Chicago($) VS UVA($$) Forum
- Nothing but the Funk
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 3:47 pm
Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
With the exception of Michigan( which I'm not really all that crazy about) I have heard back from everyone. I am currently trying to negotiate but I don't expect a lot since only UVA and Chicago gave me anything to begin with.
Chicago: 60,000
UVA: 90,000
Including cost of living, differences in tuition, etc. UVA seems to be about 45,000 cheaper. However, if I choose UVA I will probable have to buy a car but I don't know how much of this would be compared to public transit costs in Chicago. My goal is public interest but I've been on this site long enough to know that might change.
Honestly, I would prefer to live in Chicago.I like the idea of a big city environment. Their smaller class size and focus on interdisciplinary study are also positives for me. So mainly I was just looking for other opinions.
Chicago: 60,000
UVA: 90,000
Including cost of living, differences in tuition, etc. UVA seems to be about 45,000 cheaper. However, if I choose UVA I will probable have to buy a car but I don't know how much of this would be compared to public transit costs in Chicago. My goal is public interest but I've been on this site long enough to know that might change.
Honestly, I would prefer to live in Chicago.I like the idea of a big city environment. Their smaller class size and focus on interdisciplinary study are also positives for me. So mainly I was just looking for other opinions.
-
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:43 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
the rationale you've provided justifies attending chicago
start a poll and provide just a little more info
start a poll and provide just a little more info
Last edited by FloridaCoastalorbust on Thu Mar 05, 2015 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:53 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Chicago based on your preferences. Maybe you can negotiate up.
- Winston1984
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Do you know where you want to work?
- Dog
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:00 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
This is highly relevant to OP's decision. Also, OP mentioned liking Chicago's city environment. It's probably worth mentioning UChi isn't exactly in the nicest part of the city.Winston1984 wrote:Do you know where you want to work?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:39 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
I made a similar choice (more like Chicago $ / UVA $$$ though). I had personal and professional reasons for choosing Chicago, but I also did some hard number crunching and it turned out that for various reasons it was a financial wash despite the difference in funding. Interdisciplinarity (meaning mostly but definitely not exclusively Econ and Poli Sci) as well as small size are good reasons to prefer Chicago over UVA, but you might also want to take a hard look at Chicago neighborhoods and CTA maps to help you crunch numbers. For example, if you live in Lakeview/Belmont the rent will be higher though not outrageous compared to Hyde Park but you'll probably need a car. If you live in South Loop rent will be a little higher than Hyde Park (though comparable to Regents, where most 1Ls and lots of 2Ls/3Ls stay) but you won't need a car.
Last edited by Snuffles1 on Thu Mar 05, 2015 12:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Has everyone given scholarships yet? There might be a lot of negotiating to do once more info comes out.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:55 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Hyde Park isn't bad at all. Areas to the south of it aren't good, but campus is niceDog wrote:This is highly relevant to OP's decision. Also, OP mentioned liking Chicago's city environment. It's probably worth mentioning UChi isn't exactly in the nicest part of the city.Winston1984 wrote:Do you know where you want to work?
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
NU has yet to make offers to non-ED applicants. Wait for that OP (assuming you applied there &U got accepted).Tiago Splitter wrote:Has everyone given scholarships yet? There might be a lot of negotiating to do once more info comes out.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Man that Gacy tar is creepy
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Pogo can be your friend too har harTiago Splitter wrote:Man that Gacy tar is creepy
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Was thinking that but the OP said they had heard back from everyone except Michigan. Something doesn't add up.Tiago Splitter wrote:Has everyone given scholarships yet? There might be a lot of negotiating to do once more info comes out.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
I agree there should be more options, but not a lot more money; $60k is more than I got from Chicago, although that was a long time ago. Idk. I don't feel remiss approving Chicago here unless OP has a good thing going now, wants to live in Chicago and will sit the cycle out for an ED Northwestern.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
(Side note: with tuition exceeding $60k next year and assuming loans for living expenses downtown, the ED scholarship from Northwestern, $150k over three years, can easily still leave students w/o independent assets in $100,000+ debt after interest. Not a panacea.)
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Sure, but I'll take 100K debt at Northwestern over 250K debt at CCN every day of the week and twice on Sundays.jbagelboy wrote:I agree there should be more options, but not a lot more money; $60k is more than I got from Chicago, although that was a long time ago. Idk. I don't feel remiss approving Chicago here unless OP has a good thing going now, wants to live in Chicago and will sit the cycle out for an ED Northwestern.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
(Side note: with tuition exceeding $60k next year and assuming loans for living expenses downtown, the ED scholarship from Northwestern, $150k over three years, can easily still leave students w/o independent assets in $100,000+ debt after interest. Not a panacea.)
More likely than not, this poster will be getting in line at the big law drone factory just like everyone else and I don't think Chicago is worth 150K extra debt just to enjoy Kirkland and Ellis instead of mcdermott will and emery.
(of course I don't know anything about Chicago's Chicago big law placement vs NU's but I'm assuming it's not 150K better)
- Dog
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:00 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
There are actually slightly more NU grads than UChi grads at K & E ' s Chicago office.BigZuck wrote:Sure, but I'll take 100K debt at Northwestern over 250K debt at CCN every day of the week and twice on Sundays.jbagelboy wrote:I agree there should be more options, but not a lot more money; $60k is more than I got from Chicago, although that was a long time ago. Idk. I don't feel remiss approving Chicago here unless OP has a good thing going now, wants to live in Chicago and will sit the cycle out for an ED Northwestern.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
(Side note: with tuition exceeding $60k next year and assuming loans for living expenses downtown, the ED scholarship from Northwestern, $150k over three years, can easily still leave students w/o independent assets in $100,000+ debt after interest. Not a panacea.)
More likely than not, this poster will be getting in line at the big law drone factory just like everyone else and I don't think Chicago is worth 150K extra debt just to enjoy Kirkland and Ellis instead of McDermott Will and Emery.
(of course I don't know anything about Chicago's Chicago big law placement vs NU's but I'm assuming it's not 150K better)
- Nothing but the Funk
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
I'll try to address all the questions asked.
I'd really like to avoid new york after graduation, but other then that I am pretty open. Snuffles I would love to hear more about what math lead you to that conclusion. I plan on living around HP, at least for the first year. Applied at Duke, Michigan, Harvard, Stanford, UVA, Chicago, and Georgetown. I think that should answer everything.
I'd really like to avoid new york after graduation, but other then that I am pretty open. Snuffles I would love to hear more about what math lead you to that conclusion. I plan on living around HP, at least for the first year. Applied at Duke, Michigan, Harvard, Stanford, UVA, Chicago, and Georgetown. I think that should answer everything.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- UnicornHunter
- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Random list of schools. Honestly, I would consider sitting out and throwing apps at Cornell, northwestern, Columbia, Penn, and NYU as well as your list next cycle. Even if you have some weird reason for not attending, you lost a lot of leverage by not applying broadly.
If you go, I don't think either option is bad...just not great. It's a lot of debt to take on.
If you go, I don't think either option is bad...just not great. It's a lot of debt to take on.
- LawBron James
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Not necessarily, those are basically my numbers (I have a slightly higher LSAT), and those schools essentially gave me the same scholarship offers (though I also have a pretty nice NYU offer). The YP is real this cycle. I don't know about about OP but I've been held at NW and Columbia, WL'd at Penn and Berk, and lowballed (in my estimation) by Duke and UVa.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
Anyways, there's still time for negotiation, OP. I'm personally leaning Chicago, but the cycle's not over yet.
Last edited by LawBron James on Thu Mar 05, 2015 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
I would sit out and have a proper admissions cycle next year. Blanket the T14 and retake in June or September. Even if you would never in a million billion years attend, say, Cornell, you need to apply for scholarship purposes.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
You applied ED to NU and were held?LawBron James wrote:Not necessarily, those are basically my numbers (slightly higher LSAT), and those schools essentially gave me the same scholarship offers (though I also have a pretty nice NYU offer). The YP is real this cycle. I don't know about about OP but I've been held at NW and Columbia, WL'd at Penn and Berk, and lowballed (in my estimation) by Duke and UVa.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
Anyways, there's still time for negotiation, OP. I'm personally leaning Chicago, but the cycle's not over yet.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LawBron James
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
No, RD. Not sure what my outcome would have been if I had ED'd, but I wanted to see my options anyways. I was more disagreeing that he's had a terrible cycle when it seems to me that he's had a pretty standard cycle so far.BigZuck wrote:You applied ED to NU and were held?LawBron James wrote:Not necessarily, those are basically my numbers (slightly higher LSAT), and those schools essentially gave me the same scholarship offers (though I also have a pretty nice NYU offer). The YP is real this cycle. I don't know about about OP but I've been held at NW and Columbia, WL'd at Penn and Berk, and lowballed (in my estimation) by Duke and UVa.BigZuck wrote:If you have a 172/3.8 then something went seriously wrong with your cycle. I would withdraw and see if you can rectify it and reapply next year. 150K at NU would be better than either of these and I would think that would be well within your grasp (correct me if I'm wrong about NU ED though guys, I haven't followed this cycle very closely).
Anyways, there's still time for negotiation, OP. I'm personally leaning Chicago, but the cycle's not over yet.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
The cycle went seriously wrong when the OP didn't apply to all the schools they should have. There's no logical reason to apply to Chicago and Duke but not Northwestern.
Maybe those numbers really are a no man's land now. In a declining application market, the lower T14 is afraid they will get burned and CCN hasn't realized they should offer good money. I don't know. Maybe write more "Why Xs" and locis? It sucks that numbers like that either need to go into 250K debt at a higher ranked school or not even get in at all at a lower ranked school.
Maybe those numbers really are a no man's land now. In a declining application market, the lower T14 is afraid they will get burned and CCN hasn't realized they should offer good money. I don't know. Maybe write more "Why Xs" and locis? It sucks that numbers like that either need to go into 250K debt at a higher ranked school or not even get in at all at a lower ranked school.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Definitely hang tough on waitlists. Could be one of those years where a desperate NYU or someone offers a bunch of money off the waitlist.
- LawBron James
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago($) VS UVA($$)
Yeah I'm with you on that first point, the lower T14 have been pretty unpredictable this cycle, though, except maybe Cornell and Georgetown, so I guess there's no way to say for sure.BigZuck wrote:The cycle went seriously wrong when the OP didn't apply to all the schools they should have. There's no logical reason to apply to Chicago and Duke but not Northwestern.
Maybe those numbers really are a no man's land now. In a declining application market, the lower T14 is afraid they will get burned and CCN hasn't realized they should offer good money. I don't know. Maybe write more "Why Xs" and locis? It sucks that numbers like that either need to go into 250K debt at a higher ranked school or not even get in at all at a lower ranked school.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login