. Forum
-
plzhelpmechoose

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:42 pm
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Michigan vs UCLA
Its at least $30k more valuable
But both are too expensive
But both are too expensive
-
plzhelpmechoose

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:42 pm
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Michigan vs UCLA
Well, I think Michigan is clear between these two. Unless the market for UCLA candidates has improved significantly over the past three years.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
03152016

- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: Michigan vs UCLA
yea but answer the questions in the sticky anyways
if they didn't help us give you the best advice they wouldn't be there
if they didn't help us give you the best advice they wouldn't be there
-
plzhelpmechoose

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:42 pm
-
03152016

- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: Michigan vs UCLA
how do you expect us to answer any of this
you didn't say whether you'd take out loans or how much you had saved (or any other means of financing law school)
so we have no idea how risky this is financially or if you've correctly calculated coa
and you didn't post numbers so we can't tell you if you're getting a good deal or if/how much leverage you have for negotiation
everything anyone posts will be guesswork because you can't follow directions
you didn't say whether you'd take out loans or how much you had saved (or any other means of financing law school)
so we have no idea how risky this is financially or if you've correctly calculated coa
and you didn't post numbers so we can't tell you if you're getting a good deal or if/how much leverage you have for negotiation
everything anyone posts will be guesswork because you can't follow directions
-
plzhelpmechoose

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:42 pm
- RareExports

- Posts: 719
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:12 pm
Re: Michigan vs UCLA
Any "longtime reader" would know neither of these options are defensible in most situations. If you have a special circumstance (family money, GI Bill, guaranteed job offer, etc.), let us know, otherwise, I think you know neither of these choices are good. If forced to choose, Michigan, but it's risky. Certainly you have lower COA options--WUSTL, Emory, USC?
ETA: You got 20k from Mich with a 163? I don't care if you have to sit out an entire 12 months for it, you need to retake or not go at all. I know it seems like a lot now, but a few points higher and you're looking at savings of tens of thousands of dollars.
ETA: You got 20k from Mich with a 163? I don't care if you have to sit out an entire 12 months for it, you need to retake or not go at all. I know it seems like a lot now, but a few points higher and you're looking at savings of tens of thousands of dollars.
-
plzhelpmechoose

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:42 pm
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Michigan vs UCLA
Michigan is worth more, but I would definitely not pay >100k for their shaky biglaw placement
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: Michigan vs UCLA
163/3.8 gets $60k at Mich? Nice work, looks like you over performed your numbers a good bit. Michigan is the better option, but I wouldn't take out that much to go to Michigan.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login