USC ($$) v Mich ($) Forum
-
averagewhiteguy

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:33 pm
USC ($$) v Mich ($)
.
Last edited by averagewhiteguy on Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
- LegaleZy

- Posts: 92
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
I would go USC given your preference to stay in CA. I'm sure getting back to CA is possible from Michigan with ties, but I don't see the point of paying an extra 35k for Michigan when 1) USC is cheaper and 2) you want to stay in CA.
-
A.Taarabt7

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:45 pm
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
Michigan bodes well for your career goals a lot more than U$C. Just go to Michigan, it's a T14. Plenty of Michigan grads in California biglaw.
- stego

- Posts: 5301
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:23 am
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
I don't know how easy it is to get California biglaw. OP, I think an important question is, if California biglaw doesn't happen, how do you feel about biglaw in some other market (like NYC) versus working for a smaller firm in California.
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
This is a good question. I honestly think it's too much for USC. That's still a little more than I would pay for Michigan, but I think it's more defensible.stasg wrote:I don't know how easy it is to get California biglaw. OP, I think an important question is, if California biglaw doesn't happen, how do you feel about biglaw in some other market (like NYC) versus working for a smaller firm in California.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ndirish2010

- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
His parents are paying - so Michigan. The correct answer is retake if you can get a waiver and can get any higher.
- KMart

- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
OP, your answer to this question should answer your question about which school you want.stasg wrote:if California biglaw doesn't happen, how do you feel about biglaw in some other market (like NYC) versus working for a smaller firm in California.
-
averagewhiteguy

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:33 pm
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
.
Last edited by averagewhiteguy on Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
I wouldn't go to any school expecting to land ~midlaw~
-
CanadianWolf

- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: USC ($$) v Mich ($)
Michigan since your COA will be funded by your parents (presumably interest free) & $35,000 is reasonable for a T-14 law school versus USC.