. Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
lawschool1856

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:40 pm

.

Post by lawschool1856 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:02 pm

.
Last edited by lawschool1856 on Mon Apr 25, 2016 5:05 pm, edited 6 times in total.

lavarman84

Platinum
Posts: 8535
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: Emory v. GW v. UF

Post by lavarman84 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 7:52 pm

How strong are your ties in Florida? Is a retake not an option? Your goals are somewhat specific but also a bit vague. Can you provide anything more specific? Are you leaning more towards a firm job or more towards working as an ASA? Do you want to clerk? What sort of firm job would you want?(biglaw?)

lawschool1856

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:40 pm

.

Post by lawschool1856 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:18 pm

.
Last edited by lawschool1856 on Sat Jul 30, 2016 12:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.

lavarman84

Platinum
Posts: 8535
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: Emory v. GW v. UF

Post by lavarman84 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:07 pm

The argument for retaking would be to push it up quite a bit higher and get a full ride to one of these schools or into a t14 school. Although, you did say that finances aren't a concern. Out of these options, I'd say UF is the best option considering your goals. Clerking and biglaw will be tough at UF but if you want to be a prosecutor in Florida, it's going to offer you better networking opportunities for that goal. There are others better qualified to give you advice on the AUSA goal. From what I know, clerkships are generally valuable for that. That'll be tough at UF. Which is where retaking and trying to get into a t14 school would help.

lawschool1856

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:40 pm

.

Post by lawschool1856 » Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:56 am

.
Last edited by lawschool1856 on Sat Jul 30, 2016 12:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
lymenheimer

Gold
Posts: 3979
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:54 am

Re: Emory v. GW v. UF

Post by lymenheimer » Mon Apr 18, 2016 12:02 pm

lawschool1856 wrote: I suppose a retake is always an option, although at this point that would mean waiting another year before starting law school. I'm not really sure I see the value. With my GPA, 2-3 more points on the LSAT maybe moves me from Vandy waitlist to Vandy admit but that's about it. I don't think it gets me off Gtown waitlist, or into UVA, Duke, etc. At this point I don't see a retake being worth it. I'd be interested to hear the argument for a retake in my situation, though.
I have a similar gpa and a 4 point higher lsat. Accepted to GULC, Duke, and UVA. Vandy with good money...fwiw

User avatar
Specter1389

Bronze
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 3:07 pm

Re: Emory v. GW v. UF

Post by Specter1389 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:19 am

I have a lower GPA (only a 3.0) and 5 points higher on the LSAT. I received close to a full ride to UF, GULC with money, and an acceptance to UVA. Also, the first time I took the LSAT I scored a 166. If you can raise your LSAT to a 169-170 I see no reason why you wouldn't get somewhere in the T-14/better offers to the schools you are considering. The below link shows your options go up significantly if you can score in the 168-170 range.

http://mylsn.info/amrpv3/

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”