They use basically the same methodology as DW-Nominate to score the political persuasions of supreme court justices and then see where the clerks from each school go.
Predictably, Berkeley and NYU are the most liberal; UVA the most conservative.


Greatcotiger wrote:http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the ... ools/#ss-3
They use basically the same methodology as DW-Nominate to score the political persuasions of supreme court justices and then see where the clerks from each school go.
Predictably, Berkeley and NYU are the most liberal; UVA the most conservative.
Right, this. This data tells us much more about which schools the respective wings of the court will consider hiring from than the politics of the schools themselves.nothingtosee wrote:So do H and Y have bimodal curves because they send so many clerks out total, whereas only the conservatives look at Penn/UVA grads? Other interpretations?
Carter1901 wrote:Egregious Duke/Cornell trolling.
Rehnquist must just have been a self-loving sucker for his alam mater.jbagelboy wrote:this is basically what I would have expected, with my only surprise being stanford.
More like UT/Georgetown trolling, unless Duke and Cornell can lay claim to a significant number of the clerks with no law schools listed on this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_la ... ted_StatesCarter1901 wrote:Egregious Duke/Cornell trolling.
Stanford Law has a fairly large conglomerate of alumni in Texas so it's actually not too surprising to me that a high number of their graduates are conservatives. Not that every lawyer in Texas that went to Stanford is conservative but one would think that the majority arejbagelboy wrote:this is basically what I would have expected, with my only surprise being stanford.