Discrepancy on LST- what's up? Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
Toodle-loo

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:48 pm

Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Toodle-loo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:22 am

According to Law School Transparency (http://www.lstscorereports.com/national/), the full cost of attendance for a non-resident at UMich is nearly 20k less than a Duke Student. However, non-resident tuition at UMich is almost exactly the same as Duke tuition and it has been since at least 2013 (according to ABA docs). It seems like A2 and Durham have similar Costs of Living, so....

Any idea about what causes the difference in LST's published stats?

Lawcat11

Bronze
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:38 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Lawcat11 » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:34 am

I think and I could be wrong, but maybe it's because after a year at Mich you qualify for in-state tuition?

User avatar
Toodle-loo

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:48 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Toodle-loo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:41 am

Applesauce11 wrote:I think and I could be wrong, but maybe it's because after a year at Mich you qualify for in-state tuition?
That's certainly not the idea I've gotten reading through their website's resources on residency, and it would only account for appx 6-10k difference over 2 years. It would be awesome if in-state residency was a possibility after a year though, whether that solves this particular mystery or not.

User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Clearly » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:44 am

I'll shoot a PM to the guy who brought us the gift that is LST.

User avatar
Toodle-loo

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:48 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Toodle-loo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:45 am

Clearly wrote:I'll shoot a PM to the guy who brought us the gift that is LST.
Straight to the source! That seems efficient. Thanks!

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by jenesaislaw » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:47 am

*waves*

Talk about service!

Will look into this now.

User avatar
Toodle-loo

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:48 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Toodle-loo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:54 am

jenesaislaw wrote:*waves*

Talk about service!

Will look into this now.
Oh hey! Thanks! :mrgreen:

User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by jenesaislaw » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:55 am

Toodle-loo wrote:According to Law School Transparency (http://www.lstscorereports.com/national/), the full cost of attendance for a non-resident at UMich is nearly 20k less than a Duke Student. However, non-resident tuition at UMich is almost exactly the same as Duke tuition and it has been since at least 2013 (according to ABA docs). It seems like A2 and Durham have similar Costs of Living, so....

Any idea about what causes the difference in LST's published stats?
UMich non-resident is $56,112 this year. At Duke it's $57,717.

The COL is where the differences are starker. $18,550 at Michigan and $21,834 at Duke.

So in sum that's a difference of $4889 this year. However, the estimate measures students starting next year, so we have to account for tuition increases and COL increases. We assume a 2% increase for COL across the board. This means the COL will go up more at Duke than Michigan because of a higher starting point. The differences in tuition increases are less severe (.5% difference) but larger numbers to start with (tuition is out of control). Duke also starts higher so the percentage increase is more severe.

Add to this three years of increases plus interest accumulated on the differences and you see how there's about a 30k difference in how much you owe at each school.

In other words, no problem here! Phew.

ETA: making some changes to the text here -- it's late.

User avatar
Toodle-loo

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:48 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Toodle-loo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 am

jenesaislaw wrote:
UMich non-resident is $56,112 this year. At Duke it's $57,717.

The COL is where the differences are starker. $18,550 at Michigan and $21,834 at Duke.

So in sum that's a difference of $4889 this year. However, the estimate measures students starting next year, so we have to account for tuition increases and COL increases. We assume a 2% increase for COL across the board. This means the COL will go up more at Duke than Michigan because of a higher starting point. The differences in tuition increases are less severe (.5% difference) but larger numbers to start with (tuition is out of control). Duke also starts higher so the percentage increase is more severe.

Add to this three years of increases plus interest accumulated on the differences and you see how there's about a 30k difference in how much you owe at each school.

In other words, no problem here! Phew.

ETA: making some changes to the text here -- it's late.
So in the calculation of cost, you've included the fact that Duke has far more in required fees (which I noticed), and that accounts for a bit of it. For CoL, does LST calculate those independently or use the ones that are provided by each school's website?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Toodle-loo

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:48 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Toodle-loo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:03 am

jenesaislaw wrote:
ETA: making some changes to the text here -- it's late.
Also, please don't feel like these questions have to be answered immediately - I'm aware that my night owl tendencies are not normal or healthy :D

User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by jenesaislaw » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:09 am

I'm up and thinking about it, no worries.

We get the COL starting point from the schools, and apply a 2% COL adjustment each year. The starting point is what the schools reported on the 509s for 2015-16 (thus it gets an adjustment for 2016-17, 17-18, and 18-19).

There's also a 4.2x% origination fee that expands the difference.

I just ran the differences through a spreadsheet for you. This is pre-interest and pre-origination fees.

For a student starting at Duke in 2016 and using the increase assumptions laid out on the school's profile on LST, total COA is $255,095. At Michigan it is $237,775.

In other words, $17,320 turns into about $30k if you borrow due to origination fees and interest.

User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by jenesaislaw » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:12 am

PS I really encourage you to fill out financial worksheets on LST. Create an account and give it a shot. It outlines everything for you rather clearly. (Or so I hope...I'm the responsible party. Feedback welcome!)

User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Clearly » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:13 am

This is entirely unsolicted by LST. But I hope lots of TLSers use this link:
http://www.lawschooltransparency.com/ho ... lp/#donate
This service is so critical and so often cited here, I do hope we're collectively helping support it.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by jenesaislaw » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:15 am

:oops:

Thanks for that. We really do need the money. How's that for transparency?

User avatar
Toodle-loo

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:48 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Toodle-loo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:20 am

jenesaislaw wrote:I'm up and thinking about it, no worries.

We get the COL starting point from the schools
ooookkk I think I see now - So it was mildly interesting to me that the CoL was so much higher per year in Durham than A2, as I've looked up basic costs in each and they seem comparable. If either is "more" expensive, I'd say it's been A2. The key (I think) is that the UMich CoL estimate is based on 8months, and most other schools (including Duke, if I'm not mistaken), use a 9 month estimate.

Thank you so much for your help and resources, and I'll definitely be using some of those worksheets. It was just a curiosity bugging me and I wondered. I really appreciate your responses!

User avatar
Toodle-loo

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:48 pm

Re: Discrepancy on LST- what's up?

Post by Toodle-loo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:21 am

Clearly wrote:This is entirely unsolicted by LST. But I hope lots of TLSers use this link:
http://www.lawschooltransparency.com/ho ... lp/#donate
This service is so critical and so often cited here, I do hope we're collectively helping support it.
I have a running list of places to donate to after I round off my savings. 7Sage is at the top of this list, and I have no problem adding LST as well :D

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”