard grad.
FWIW: I went to one of the "regional" schools...the big scholly money persuaded me to take a hard pass on the 'elite' options, and I don't regret it at all.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
That's also part of the reason why I want a JD and do BigLaw. I'm already making $125k with just an undergrad degree so I don't see the point of just getting an MBA and making $125k again after graduating.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
This reasoning is pretty silly. Yes biglaw salaries are higher but (1) you're only gonna be in biglaw for a couple years, after which you'll likely take a pay cut, and (2) a large percent of post-MBA compensation is in bonuses and perks, and compensation can increase rapidly.SuperCoolDude wrote:That's also part of the reason why I want a JD and do BigLaw. I'm already making $125k with just an undergrad degree so I don't see the point of just getting an MBA and making $125k again after graduating.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
Would you take Chicago 150k over Harvard?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
I'm extremely confused by your goals. Do you want to be a lawyer, or just get paid lots and lots of money?
- landshoes
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:17 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
lol why would you ever go to law schoolSuperCoolDude wrote:That's also part of the reason why I want a JD and do BigLaw. I'm already making $125k with just an undergrad degree so I don't see the point of just getting an MBA and making $125k again after graduating.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
The latter. I want to be part of the top 1%. Get rich or die trying mentality. I will do whatever job is necessary. My friend tells me PE is good for that.cavalier1138 wrote:I'm extremely confused by your goals. Do you want to be a lawyer, or just get paid lots and lots of money?
- KMart
- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
makes me think this thread is a joke because honestly don't go unless, for some reason, you completely hate your job. i can't imagine why you want to go. you seem to have it made pretty well off.SuperCoolDude wrote:That's also part of the reason why I want a JD and do BigLaw. I'm already making $125k with just an undergrad degree so I don't see the point of just getting an MBA and making $125k again after graduating.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
It's not a joke I just work as a software engineer at a Big 4 tech company. Most of my friends also make well into the mid to upper six figures without having to work more than 40 hours a week. But it seems like you top out at $200k as a software engineer unless you go into management and I'm not satisfied with that outcome. I'm good at taking tests so I took the LSAT and GMAT and am trying to use that for my benefit.
- RSN
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
Do not go to law school unless you want to practice law. Full stop.SuperCoolDude wrote:It's not a joke I just work as a software engineer at a Big 4 tech company. Most of my friends also make well into the mid to upper six figures without having to work more than 40 hours a week. But it seems like you top out at $200k as a software engineer unless you go into management and I'm not satisfied with that outcome. I'm good at taking tests so I took the LSAT and GMAT and am trying to use that for my benefit.
- KMart
- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: Harvard vs. Chicago vs. Columbia vs. Michigan
RSN wrote:Do not go to law school unless you want to practice law. Full stop.SuperCoolDude wrote:It's not a joke I just work as a software engineer at a Big 4 tech company. Most of my friends also make well into the mid to upper six figures without having to work more than 40 hours a week. But it seems like you top out at $200k as a software engineer unless you go into management and I'm not satisfied with that outcome. I'm good at taking tests so I took the LSAT and GMAT and am trying to use that for my benefit.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:21 pm
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login