Transfer to Michigan or UCLA Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
Dynamite

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:01 pm

Transfer to Michigan or UCLA

Post by Dynamite » Thu Jun 30, 2016 12:33 pm

I am currently at a 40s school and am committed to transferring up. So far, I have been accepted to Michigan and UCLA. Which one should I choose, and why? I'm waiting to hear from Berkeley and Stanford. At this point, I am inclined to attend Michigan.

My goal is to work in Bay Area IP big law. I'm currently completing a 1L SA doing just that.

Shootin

New
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:16 am

Re: Transfer to Michigan or UCLA

Post by Shootin » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:15 pm

Unless you get berkeley/stanford I would just stay if you already got great opportunities at your current school. And if you are getting something like full scholly then I would probably just stay either way. Top of the class at any T1 school has pretty much same employment outcomes in terms of big law as virtually any t14. So why pay more if you already got great opportunities?

WheninLaw

Silver
Posts: 620
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:35 pm

Re: Transfer to Michigan or UCLA

Post by WheninLaw » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:28 pm

Dynamite wrote:I am currently at a 40s school and am committed to transferring up. So far, I have been accepted to Michigan and UCLA. Which one should I choose, and why? I'm waiting to hear from Berkeley and Stanford. At this point, I am inclined to attend Michigan.

My goal is to work in Bay Area IP big law. I'm currently completing a 1L SA doing just that.
Assuming your firm will invite you to return, why the hell would you transfer?

Dynamite

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:01 pm

Re: Transfer to Michigan or UCLA

Post by Dynamite » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:31 pm

Shootin wrote:Unless you get berkeley/stanford I would just stay if you already got great opportunities at your current school. And if you are getting something like full scholly then I would probably just stay either way. Top of the class at any T1 school has pretty much same employment outcomes in terms of big law as virtually any t14. So why pay more if you already got great opportunities?
Top 15% but I'm paying sticker at my current school. I feel very lucky that I obtained the 1L SA; I am not taking anything for granted and want to ensure that I can practice big law. I have no confidence of that outcome at my current school.

Dynamite

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:01 pm

Re: Transfer to Michigan or UCLA

Post by Dynamite » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:32 pm

WheninLaw wrote:
Dynamite wrote:I am currently at a 40s school and am committed to transferring up. So far, I have been accepted to Michigan and UCLA. Which one should I choose, and why? I'm waiting to hear from Berkeley and Stanford. At this point, I am inclined to attend Michigan.

My goal is to work in Bay Area IP big law. I'm currently completing a 1L SA doing just that.
Assuming your firm will invite you to return, why the hell would you transfer?
I won't know that outcome until it's too late to transfer. And I would rather have options beyond the one firm where I'm completing an SA.

Dynamite

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:01 pm

Re: Transfer to Michigan or UCLA

Post by Dynamite » Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:33 pm

WheninLaw wrote:
Dynamite wrote:I am currently at a 40s school and am committed to transferring up. So far, I have been accepted to Michigan and UCLA. Which one should I choose, and why? I'm waiting to hear from Berkeley and Stanford. At this point, I am inclined to attend Michigan.

My goal is to work in Bay Area IP big law. I'm currently completing a 1L SA doing just that.
Assuming your firm will invite you to return, why the hell would you transfer?
Also, I would appreciate simply a better quality education; I have been less than satisfied with the offerings at my current school.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”