UNC v. Wake Forum
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:22 pm
UNC v. Wake
I noticed the new rankings and now I have my worries.
UNC:
- in state tuition
- 15k / year scholarship
Wake:
- full tuition scholarship
Thoughts?
UNC:
- in state tuition
- 15k / year scholarship
Wake:
- full tuition scholarship
Thoughts?
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
what's the total COA for both schools?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:22 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
UNC law
advertised COA: $47,975
tuition: $23,551
Wake law
advertised COA: $66,840
tuition: $44,470
advertised COA: $47,975
tuition: $23,551
Wake law
advertised COA: $66,840
tuition: $44,470
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
I assume you've posted annual numbers. The answer is neither, because you won't be able to pay off that debt.
What are your career goals? GPA/LSAT?
What are your career goals? GPA/LSAT?
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
Wouldn't his debt for wake just be COL?cavalier1138 wrote:I assume you've posted annual numbers. The answer is neither, because you won't be able to pay off that debt.
What are your career goals? GPA/LSAT?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
That's $60k of pointless debt, depending on OP's goals.existentialcrisis wrote:Wouldn't his debt for wake just be COL?cavalier1138 wrote:I assume you've posted annual numbers. The answer is neither, because you won't be able to pay off that debt.
What are your career goals? GPA/LSAT?
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
I agree that there's no way to know if OP should go there without knowing their goals. I was just responding to the point about servicing debt.cavalier1138 wrote:That's $60k of pointless debt, depending on OP's goals.existentialcrisis wrote:Wouldn't his debt for wake just be COL?cavalier1138 wrote:I assume you've posted annual numbers. The answer is neither, because you won't be able to pay off that debt.
What are your career goals? GPA/LSAT?
Also COL in WS is dirt cheap.
- Arculease
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 3:19 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
LOL. No, a full tuition scholarship at Wake Law, and the COL that comes with it, is not pointless. And since OP has in state tuition at UNC, he is presumably a NC resident.cavalier1138 wrote:That's $60k of pointless debt, depending on OP's goals.existentialcrisis wrote:Wouldn't his debt for wake just be COL?cavalier1138 wrote:I assume you've posted annual numbers. The answer is neither, because you won't be able to pay off that debt.
What are your career goals? GPA/LSAT?
NC Resident = REALLY nice options at Wake.
OP - I am a current 1L at Wake on a full tuition scholly. You are going to be just fine. Don't let these Negative Nancies get to you. I am happy to answer any questions you have, just PM me.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:22 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
GPA: 3.6
LSAT: 164
As for career goals: potentially business interest M&A or other transactional type stuff. Honestly, not certain.
LSAT: 164
As for career goals: potentially business interest M&A or other transactional type stuff. Honestly, not certain.
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
This is a little overboard.cavalier1138 wrote:I assume you've posted annual numbers. The answer is neither, because you won't be able to pay off that debt.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
It's a good thing you know the OP's career goals just from... I dunno... mind-melding with the initial post. Is that one of the practical lawyering skills they don't teach in the fancified law schools?Arculease wrote: LOL. No, a full tuition scholarship at Wake Law, and the COL that comes with it, is not pointless. And since OP has in state tuition at UNC, he is presumably a NC resident.
NC Resident = REALLY nice options at Wake.
OP - I am a current 1L at Wake on a full tuition scholly. You are going to be just fine. Don't let these Negative Nancies get to you. I am happy to answer any questions you have, just PM me.
And hey, it turns out the OP is interested in things like M&A. Now where on earth do lawyers do M&A work? Is it in a small firm in Charlotte? Is it in a solo practice? Or is it in biglaw, which the OP has a 12% chance of landing from Wake?
- AT9
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
Don't pay attention to the rankings either way. Schools in this range bounce around all the time.
That said, it looks like Wake would be ~$25K cheaper. Wake seems to make more sense unless you have wealthy family paying the difference. If I wanted to stay in NC above all else, I'd do UNC, but I don't know if I'd spend an extra $25K for it (especially if you already have NC ties, in which case the UNC advantage doesn't matter as much).
Also you can probably avoid 60K in COL debt in Winston-Salem, which is extremely cheap. If you don't do well/hate the idea of being a lawyer after 1L, you could call it quits without a life-ruining amount of debt.
But yeah, goals would be helpful. Neither school is good if you're biglaw or bust. Either option is probably fine if you want smaller firm, DA/public defender, etc.
That said, it looks like Wake would be ~$25K cheaper. Wake seems to make more sense unless you have wealthy family paying the difference. If I wanted to stay in NC above all else, I'd do UNC, but I don't know if I'd spend an extra $25K for it (especially if you already have NC ties, in which case the UNC advantage doesn't matter as much).
Also you can probably avoid 60K in COL debt in Winston-Salem, which is extremely cheap. If you don't do well/hate the idea of being a lawyer after 1L, you could call it quits without a life-ruining amount of debt.
But yeah, goals would be helpful. Neither school is good if you're biglaw or bust. Either option is probably fine if you want smaller firm, DA/public defender, etc.
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
Hinestly, Wfu even with a full ride, is not a good school for those goals. You should retake for T14.trevorthomps wrote:GPA: 3.6
LSAT: 164
As for career goals: potentially business interest M&A or other transactional type stuff. Honestly, not certain.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AT9
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
This is the only worrisome issue. You'll probably get an ok job with manageable debt from either Wake or UNC.trevorthomps wrote: As for career goals: potentially business interest M&A or other transactional type stuff. Honestly, not certain.
But what you just described is typically biglaw work. You'll need to be in the top 20ish percent of your class at either school to have a reasonable shot at biglaw. I'd think harder about what you really want to do before you jump into law school. I'm a Wake 3L so I'm not trying to trash my school and am by no means an automatic "retake" type poster, but retaking for a T14 is the safest option for your stated goals.
But again, you don't really seem sure about what you want, so at least think through your goals.
EDIT: Also, if you haven't already, try to get an idea of what biglaw M&A lawyers do. I haven't talked to many people who enjoy it.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: UNC v. Wake
Hell maybe even a biglaw M&A lawyer will weigh in on these choices.AT9 wrote:try to get an idea of what biglaw M&A lawyers do. I haven't talked to many people who enjoy it.
OP- I would not go to either school if I wanted to do M&A.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
50k debt for a respectable law education in a state where only 45% of people pass the bar now? yeah thats a good investment. there will be options for you.Rigo wrote:This is a little overboard.cavalier1138 wrote:I assume you've posted annual numbers. The answer is neither, because you won't be able to pay off that debt.
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
What is the deal with that? Geez.Johann wrote: 50k debt for a respectable law education in a state where only 45% of people pass the bar now? yeah thats a good investment. there will be options for you.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
probably not getting biglaw M&A. but there are other transactional practices that exist. make sure you're okay with non-M&A/non-biglaw options.AT9 wrote:This is the only worrisome issue. You'll probably get an ok job with manageable debt from either Wake or UNC.trevorthomps wrote: As for career goals: potentially business interest M&A or other transactional type stuff. Honestly, not certain.
But what you just described is typically biglaw work. You'll need to be in the top 20ish percent of your class at either school to have a reasonable shot at biglaw. I'd think harder about what you really want to do before you jump into law school. I'm a Wake 3L so I'm not trying to trash my school and am by no means an automatic "retake" type poster, but retaking for a T14 is the safest option for your stated goals.
But again, you don't really seem sure about what you want, so at least think through your goals.
EDIT: Also, if you haven't already, try to get an idea of what biglaw M&A lawyers do. I haven't talked to many people who enjoy it.
- AT9
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
I've heard they're trying to make the NC bar more difficult, probably because there are probably 3 too many law schools in this state. Maybe the Feb. exam has a disproportionate number of Elon/Charlotte/NC Central takers?Rigo wrote:What is the deal with that? Geez.Johann wrote: 50k debt for a respectable law education in a state where only 45% of people pass the bar now? yeah thats a good investment. there will be options for you.
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: UNC v. Wake
Wake for about 50k is a pretty great option for a NC resident. Biglaw is not likely though so if you are Biglaw or bust re-take.
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 5:50 am
Re: UNC v. Wake
Biglaw transactional (not M&A) lawyer who went to one of these schools here. Neither will give you a strong shot at a biglaw job. UNC seems to place a lot more in biglaw firms from what I've seen though (I think they benefit by biglaw firms dropping by for OCI while passing through for Duke OCI). I'd retake if serious about M&A. Also, you might what to look into what biglaw transactional practices entail, it's usually not as glamorous as prospective law students think.BigZuck wrote:Hell maybe even a biglaw M&A lawyer will weigh in on these choices.AT9 wrote:try to get an idea of what biglaw M&A lawyers do. I haven't talked to many people who enjoy it.
OP- I would not go to either school if I wanted to do M&A.
If you aren't serious about M&A and would be fine working for a smaller firm or in public interest, then Wake and UNC are both great options, especially if you are looking to stay in NC. I'd lean towards Wake if you are okay with small law and a lower shot at biglaw because Winston is dirt cheap and the full tuition scholarship.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login