Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Hewertt

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:39 pm

Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Hewertt » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:05 pm

Applying this year to these schools among others in CA. I am planning on working in LA / southern CA and am leaning towards civil/business lit.

LSAT 156 GPA 3.25
Softs: sub ivy undergrad, leadership / president of pre-law student group.
NOT retaking.

Does anyone have any valuable input on weighing the trade offs between these schools? Is UCI or Davis worth considering with my numbers / softs? OC native so I will probably live at home if admitted to Chapman or UCI.

Does anyone have any experience to share regarding financial aid with these schools given my numbers?

I am obviously okay with not pursuing biglaw so please don't consider that route.

Thanks everyone.

User avatar
Manteca

Silver
Posts: 1287
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:55 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Manteca » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:06 pm

Why can't you retake?

Hewertt

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Hewertt » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:07 pm

Because it is not an option

Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Mal Reynolds » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:08 pm

Thanks for posting a list of the schools no one should ever attend.

Hewertt

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Hewertt » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:11 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:Thanks for posting a list of the schools no one should ever attend.

Thanks for the valuable input. You know your stuff.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Mal Reynolds » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:13 pm

Hewertt wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:Thanks for posting a list of the schools no one should ever attend.

Thanks for the valuable input. You know your stuff.
I mean really. Your scores mean that you will be getting nothing from these schools. You will be fucked with that much debt.

User avatar
Ramius

Gold
Posts: 2018
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Ramius » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:15 pm

Softs: sub ivy undergrad, leadership / president of pre-law student group.
I love this part.

What is a sub ivy undergrad?

User avatar
deadpanic

Silver
Posts: 1290
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:09 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by deadpanic » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:19 pm

Hewertt wrote:Because it is not an option
Explain why it is not an option.

If you attend any of these schools, the most likely scenario is that you will end up with massive debt and will not get a job as a lawyer.

With your numbers, you will not receive any significant scholarship $ and will be 200k+ in debt. What kind of job are you going to get to pay that out? You will be lucky to snag a 50K/year law job from any of those--seriously, that would be a GREAT outcome from one of these schools. And your odds at landing one of those are not even very good.

Everyone here is trying to help you out, honestly.

Hewertt

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Hewertt » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:32 pm

deadpanic wrote:
Hewertt wrote:Because it is not an option
Explain why it is not an option.

If you attend any of these schools, the most likely scenario is that you will end up with massive debt and will not get a job as a lawyer.

With your numbers, you will not receive any significant scholarship $ and will be 200k+ in debt. What kind of job are you going to get to pay that out? You will be lucky to snag a 50K/year law job from any of those--seriously, that would be a GREAT outcome from one of these schools. And your odds at landing one of those are not even very good.

Everyone here is trying to help you out, honestly.

I am overloading for the rest of the year, working, and am not banking on a significant jump in my score. I won't be able to take in dec or February and will not be taking a gap year. Ok I got that I won't be getting scholarship money, and will have a VERY tough time getting a job. Moving forward - any more feedback?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Mal Reynolds » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:35 pm

You should take off a year to work and study for the LSAT. No more feedback necessary.

User avatar
Ramius

Gold
Posts: 2018
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Ramius » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:36 pm

Hewertt wrote:
deadpanic wrote:
Hewertt wrote:Because it is not an option
Explain why it is not an option.

If you attend any of these schools, the most likely scenario is that you will end up with massive debt and will not get a job as a lawyer.

With your numbers, you will not receive any significant scholarship $ and will be 200k+ in debt. What kind of job are you going to get to pay that out? You will be lucky to snag a 50K/year law job from any of those--seriously, that would be a GREAT outcome from one of these schools. And your odds at landing one of those are not even very good.

Everyone here is trying to help you out, honestly.

I am overloading for the rest of the year, working, and am not banking on a significant jump in my score. I won't be able to take in dec or February and will not be taking a gap year. Ok I got that I won't be getting scholarship money, and will have a VERY tough time getting a job. Moving forward - any more feedback?
What more feedback do you need?

AReasonableMan

Gold
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by AReasonableMan » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:39 pm

Nobody cares about your extracurriculars. President of prelate club sounds like the least fun college kid ever. Zero chance a school thinks he's 156 but pre law president or a firm thinks he goes to a TTT but he was prelate president!! The website prestige!

Hewertt

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Hewertt » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:53 pm

AReasonableMan wrote:Nobody cares about your extracurriculars. President of prelate club sounds like the least fun college kid ever. Zero chance a school thinks he's 156 but pre law president or a firm thinks he goes to a TTT but he was prelate president!! The website prestige!
Thanks for the valuable input. How many times have you saved the world? Do you know anything about these schools other than that they cost a lot and that employment prospects are difficult?

You're all are pretty well versed. Retake, you're an idiot, no job, all debt, but no one knows anything about the advantages of choosing one over the other?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Ramius

Gold
Posts: 2018
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Ramius » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:57 pm

Hewertt wrote:
AReasonableMan wrote:Nobody cares about your extracurriculars. President of prelate club sounds like the least fun college kid ever. Zero chance a school thinks he's 156 but pre law president or a firm thinks he goes to a TTT but he was prelate president!! The website prestige!
Thanks for the valuable input. How many times have you saved the world? Do you know anything about these schools other than that they cost a lot and that employment prospects are difficult?

You're all are pretty well versed. Retake, you're an idiot, no job, all debt, but no one knows anything about the advantages of choosing one over the other?
You're fun, and if this is the way you approach $270k debt, you deserve it.

User avatar
eriedoctrine

Bronze
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 1:00 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by eriedoctrine » Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:58 pm


Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Mal Reynolds » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:00 pm

Hewertt wrote:
AReasonableMan wrote:Nobody cares about your extracurriculars. President of prelate club sounds like the least fun college kid ever. Zero chance a school thinks he's 156 but pre law president or a firm thinks he goes to a TTT but he was prelate president!! The website prestige!
Thanks for the valuable input. How many times have you saved the world? Do you know anything about these schools other than that they cost a lot and that employment prospects are difficult?

You're all are pretty well versed. Retake, you're an idiot, no job, all debt, but no one knows anything about the advantages of choosing one over the other?
The only relevant difference is whether you would rather be saddled with insurmountable debt and horrendous job prospects in northern or southern California. So the world is your oyster!

User avatar
Louis1127

Silver
Posts: 817
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:12 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Louis1127 » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:01 pm

Hewertt wrote:
AReasonableMan wrote:Nobody cares about your extracurriculars. President of prelate club sounds like the least fun college kid ever. Zero chance a school thinks he's 156 but pre law president or a firm thinks he goes to a TTT but he was prelate president!! The website prestige!
Thanks for the valuable input. How many times have you saved the world? Do you know anything about these schools other than that they cost a lot and that employment prospects are difficult?

You're all are pretty well versed. Retake, you're an idiot, no job, all debt, but no one knows anything about the advantages of choosing one over the other?
I mean, those are pretty important things about those schools that applicants should know.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Hand

Gold
Posts: 3843
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Hand » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:08 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:
Hewertt wrote:
AReasonableMan wrote:Nobody cares about your extracurriculars. President of prelate club sounds like the least fun college kid ever. Zero chance a school thinks he's 156 but pre law president or a firm thinks he goes to a TTT but he was prelate president!! The website prestige!
Thanks for the valuable input. How many times have you saved the world? Do you know anything about these schools other than that they cost a lot and that employment prospects are difficult?

You're all are pretty well versed. Retake, you're an idiot, no job, all debt, but no one knows anything about the advantages of choosing one over the other?
The only relevant difference is whether you would rather be saddled with insurmountable debt and horrendous job prospects in northern or southern California. So the world is your oyster!
Seriously OP, why come asking for advice if you don't want to hear it? These schools are all terrible. You know what's worse than having to come up with a plan for the year? Graduating with massive debt from a piece of shit school. Not retaking or altogether reconsidering your aspirations because you don't want to take a gap year (are you k-jd?) is like refusing to have the bandaid ripped off now at the cost of getting your limbs amputated three years later. Don't be an idiot, retake until you have a score where you can, say, get decent money from Davis.

AReasonableMan

Gold
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by AReasonableMan » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:27 pm

Hewertt wrote:
AReasonableMan wrote:Nobody cares about your extracurriculars. President of prelate club sounds like the least fun college kid ever. Zero chance a school thinks he's 156 but pre law president or a firm thinks he goes to a TTT but he was prelate president!! The website prestige!
Thanks for the valuable input. How many times have you saved the world? Do you know anything about these schools other than that they cost a lot and that employment prospects are difficult?

You're all are pretty well versed. Retake, you're an idiot, no job, all debt, but no one knows anything about the advantages of choosing one over the other?
I know about these schools, the area that the other three are in, and the statistics. Your focus on your useless extracurriculars showcases how you are approaching this wrong. There are extremes on both ends (gold medal winner, or sits with arms folded and no eye contact), but for the most part you are a statistic. The schools you are going to are statistics.

There's a presumption that people who don't get a good job have something wrong with them, but that's not the case. There's little correlation between the two. I am not one of these people in a similarly stressful position so have no personal bias in the matter. The way the system works you either get an elite job or you get a tough shake. There's no middle ground. At these schools, it's mostly only lower ground.
Last edited by AReasonableMan on Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

NYCFAN1

New
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:00 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by NYCFAN1 » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:36 pm

UCLA and USC are risky propositions nowadays...the law schools you listed shouldn't even exist

retake

Big Dog

Silver
Posts: 1205
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by Big Dog » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:42 pm

Does anyone have any valuable input on weighing the trade offs between these schools?
Do not attend these schools. Period.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
ManoftheHour

Gold
Posts: 3486
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by ManoftheHour » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:43 pm

For CA schools, no option below UCI/UC Davis WITH near a full ride should ever be considered. And that's probably generous for this board.

AReasonableMan

Gold
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by AReasonableMan » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:54 pm

There's a thread in the legal employment section about a kid in the top quarter who struck out. I don't know them but would be willing to bet you wouldn't think they were especially weird if you met them. Even if you graded onto law review from these four skills, it's still more likely than not you would struggle to pay back the two-hundred grand in debt you're taking on.

User avatar
banjo

Silver
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by banjo » Mon Oct 27, 2014 1:44 am

Hewertt wrote:Do you know anything about these schools other than that they cost a lot and that employment prospects are difficult?
Yes, we know that these schools hire a bunch of HYS JDs to teach contracts, torts, civ pro, crim, and other basic courses using the case method of instruction. Just like every other ABA-accredited law school in this country.

When you ignore all the factors that truly distinguish law schools, that's what you're left with.

User avatar
TheSpanishMain

Gold
Posts: 4744
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: Hastings, Loyola, Santa Clara, Chapman

Post by TheSpanishMain » Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:51 am

Hewertt wrote:no job, all debt, but no one knows anything about the advantages of choosing one over the other?
The advantages of choosing one law school over another are all about jobs and debt. What else are you hoping to hear about? Parking availability? Number of students per Chipotle?

OP, I suspect you've thrown your hands up and written off TLS, but in case you're still reading, retake is never "not an option." Or, rather, "don't go to law school" is always an option. If you truly can't or won't improve your LSAT substantially, then you just shouldn't go to law school. I would have thought someone in a pre-law club would have understood the importance of the LSAT. "I'm taking a lot of classes my senior year" is certainly not a reason. Wait a few years to go. Get some work experience.
Last edited by TheSpanishMain on Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Locked

Return to “Choosing a Law School”