162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh! Forum
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:35 pm
162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
Got my LSAT back, was my last try so no retakes. Texas resident here, I've already been accepted to a local school with good big law prospects and with my 162, I'll be eligible for max scholarship and combined with 60 hours in vet benefits, I'd be going to school for free with livig expenses covered. I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily. But if I wait another cycle I would have a decent chance at UT (I personally know other MA with similar numbers who got in). I'd also have those 60 hours of vet benefits but scholarship would probably be skimp.
2 options: 1)Go to UH this fall with decent big law prospects and 0 debt. 2)wait a cycle for a chance at UT and get into around 40-50k worth of debt.
All opinions appreciated.
2 options: 1)Go to UH this fall with decent big law prospects and 0 debt. 2)wait a cycle for a chance at UT and get into around 40-50k worth of debt.
All opinions appreciated.
Last edited by robertrulez on Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BVest
- Posts: 7887
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
If you're talking UH I'd probably go with that. But don't expect to necessarily be big fish.robertrulez wrote:Got my LSAT back, was my last try so no retakes. Texas resident here, I've already been accepted to a local school with good big law prospects and with my 162, I'll be eligible for max scholarship and combined with 60 hours in vet benefits, I'd be going to school for free with livig expenses covered. I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily. But if I wait another cycle I would have a decent chance at UT (I personally know other MA with similar numbers who got in). I'd also have those 60 hours of vet benefits but scholarship would probably be skimp.
2 options: 1)Go to local school this fall with decent big law prospects and 0 debt. 2)wait a cycle for a chance at UT and get into around 40-50k worth of debt.
All opinions appreciated.
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
- stego
- Posts: 5301
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:23 am
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
I understand this and I know correlation=/=causation, but statistically, I will probably end up at the top of my class. I know this for a variety of reasons/factors but mainly because I'd be living at home so mom will be taking care of me while I study all day and night.stasg wrote:This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:55 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
You literally sound retarded. You need to sit out a year because you are immaturerobertrulez wrote:I understand this and I know correlation=/=causation, but statistically, I will probably end up at the top of my class. I know this for a variety of reasons/factors but mainly because I'd be living at home so mom will be taking care of me while I study all day and night.stasg wrote:This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
You're a great help, bud.hartfordhockaloogies wrote:You literally sound retarded. You need to sit out a year because you are immaturerobertrulez wrote:I understand this and I know correlation=/=causation, but statistically, I will probably end up at the top of my class. I know this for a variety of reasons/factors but mainly because I'd be living at home so mom will be taking care of me while I study all day and night.stasg wrote:This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
Man I hope for your sake that this is a flame.robertrulez wrote:You're a great help, bud.hartfordhockaloogies wrote:You literally sound retarded. You need to sit out a year because you are immaturerobertrulez wrote:I understand this and I know correlation=/=causation, but statistically, I will probably end up at the top of my class. I know this for a variety of reasons/factors but mainly because I'd be living at home so mom will be taking care of me while I study all day and night.stasg wrote:This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:51 am
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
I wouldn't have said it like he did but he's right, that comment reeks of immaturity. I don't even understand what it means, are you trying to say that you'll DEFINITELY finish in the top 10% of your class because your mom will do your laundry and cook for you?robertrulez wrote:You're a great help, bud.hartfordhockaloogies wrote:You literally sound retarded. You need to sit out a year because you are immaturerobertrulez wrote:I understand this and I know correlation=/=causation, but statistically, I will probably end up at the top of my class. I know this for a variety of reasons/factors but mainly because I'd be living at home so mom will be taking care of me while I study all day and night.stasg wrote:This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
hartfordhockaloogies wrote:You literally sound retarded. You need to sit out a year because you are immaturerobertrulez wrote:I understand this and I know correlation=/=causation, but statistically, I will probably end up at the top of my class. I know this for a variety of reasons/factors but mainly because I'd be living at home so mom will be taking care of me while I study all day and night.stasg wrote:This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
LOL. This guy's furious.

UH for sure. Work as hard as you can for the best grades possible. Lower T14 or UT would be debt traps that'll drain you of your sanity even with small scholarships because you'll end up needing to work a grueling biglaw job for free for a few years.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
That's really not how it works.robertrulez wrote:I understand this and I know correlation=/=causation, but statistically, I will probably end up at the top of my class. I know this for a variety of reasons/factors but mainly because I'd be living at home so mom will be taking care of me while I study all day and night.stasg wrote:This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
- PrezRand
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
Wait it out. UH will offer you the same next year. If you can get a 170, that can improve your prospects for a better school and scholarships
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
I guess I should have clarified. I used the word "probably", because I know that if I can just focus on school, I think I can make it to the top of the class easily. Though I do understand it's no guarantee. I'd like big law in Houston but it isn't even the ends all goal which is why UH sounds quite appetizing. My parents own an accounting/tax business that caters to the Latino community and I could take over, grow it, and then do a mix of immigration law and tax law, plus accounting work.Stillblade wrote:I wouldn't have said it like he did but he's right, that comment reeks of immaturity. I don't even understand what it means, are you trying to say that you'll DEFINITELY finish in the top 10% of your class because your mom will do your laundry and cook for you?robertrulez wrote:You're a great help, bud.hartfordhockaloogies wrote:You literally sound retarded. You need to sit out a year because you are immaturerobertrulez wrote:I understand this and I know correlation=/=causation, but statistically, I will probably end up at the top of my class. I know this for a variety of reasons/factors but mainly because I'd be living at home so mom will be taking care of me while I study all day and night.stasg wrote:This is not a certainty. At most schools, grades in a class are based on one exam on a forced curve. Some people who did awesome in undergrad do poorly in law school and vice versa. It's better to assume going in that you'll have median grades.robertrulez wrote:I like the idea of being a big fish in a pool of small fish, I'm sure I'll be able to get into the top 10 easily.
-
- Posts: 614
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:19 pm
Re: 162 3.6 urm MA -- Help meh!
Your verbiage is insufferable. Throwing around words like "easily" makes it feasible to go to Tech or A&M, if it is a purported slam dunk to obtain highest rank. But, we all know that is suicide.
Seriously, a difference of 4 or 5 points is explainable by several insignificant variables. Knock down the expectations a few pegs. There will be plenty of gunners at UH.
Seriously, a difference of 4 or 5 points is explainable by several insignificant variables. Knock down the expectations a few pegs. There will be plenty of gunners at UH.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login