Emory v Belmont Law Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
j0214f

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:26 pm

Emory v Belmont Law

Post by j0214f » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:38 am

I'm currently weighing a full scholarship and the opportunity to be a research assistant for Alberto Gonzales at Belmont Law in Nashville, which would result in no debt because I would be living at home or near $100,000 in loans to go to Emory. Belmont obviously has virtually no alumni network and I don't want to stay in the Nashville area after graduation. I also would like to clerk post graduation because my ultimate goal is to be an AUSA.

3.8
158
URM

Retake isn't an option. Is Emory worth the debt? I'd appreciate the feedback with as little snark as possible.

User avatar
pleadthafif

Gold
Posts: 2068
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 11:37 am

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by pleadthafif » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:39 am

If you don't want to be in Nashville, why are you considering Belmont? Where would you like to be?

j0214f

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:26 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by j0214f » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:42 am

Nashville is where my family is and living at home cuts down on my COL. I would most likely like to stay in the South but I'm fairly open to other markets.

User avatar
pleadthafif

Gold
Posts: 2068
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 11:37 am

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by pleadthafif » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:46 am

Belmont wont get you much further than Nashville, so if you're wanting to practice somewhere other than Nashville it's not an option. Seems you have at least some interest in the Atlanta market given you applied to Emory, did you not also apply to UGA or GSU?

User avatar
lymenheimer

Gold
Posts: 3979
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:54 am

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by lymenheimer » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:48 am

j0214f wrote:Nashville is where my family is and living at home cuts down on my COL. I would most likely like to stay in the South but I'm fairly open to other markets.
Does Belmont place into those other markets in which you have interest? If not, then you should mark it off of your list.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


stretchedtoothin

Bronze
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:10 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by stretchedtoothin » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:48 am

j0214f wrote:I'm currently weighing a full scholarship and the opportunity to be a research assistant for Alberto Gonzales at Belmont Law in Nashville, which would result in no debt because I would be living at home or near $100,000 in loans to go to Emory. Belmont obviously has virtually no alumni network and I don't want to stay in the Nashville area after graduation. I also would like to clerk post graduation because my ultimate goal is to be an AUSA.

3.8
158
URM

Retake isn't an option. Is Emory worth the debt? I'd appreciate the feedback with as little snark as possible.
Only 3% of Emory's graduates clerked in 2015. 0.8% at Belmont. The odds of you getting a federal clerkship out by going to either school is very, very, very slim. You also don't want to stay in Nashville, and Belmont has virtually no reputation or a negative reputation everywhere outside of the Nashville area. I don't see how Belmont aligns with your goals at all.

Emory for $100,000 is pretty damn high, but not the worst mistake you could make. The worst mistake you could make would be not retaking for the 160 and trying again next year. What type of URM are you and where all did you apply?

j0214f

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:26 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by j0214f » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:51 am

pleadthafif wrote:Belmont wont get you much further than Nashville, so if you're wanting to practice somewhere other than Nashville it's not an option. Seems you have at least some interest in the Atlanta market given you applied to Emory, did you not also apply to UGA or GSU?
I only applied to Emory in the Atlanta market. I'm an undergrad alum

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:54 am

j0214f wrote:I'm currently weighing a full scholarship and the opportunity to be a research assistant for Alberto Gonzales at Belmont Law in Nashville, which would result in no debt because I would be living at home or near $100,000 in loans to go to Emory. Belmont obviously has virtually no alumni network and I don't want to stay in the Nashville area after graduation. I also would like to clerk post graduation because my ultimate goal is to be an AUSA.

3.8
158
URM

Retake isn't an option. Is Emory worth the debt? I'd appreciate the feedback with as little snark as possible.
You won't get a clerkship out of Belmont. Only 0.8% of their grads do. You also stand a very strong chance of being completely unemployed and unemployable with a Belmont degree. Here is a blog post about the complete scam that Belmont is:

http://outsidethelawschoolscam.blogspot ... phant.html

For a more academic take on Belmont, here's the LST Score Report on them:

http://www.lstscorereports.com/schools/ ... jobs/2014/

I would also highly recommend you not go to 6-figures into debt for Emory (which has been struggling a lot of late), especially with a URM status and a 3.8 GPA. Understand you say retake isn't an option. I don't believe you; it's always an option. There may be cause for a 1-year delay if you've used up all three attempts. In which case, get a job for a year or two, study, and retake. With a 160+ LSAT you'd probably get near full-ride at Emory or admission with $$ at Vandy. Make a 165+ and you'll have Duke/UVA open up with $$.

j0214f

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:26 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by j0214f » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:03 am

ponderingmeerkat wrote:
j0214f wrote:I'm currently weighing a full scholarship and the opportunity to be a research assistant for Alberto Gonzales at Belmont Law in Nashville, which would result in no debt because I would be living at home or near $100,000 in loans to go to Emory. Belmont obviously has virtually no alumni network and I don't want to stay in the Nashville area after graduation. I also would like to clerk post graduation because my ultimate goal is to be an AUSA.

3.8
158
URM

Retake isn't an option. Is Emory worth the debt? I'd appreciate the feedback with as little snark as possible.
You won't get a clerkship out of Belmont. Only 0.8% of their grads do. You also stand a very strong chance of being completely unemployed and unemployable with a Belmont degree. Here is a blog post about the complete scam that Belmont is:

http://outsidethelawschoolscam.blogspot ... phant.html

For a more academic take on Belmont, here's the LST Score Report on them:

http://www.lstscorereports.com/schools/ ... jobs/2014/

I would also highly recommend you not go to 6-figures into debt for Emory (which has been struggling a lot of late), especially with a URM status and a 3.8 GPA. Understand you say retake isn't an option. I don't believe you; it's always an option. There may be cause for a 1-year delay if you've used up all three attempts. In which case, get a job for a year or two, study, and retake. With a 160+ LSAT you'd probably get near full-ride at Emory or admission with $$ at Vandy. Make a 165+ and you'll have Duke/UVA open up with $$.
I've read just about every piece of information out there about both schools so I understand that Belmont is a risky step. I've already taken a year off and would really prefer to get my legal education started now so I'm not particularly interested in taking more time off to study to possibly not do any better on the LSAT. I fully realize this decision is the lesser of 2 evils but I'm asking if you had to choose, which would be the better option?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


grades??

Silver
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by grades?? » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:09 am

neither in any situation.

stretchedtoothin

Bronze
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:10 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by stretchedtoothin » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:11 am

j0214f wrote: I've read just about every piece of information out there about both schools so I understand that Belmont is a risky step. I've already taken a year off and would really prefer to get my legal education started now so I'm not particularly interested in taking more time off to study to possibly not do any better on the LSAT. I fully realize this decision is the lesser of 2 evils but I'm asking if you had to choose, which would be the better option?
All of your goals require extraordinarily hard work. The path of least resistance is a two-point increase on the LSAT, not the bet that you will be top 3% at Emory (you almost certainly won't be). Magna/summa cum laude from Emory + even being ~median from T14 for a URM is basically an auto-lock for most firm jobs/gov't positions.

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:16 am

j0214f wrote:
ponderingmeerkat wrote:
j0214f wrote:I'm currently weighing a full scholarship and the opportunity to be a research assistant for Alberto Gonzales at Belmont Law in Nashville, which would result in no debt because I would be living at home or near $100,000 in loans to go to Emory. Belmont obviously has virtually no alumni network and I don't want to stay in the Nashville area after graduation. I also would like to clerk post graduation because my ultimate goal is to be an AUSA.

3.8
158
URM

Retake isn't an option. Is Emory worth the debt? I'd appreciate the feedback with as little snark as possible.
You won't get a clerkship out of Belmont. Only 0.8% of their grads do. You also stand a very strong chance of being completely unemployed and unemployable with a Belmont degree. Here is a blog post about the complete scam that Belmont is:

http://outsidethelawschoolscam.blogspot ... phant.html

For a more academic take on Belmont, here's the LST Score Report on them:

http://www.lstscorereports.com/schools/ ... jobs/2014/

I would also highly recommend you not go to 6-figures into debt for Emory (which has been struggling a lot of late), especially with a URM status and a 3.8 GPA. Understand you say retake isn't an option. I don't believe you; it's always an option. There may be cause for a 1-year delay if you've used up all three attempts. In which case, get a job for a year or two, study, and retake. With a 160+ LSAT you'd probably get near full-ride at Emory or admission with $$ at Vandy. Make a 165+ and you'll have Duke/UVA open up with $$.
I've read just about every piece of information out there about both schools so I understand that Belmont is a risky step. I've already taken a year off and would really prefer to get my legal education started now so I'm not particularly interested in taking more time off to study to possibly not do any better on the LSAT. I fully realize this decision is the lesser of 2 evils but I'm asking if you had to choose, which would be the better option?
How old are you? 25? 28? I'm 32 and applying next cycle. I promise, you're not too old to wait a year and get your shit in a sock. Don't sell yourself or your skills short. You have every ability to score 160+ and maybe even 165+. The idea of you and your future family being subjected to the terrible outcome you'll guarantee for yourself at Belmont isn't something I can even possibly recommend. Emory at $100K is an only slightly better bad outcome.

Please please, I'm begging you...think outside the box on this, take breath, realize you're a badass and deserve badass outcomes for yourself and your future family. You are not deserving of these options. Don't do this to yourself.

User avatar
WinterComing

Silver
Posts: 729
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:10 am

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by WinterComing » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:25 am

Retake.

Unless you explain why it's not an option, it's your best option, even if you don't want to do it.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


j0214f

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:26 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by j0214f » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:29 am

You've all definitely given me something to think about. Thanks.

Ehsmith1

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 10:18 am

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by Ehsmith1 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:58 pm

Belmont just received full accreditation from the ABA. See http://www.belmont.edu/law/admission/accreditation.html

As far as employment, if you look at the large Nashville area firms, Belmont seems competitive. Since 2014 (its first graduating class), Waller has taken 4 Belmont graduates and 1 from Vanderbilt. Bass Berry Sims has taken 1 from Belmont and 2 from Vanderbilt. I did a quick google search and found several judicial clerks in the Nashville area who are Belmont College of Law grads.

If you can go for free, you should consider it.

http://www.belmont.edu/law/pdf/Class201 ... atsABA.pdf

User avatar
pancakes3

Platinum
Posts: 6619
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by pancakes3 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:06 pm

don't be an ass. 1) raw numbers don't count for jack squat. 2) there's a difference between clerking and fed clerking.

User avatar
Nachoo2019

Silver
Posts: 798
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 2:04 pm

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by Nachoo2019 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:08 pm

6-8 more points on a test and you could be clerking as a Harvard law grad.... Your amazing GPA and URM status gives you unlimited potential. Why waste it?

wlee1220

Bronze
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:45 am

Re: Emory v Belmont Law

Post by wlee1220 » Thu Jun 09, 2016 10:41 pm

Man don't waste your GPA on these options. If I was able to put in the work and retake for a higher score, I know you can as well. I went from an almost abysmal outcome to Penn at a steal because I was patient. Don't make a hasty decision you'll regret later.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”