Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$) Forum
- LeeAllen

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:22 pm
Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
The schools you are considering:
Michigan, Cornell, and Texas.
-The total Cost of Attendance (COA) of each.:
Michigan: $117,000 (90k scholly)
Cornell: $105,000 (135k scholly)
Texas: $103,000 (107k scholly)
-How you will be financing your COA:
Loans.
-Where you are from and where you want to work, and other places where you have significant ties (if any) :
I am from Michigan and I have a lot of connections in state government. I spent close to a year in DC, and I'd like to end up there.
-Your general career goals
I'd like to clerk and ideally do appellate work.
-Your LSAT/GPA numbers
169/3.80
-How many times you have taken the LSAT
Twice.
Any advice? I'm hoping to negotiate up Michigan's offer.
Michigan, Cornell, and Texas.
-The total Cost of Attendance (COA) of each.:
Michigan: $117,000 (90k scholly)
Cornell: $105,000 (135k scholly)
Texas: $103,000 (107k scholly)
-How you will be financing your COA:
Loans.
-Where you are from and where you want to work, and other places where you have significant ties (if any) :
I am from Michigan and I have a lot of connections in state government. I spent close to a year in DC, and I'd like to end up there.
-Your general career goals
I'd like to clerk and ideally do appellate work.
-Your LSAT/GPA numbers
169/3.80
-How many times you have taken the LSAT
Twice.
Any advice? I'm hoping to negotiate up Michigan's offer.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
Uh-oh.LeeAllen wrote: I'd like to clerk and ideally do appellate work.
- KMart

- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
Cornell based on these numbers. UT shouldn't even be in the conversation if you want DC.
- OhBoyOhBortles

- Posts: 2473
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:01 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
rpupkin wrote:Uh-oh.LeeAllen wrote: I'd like to clerk and ideally do appellate work.
-
Hand

- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
well if you're #1 in your class then no problem but since the #1 spot at cornell is already taken, I'd go with michOhBoyOhBortles wrote:rpupkin wrote:Uh-oh.LeeAllen wrote: I'd like to clerk and ideally do appellate work.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kinky John

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:52 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
LolHand wrote:well if you're #1 in your class then no problem but since the #1 spot at cornell is already taken I'd go with michOhBoyOhBortles wrote:rpupkin wrote:Uh-oh.LeeAllen wrote: I'd like to clerk and ideally do appellate work.
Also OP your CoA estimates are too low
- LeeAllen

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:22 pm
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
I used the COA estimates provided by the schools. Cornell is 80k a year, MI in-state is roughly 70k. Do you have reason to believe that the numbers provided by the school are inaccurate?swadianfc wrote:
Also OP your CoA estimates are too low
What about Cornell puts it above Michigan for DC? Yeah, UT likely isn't the place to go if I'm aiming for DC.KMart wrote:Cornell based on these numbers. UT shouldn't even be in the conversation if you want DC.
- AreJay711

- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
Go to either Cornell or Michigan if you want NYC, whichever you like better. Go to Michigan if you don't want to be in NYC.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
Cost of attendance includes interest, loan origination fees, etc. It's not "Round off the school provided cost of attendance, subtract scholarship= done." You need to do a proper calculation, if only for yourself.LeeAllen wrote:I used the COA estimates provided by the schools. Cornell is 80k a year, MI in-state is roughly 70k. Do you have reason to believe that the numbers provided by the school are inaccurate?swadianfc wrote:
Also OP your CoA estimates are too low
Texas is out, doesn't make any sense here
Your career goals are too hard for mere mortals to achieve, what's the realistic plan? Right now the only realistic advice we can give is retake, go to Harvard. If you have realistic goals and geographic preferences then people can give better advice.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
It's appropriate, AreJay711, that your tar is Spock, because this post reminds me of the Star Trek episode where Spock (or was it Kirk?) blew up an evil computer by making a completely illogical statement.AreJay711 wrote:Go to either Cornell or Michigan if you want NYC, whichever you like better. Go to Michigan if you don't want to be in NYC.
- LeeAllen

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:22 pm
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
That's a fair point. Should I expect much disparity in these fees or would it just be more closely resembling a flat boost to the COA of any school I attend?BigZuck wrote:Cost of attendance includes interest, loan origination fees, etc. It's not "Round off the school provided cost of attendance, subtract scholarship= done." You need to do a proper calculation, if only for yourself.LeeAllen wrote:I used the COA estimates provided by the schools. Cornell is 80k a year, MI in-state is roughly 70k. Do you have reason to believe that the numbers provided by the school are inaccurate?swadianfc wrote:
Also OP your CoA estimates are too low
Haha, yes, you're right. I realize I'm being quite optimistic. Realistically, I'll work at a big firm to pay off the debt and then from there on out I'd be interested in government work (state or federal level) or perhaps moving to a smaller firm.BigZuck wrote:Your career goals are too hard for mere mortals to achieve, what's the realistic plan? Right now the only realistic advice we can give is retake, go to Harvard. If you have realistic goals and geographic preferences then people can give better advice.
-
Nomo

- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:06 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
And don't forget to include tuition increases. LST has data on historical tuition increases. But they're generally anywhere from $1,500 to $3,000 a year at the schools you're looking at.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
There might be better ones but using this type of calculator is what I'm thinking of: https://www.bu.edu/law/prospective/fina ... alculator/
I vote Cornell and also a June retake just for funnies/see if you bink like a 174 or something and can squeeze more money out of the bloodsuckers or reapply and aim higher if you feel so inclined
I vote Cornell and also a June retake just for funnies/see if you bink like a 174 or something and can squeeze more money out of the bloodsuckers or reapply and aim higher if you feel so inclined
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LeeAllen

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:22 pm
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
I should have mentioned - I'm planning on the retake in June. If I get a substantially higher score, I'll consider sitting out a cycle.BigZuck wrote:There might be better ones but using this type of calculator is what I'm thinking of: https://www.bu.edu/law/prospective/fina ... alculator/
I vote Cornell and also a June retake just for funnies/see if you bink like a 174 or something and can squeeze more money out of the bloodsuckers or reapply and aim higher if you feel so inclined
-
Wingtip88

- Posts: 247
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:00 pm
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
Use the financial worksheets over on Law School Transparency for the full and accurate picture of your prospective debt loads.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
NOICELeeAllen wrote:I should have mentioned - I'm planning on the retake in June. If I get a substantially higher score, I'll consider sitting out a cycle.BigZuck wrote:There might be better ones but using this type of calculator is what I'm thinking of: https://www.bu.edu/law/prospective/fina ... alculator/
I vote Cornell and also a June retake just for funnies/see if you bink like a 174 or something and can squeeze more money out of the bloodsuckers or reapply and aim higher if you feel so inclined
Good luck
- AreJay711

- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
Sentence 1: If NYC then M or C.rpupkin wrote:It's appropriate, AreJay711, that your tar is Spock, because this post reminds me of the Star Trek episode where Spock (or was it Kirk?) blew up an evil computer by making a completely illogical statement.AreJay711 wrote:Go to either Cornell or Michigan if you want NYC, whichever you like better. Go to Michigan if you don't want to be in NYC.
Sentence 2: If ~NYC then M and ~C
Or do you just have a better reed on the entry-level legal job market than I do?
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Michigan ($$$) v. Cornell ($$$$) v. Texas ($$$)
Mich if you don't want NYC. Cornell if you do want NYC. Retake/sit out for HYSCCN if you would only be happy doing fancy appellate stuff.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login