Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC Forum
-
AlohaFriday

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:09 pm
Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
As deadlines approach, I am trying to decide where I should deposit. I have been accepted at Michigan, UCLA, USC, and Georgetown. I am awaiting decisions from Stanford, Columbia, and NYU. Wait listed at Harvard, Penn, and Duke. Rejected at Yale and Boalt. I did not apply to any other schools.
Scholarships/COA:
Michigan: $75,000 total; $142,284 COA
UCLA: $105,500 total; $118,484.98 COA (Will gain CA residency after 1L)
USC: $159,000 total, $92,469 COA
Georgetown: Yet to receive offer
I will be financing my education through loans.
I am from Hawaii, but I am currently an undergraduate in CA. I'd like to work in CA if possible. Not opposed to other markets, but CA is a preference. I would say my ties in the area are average.
I am hopeful for biglaw. Not entirely set on biglaw but definitely private practice. No interest in PI.
LSAT: 168; GPA: 3.9 (URM)
Took LSAT once after 6 months of classes. Was PTing in a wide range of 163-169 range about 1.5 months out. First LSAT was 157 or 159, can't remember.
I'd appreciate any input!
Scholarships/COA:
Michigan: $75,000 total; $142,284 COA
UCLA: $105,500 total; $118,484.98 COA (Will gain CA residency after 1L)
USC: $159,000 total, $92,469 COA
Georgetown: Yet to receive offer
I will be financing my education through loans.
I am from Hawaii, but I am currently an undergraduate in CA. I'd like to work in CA if possible. Not opposed to other markets, but CA is a preference. I would say my ties in the area are average.
I am hopeful for biglaw. Not entirely set on biglaw but definitely private practice. No interest in PI.
LSAT: 168; GPA: 3.9 (URM)
Took LSAT once after 6 months of classes. Was PTing in a wide range of 163-169 range about 1.5 months out. First LSAT was 157 or 159, can't remember.
I'd appreciate any input!
Last edited by AlohaFriday on Wed Apr 15, 2015 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KMart

- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Your GPA will be loved by Boalt. Retake, get Boalt/Stanford, enjoy CA.
- ILoveYou

- Posts: 519
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 3:42 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
KMart wrote:Your GPA will be loved by Boalt. Retake, get Boalt/Stanford, enjoy CA.
With your goals, as a URM, I think this is TCR. Seems like wasting that GPA to take one of these offers when a reasonable LSAT increase would get you such better options in CA.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Are you sure that you're a URM? I would think the offers would be a bit better based on URM status and those numbers but I could be wrong.
-
071816

- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
what is your specific ethnic background?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Thinking the same thing..BigZuck wrote:Are you sure that you're a URM? I would think the offers would be a bit better based on URM status and those numbers but I could be wrong.
-
AlohaFriday

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Yes, I am URM. You can PM me for specifics but I am sure that my ethnicity is considered a URM. I was also wondering whether I got reasonable outcomes given my stats and it seems like I may have under-performed.
Would cramming and taking the LSAT in June be a poor decision? I am hesitant to sit out an entire cycle due to my PT range
Would cramming and taking the LSAT in June be a poor decision? I am hesitant to sit out an entire cycle due to my PT range
Last edited by AlohaFriday on Wed Apr 15, 2015 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- zombie mcavoy

- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:11 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Well you might be a URM but you sure didn't get a boost from it. None of these options are very attractive. USC is probably best here but that is still a relatively risky debt load for it. Better option is to get a job and retake though.
- KMart

- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
You did.AlohaFriday wrote:I was also wondering whether I got reasonable outcomes given my stats and it seems like I may have under-performed.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
You're black, Puerto Rican, Mexican, and/or Native American? And the schools knew that? I'd maybe go back and make sure your applications indicated that because it doesn't look like you got a bump at all.
-
indo

- Posts: 282
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:02 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
+1KMart wrote:You did.AlohaFriday wrote:I was also wondering whether I got reasonable outcomes given my stats and it seems like I may have under-performed.
-
AlohaFriday

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Thanks for the input, everyone. I understand that this is conjecture but could anyone give me any examples of typical outcomes someone with my stats could reasonably expect? I understand that this is a difficult and likely inaccurate estimation but everyone has lamented that my application has under-performed. I'd like a general idea of how badly it did
- zombie mcavoy

- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:11 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
if you were getting an AA boost as someone with a 168/3.9 Harvard would be a real possibility, and CCN would be blowing its collective load on you.AlohaFriday wrote:Thanks for the input, everyone. I understand that this is conjecture but could anyone give me any examples of typical outcomes someone with my stats could reasonably expect? I understand that this is a difficult and likely inaccurate estimation but everyone has lamented that my application has under-performed. I'd like a general idea of how badly it did
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Hand

- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
see this: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=245831zombie mcavoy wrote:if you were getting an AA boost as someone with a 168/3.9 Harvard would be a real possibility, and CCN would be blowing its collective load on you.AlohaFriday wrote:Thanks for the input, everyone. I understand that this is conjecture but could anyone give me any examples of typical outcomes someone with my stats could reasonably expect? I understand that this is a difficult and likely inaccurate estimation but everyone has lamented that my application has under-performed. I'd like a general idea of how badly it did
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Depends on what kind of URM, you might get better feedback on that in the URM forum.AlohaFriday wrote:Thanks for the input, everyone. I understand that this is conjecture but could anyone give me any examples of typical outcomes someone with my stats could reasonably expect? I understand that this is a difficult and likely inaccurate estimation but everyone has lamented that my application has under-performed. I'd like a general idea of how badly it did
http://www.mylsn.info might be somewhat helpful, I dunno.
-
AlohaFriday

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
I will sit tight to see if anything new comes up this cycle and consider retaking and/or reapplying. Thanks for all of the input
- Yea All Right

- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
I advise reapplying as well, and even retaking if you have the time. You should have gotten way better options, not just acceptances at schools that waitlisted/rejected you but also sizable scholarships.
Specifically speaking, I would have expected you to get into NYU, Penn, and Duke, perhaps Columbia if they don't mind the LSAT, and probably Boalt as long as you have a strong overall application with a good story.
Consider if you did anything badly on your application (personal statement or letters of recommendation?). You have a high GPA, you have a good LSAT, and you're an URM, so presumably you should have gotten better results. But you didn't, so at that point you need to consider the other parts of your application.
Specifically speaking, I would have expected you to get into NYU, Penn, and Duke, perhaps Columbia if they don't mind the LSAT, and probably Boalt as long as you have a strong overall application with a good story.
Consider if you did anything badly on your application (personal statement or letters of recommendation?). You have a high GPA, you have a good LSAT, and you're an URM, so presumably you should have gotten better results. But you didn't, so at that point you need to consider the other parts of your application.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
I agree with all of this, though it's still unclear if OP is one of NA, AA, MA, or PR. If so, reapply for SURE.Yea All Right wrote:I advise reapplying as well, and even retaking if you have the time. You should have gotten way better options, not just acceptances at schools that waitlisted/rejected you but also sizable scholarships.
Specifically speaking, I would have expected you to get into NYU, Penn, and Duke, perhaps Columbia if they don't mind the LSAT, and probably Boalt as long as you have a strong overall application with a good story.
Consider if you did anything badly on your application (personal statement or letters of recommendation?). You have a high GPA, you have a good LSAT, and you're an URM, so presumably you should have gotten better results. But you didn't, so at that point you need to consider the other parts of your application.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Way too many Michigan votes here.
Of the current options, I'd go USC.
Underperforming if you are an actual URM though.
Of the current options, I'd go USC.
Underperforming if you are an actual URM though.
-
KangarooCourt13

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:19 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Wait...USC is essentially a full ride?
Dude I would take that. Others are thrown off by this URM stuff...I don't know. At USC you could really be top of your class, if a place like Harvard takes you (as another has suggested) you risk being another body.
That's my two cents.
Dude I would take that. Others are thrown off by this URM stuff...I don't know. At USC you could really be top of your class, if a place like Harvard takes you (as another has suggested) you risk being another body.
That's my two cents.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
This is dumb, keep the changeKangarooCourt13 wrote:Wait...USC is essentially a full ride?
Dude I would take that. Others are thrown off by this URM stuff...I don't know. At USC you could really be top of your class, if a place like Harvard takes you (as another has suggested) you risk being another body.
That's my two cents.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
KangarooCourt13

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:19 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Are you this pleasant IRLBigZuck wrote:This is dumb, keep the changeKangarooCourt13 wrote:Wait...USC is essentially a full ride?
Dude I would take that. Others are thrown off by this URM stuff...I don't know. At USC you could really be top of your class, if a place like Harvard takes you (as another has suggested) you risk being another body.
That's my two cents.
- Clyde Frog

- Posts: 8985
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:27 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
AlohaFriday wrote:As deadlines approach, I am trying to decide where I should deposit. I have been accepted at Michigan, UCLA, USC, and Georgetown. I am awaiting decisions from Stanford, Columbia, and NYU. Wait listed at Harvard, Penn, and Duke. Rejected at Yale and Boalt. I did not apply to any other schools.
Scholarships/COA:
Michigan: $75,000 total; $142,284 COA
UCLA: $105,500 total; $118,484.98 COA (Will gain CA residency after 1L)
USC: $159,000 total, $92,469 COA
Georgetown: Yet to receive offer
I will be financing my education through loans.
I am from Hawaii, but I am currently an undergraduate in CA. I'd like to work in CA if possible. Not opposed to other markets, but CA is a preference. I would say my ties in the area are average.
I am hopeful for biglaw. Not entirely set on biglaw but definitely private practice. No interest in PI.
LSAT: 168; GPA: 3.9 (URM)
Took LSAT once after 6 months of classes. Was PTing in a wide range of 163-169 range about 1.5 months out. First LSAT was 157 or 159, can't remember.
I'd appreciate any input!
You're getting f'd in the A if you're only getting that as a URM with those numbers.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Yeah Kangaroo, this fallacy has been beaten to death.BigZuck wrote:This is dumb, keep the changeKangarooCourt13 wrote:At USC you could really be top of your class, if a place like Harvard takes you (as another has suggested) you risk being another body.
That's my two cents.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan vs. UCLA vs. USC
Probably lessKangarooCourt13 wrote:Are you this pleasant IRLBigZuck wrote:This is dumb, keep the changeKangarooCourt13 wrote:Wait...USC is essentially a full ride?
Dude I would take that. Others are thrown off by this URM stuff...I don't know. At USC you could really be top of your class, if a place like Harvard takes you (as another has suggested) you risk being another body.
That's my two cents.
It's alarming to me that you would say something like this because people might actually believe it
The OP really could be top of the class at Harvard. Or at USC. Or bottom of the class at Harvard. Or at USC. There is nothing to suggest the OP would do better at one or the other, and even if the OP is likely to do better at USC than at Harvard, I don't think it's near as stark as top of the class vs unwashed masses.
Anyway, to me it's all about average outcomes. If the average outcome at USC is fine for the OP, then fine. But going with the expectation (or whatever it is you're trying to say) that he/she will bink top of the class grades is dumb.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login