T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW Forum
-
hbartlett

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 11:44 pm
T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
...
Last edited by hbartlett on Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Mullens

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
It is generally a poor choice to go to any school for full price or close to it. Keep retaking the LSAT until you score 170+ and can attend a T14 at a significant discount.hbartlett wrote:After looking through this forum, it seems that many posters have a "T-14 or bust" mentality, which I can definitely understand given the unparalleled employment statistics that these schools offer (according to Law School Transparency.) At the same time, however, it looks like other schools in major metropolitan areas and with recognizable names (Boston College, Boston University, George Washington, Notre Dame, Emory) have at least solid job placement stats, but their median GPA and LSATs are much lower. I took the June 2015 LSAT (my first LSAT) and haven't received my score yet, but I'm fairly sure it will be between 160 and 165. My GPA is 3.67. I'm a caucasian female. My question is, would it be a poor choice to go to one of these schools at full price or close to it? Thank you in advance for your help.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
extremely poor choice
-
Big Dog

- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
There are no worse choices that you could make.My question is, would it be a poor choice to go to one of these schools at full price or close to it? Thank you in advance for your help.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Does it sound like a good idea to take on more than $200k in debt for a ~30% chance at landing a job that pays enough for you to pay that all back?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ndirish2010

- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Come back when you have a score. But don't go to ND/BC/GW at sticker, or anywhere close to it.
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Unless you want to work non biglaw jobs in those regions, I wouldn't go to any even for free
-
CanadianWolf

- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Do not pay full price or anywhere close to sticker price for Emory, GWU, BU, BC or Notre Dame because the debt burden far outweighs the likelihood of getting a job with sufficient income to pay back the loans.
An LSAT score in the 170s will certainly generate several T-14 acceptances, some with substantial scholarship offers, as well as many full tuition scholarship offers from non-Top 14 law schools. The minimum LSAT score needed for strong options is probably a 168 in your case. Also, there is no penalty nor harm in retaking the LSAT.
An LSAT score in the 170s will certainly generate several T-14 acceptances, some with substantial scholarship offers, as well as many full tuition scholarship offers from non-Top 14 law schools. The minimum LSAT score needed for strong options is probably a 168 in your case. Also, there is no penalty nor harm in retaking the LSAT.
- Clemenceau

- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Agreed. And just to build on this, schools like cornell and georgetown were readily taking 3.6/167-8 applicants this cycle. Frankly that's a pretty low bar for such good law schools(buyer's market if you will). There's no excuse to keep your 163 or whatever when these schools are within a retake's reach.CanadianWolf wrote:Do not pay full price or anywhere close to sticker price for Emory, GWU, BU, BC or Notre Dame because the debt burden far outweighs the likelihood of getting a job with sufficient income to pay back the loans.
An LSAT score in the 170s will certainly generate several T-14 acceptances, some with substantial scholarship offers, as well as many full tuition scholarship offers from non-Top 14 law schools. The minimum LSAT score needed for strong options is probably a 168 in your case. Also, there is no penalty nor harm in retaking the LSAT.
- ndirish2010

- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
I wouldn't go to GULC or Cornell sticker either though.
- Clemenceau

- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Well yeah me neither, but op is talking about going to emory or gw at sticker. Baby steps.ndirish2010 wrote:I wouldn't go to GULC or Cornell sticker either though.
- ndirish2010

- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Ha, good point. I went to ND on a half ride and that seemed like a great deal at the time, but I tell 0Ls not to do the same thing all the time.Clemenceau wrote:Well yeah me neither, but op is talking about going to emory or gw at sticker. Baby steps.ndirish2010 wrote:I wouldn't go to GULC or Cornell sticker either though.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
I went to WUSTL with even less and got biglaw and would never tell anyone to do the same either.ndirish2010 wrote:Ha, good point. I went to ND on a half ride and that seemed like a great deal at the time, but I tell 0Ls not to do the same thing all the time.Clemenceau wrote:Well yeah me neither, but op is talking about going to emory or gw at sticker. Baby steps.ndirish2010 wrote:I wouldn't go to GULC or Cornell sticker either though.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
WeeBey

- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
I wouldn't even go to HYS at sticker UNLESS I'm solely interested in something that's covered by the LRAP. Fuck I look like paying $300k for biglaw?ndirish2010 wrote:I wouldn't go to GULC or Cornell sticker either though.
- ndirish2010

- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Had a good outcome too. It sometimes confuses people when I argue against it.scottidsntknow wrote:I went to WUSTL with even less and got biglaw and would never tell anyone to do the same either.ndirish2010 wrote:Ha, good point. I went to ND on a half ride and that seemed like a great deal at the time, but I tell 0Ls not to do the same thing all the time.Clemenceau wrote:Well yeah me neither, but op is talking about going to emory or gw at sticker. Baby steps.ndirish2010 wrote:I wouldn't go to GULC or Cornell sticker either though.
- Wild Card

- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
I've read that GW and BU offer full-tuition scholarships to successful early decision applicants. Those might be reasonable choices if you insist on trying your luck with a 3.67/165.
- Mack.Hambleton

- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Retake, a 3.67 doesn't preclude you from big money at T14
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: T-14 vs. ND, BC, GW
Yup. A 170 will get you half off many T14s.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Retake, a 3.67 doesn't preclude you from big money at T14
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login