Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame Forum
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:55 pm
Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Wanted to get your advice again. Submitted first deposit at Notre Dame and second deposit is due on the 6th. Was sold on ND until some WL movement...
Got a call Monday from UCLA, in off the WL -- I must tell them my decision by June 9th.
Yesterday, got a call from UPenn. She wanted to gauge my interest, etc. She said there is no more merit-based aid available. I did not qualify for need-based aid at ND, so not likely at UPenn either. She told me to call her back Friday and let her know whether or not I would attend if admitted.
At ND I have a $10,000/year scholarship, sent email to UCLA about aid and have not heard back yet, and Penn would obviously be sticker price.
Is UPenn at sticker worth it? If I get admitted to Penn off the WL and accept their offer, could I then use other WL offers (still riding UVA, Michigan, Duke, and Vandy) as leverage for aid, or is my acceptance off the WL binding?
Thanks in advance for your help!
-----
Edit:
New to TLS, so I didn't know what a sticky was -- sorry! Here is the info...
-The schools you are considering
Penn, UCLA, and ND (on WL at UVA, Michigan, Duke, and Vandy)
-The total Cost of Attendance (COA) of each. COA = cost of tuition + fees + books + cost of living (COL) + accumulated interest - scholarships.
~$240,000 at each school
-How you will be financing your COA, i.e. loans, family, or savings
Graduated from UG in December for 1/2 year WE and money. Will have that bit of savings. Getting married in July and wife will be a elementary school teacher. Looking mostly at loans.
-Where you are from and where you want to work, and other places where you have significant ties (if any)
From Indiana. Only really have significant ties here but I would like to do sports law or litigation. Would not mind BigLaw and understand that may be a necessity with the debt I will be accruing.
-Your general career goals
To work as a sports agent or litigator.
-Your LSAT/GPA numbers
Reverse splitter.
-How many times you have taken the LSAT
Once, but will be retaking this coming Monday.
Got a call Monday from UCLA, in off the WL -- I must tell them my decision by June 9th.
Yesterday, got a call from UPenn. She wanted to gauge my interest, etc. She said there is no more merit-based aid available. I did not qualify for need-based aid at ND, so not likely at UPenn either. She told me to call her back Friday and let her know whether or not I would attend if admitted.
At ND I have a $10,000/year scholarship, sent email to UCLA about aid and have not heard back yet, and Penn would obviously be sticker price.
Is UPenn at sticker worth it? If I get admitted to Penn off the WL and accept their offer, could I then use other WL offers (still riding UVA, Michigan, Duke, and Vandy) as leverage for aid, or is my acceptance off the WL binding?
Thanks in advance for your help!
-----
Edit:
New to TLS, so I didn't know what a sticky was -- sorry! Here is the info...
-The schools you are considering
Penn, UCLA, and ND (on WL at UVA, Michigan, Duke, and Vandy)
-The total Cost of Attendance (COA) of each. COA = cost of tuition + fees + books + cost of living (COL) + accumulated interest - scholarships.
~$240,000 at each school
-How you will be financing your COA, i.e. loans, family, or savings
Graduated from UG in December for 1/2 year WE and money. Will have that bit of savings. Getting married in July and wife will be a elementary school teacher. Looking mostly at loans.
-Where you are from and where you want to work, and other places where you have significant ties (if any)
From Indiana. Only really have significant ties here but I would like to do sports law or litigation. Would not mind BigLaw and understand that may be a necessity with the debt I will be accruing.
-Your general career goals
To work as a sports agent or litigator.
-Your LSAT/GPA numbers
Reverse splitter.
-How many times you have taken the LSAT
Once, but will be retaking this coming Monday.
Last edited by coreaves23 on Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- John Everyman
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:20 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Voted penn at sticker, but if you've got that, you should be getting a lot more from nd, also, what region are you dealing with here?
- Mullens
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
All of these options are too expensive but Penn is definitely worth $30,000 more than ND, especially considering you would need Biglaw to pay off the debt at all of your options.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
acceptance off of waitlist is not binding
What's the total COA for each school? I imagine UCLA will be the most expensive since its COL will probably be the highest?
Where do you want to work? Is re-taking an option?
What's the total COA for each school? I imagine UCLA will be the most expensive since its COL will probably be the highest?
Where do you want to work? Is re-taking an option?
- Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Leverage the Penn offer for aid at UCLA and ND.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- anyriotgirl
- Posts: 8349
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
how did you get into penn without money anywhere else?
-
- Posts: 21482
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
This. None of these schools are worth it at those prices. Where do you want to practice? Please read the sticky and post all the missing info.Dr.Zer0 wrote:Leverage the Penn offer for aid at UCLA and ND.
-
- Posts: 21482
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Maybe a reverse splitter? Back when I applied I got T6 money but jack shit from UCLA and other T2s, even when I tried to leverage.anyriotgirl wrote:how did you get into penn without money anywhere else?
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
John Everyman - I'm from Indiana, so I think ND got the impression that they could get me to stay close to home for close to nothing.
cusenation - Great to hear, thank you. I was not sure if WL-acceptance was binding. Yeah, COL of living in UCLA is definitely highest, however I could get resident tuition after 1L which would help a little bit. Not sure of exact COA, but all will be ~$225,000, with UCLA maybe be a little less.
I would like to work in sports law (impossible according to TLS), but I would also love litigation at a big firm, which would probably be a necessity given the debt I will accrue. I have heeded the wisdom of TLS and will be retaking this coming Monday.
Dr. Zer0 - Can I leverage without the offer in hand? Sounds like she will maybe offer Friday, but don't want mislead ND in case she doesn't. Do I just ask for an extension on the second deposit deadline for ND and more money?
anyriotgirl - Not sure to be honest, but I am a reverse splitter
cusenation - Great to hear, thank you. I was not sure if WL-acceptance was binding. Yeah, COL of living in UCLA is definitely highest, however I could get resident tuition after 1L which would help a little bit. Not sure of exact COA, but all will be ~$225,000, with UCLA maybe be a little less.
I would like to work in sports law (impossible according to TLS), but I would also love litigation at a big firm, which would probably be a necessity given the debt I will accrue. I have heeded the wisdom of TLS and will be retaking this coming Monday.
Dr. Zer0 - Can I leverage without the offer in hand? Sounds like she will maybe offer Friday, but don't want mislead ND in case she doesn't. Do I just ask for an extension on the second deposit deadline for ND and more money?
anyriotgirl - Not sure to be honest, but I am a reverse splitter
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Yes, this is exactly my situation.ymmv wrote:Maybe a reverse splitter? Back when I applied I got T6 money but jack shit from UCLA and other T2s, even when I tried to leverage.anyriotgirl wrote:how did you get into penn without money anywhere else?
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
If you are a reverse splitter, retake the LSAT in the fall and get way better options than paying sticker. Keep working and save up some money. If you want to be an agent, you should intern/work first at a sports agency or with a pro team before going to law school. Otherwise, not likely at all
If you're hell bent on going this year, then go with Penn. Sticker is terrible and you'll be forced to do big law for at least 5 years, but at least you'll get big law. UCLA and ND at those prices require big law as well, but with not nearly the same likelihood
If you're hell bent on going this year, then go with Penn. Sticker is terrible and you'll be forced to do big law for at least 5 years, but at least you'll get big law. UCLA and ND at those prices require big law as well, but with not nearly the same likelihood
- Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
This shouldn't happen to reverse splitters (High GPA, Low LSAT) but I can see this happening to Splitters (High LSAT, Low GPA).coreaves23 wrote:Yes, this is exactly my situation.ymmv wrote:Maybe a reverse splitter? Back when I applied I got T6 money but jack shit from UCLA and other T2s, even when I tried to leverage.anyriotgirl wrote:how did you get into penn without money anywhere else?
If you are a reverse splitter then you should prbly retake the LSAT.
-
- Posts: 21482
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
This is not even close to certain. Penn's placement is excellent, but there are still a substantial number of unemployed 2Ls every year.thebobs1987 wrote:If you are a reverse splitter, retake the LSAT in the fall and get way better options than paying sticker. Keep working and save up some money. If you want to be an agent, you should intern/work first at a sports agency or with a pro team before going to law school. Otherwise, not likely at all
If you're hell bent on going this year, then go with Penn. Sticker is terrible and you'll be forced to do big law for at least 5 years, but at least you'll get big law. UCLA and ND at those prices require big law as well, but with not nearly the same likelihood
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
True, I should have said likely get big law. Retake and gain work experience is obviously TCRymmv wrote:This is not even close to certain. Penn's placement is excellent, but there are still a substantial number of unemployed 2Ls every year.thebobs1987 wrote:If you are a reverse splitter, retake the LSAT in the fall and get way better options than paying sticker. Keep working and save up some money. If you want to be an agent, you should intern/work first at a sports agency or with a pro team before going to law school. Otherwise, not likely at all
If you're hell bent on going this year, then go with Penn. Sticker is terrible and you'll be forced to do big law for at least 5 years, but at least you'll get big law. UCLA and ND at those prices require big law as well, but with not nearly the same likelihood
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
I appreciate your input! Hopefully my retake this Monday will be good enough to get some money out of the WLs on which I am currently sitting. I thought about taking a year off and working, but my psych UG really only allows me to make ~$28,000. Just feel like law school, even at that price, would be worth not having to work another year for peanuts. I have an ex-travel ball coach who is a sports agent now (Greg Oden, Darren McFadden, etc.) and he said he would let me intern, but not until 1L summer.thebobs1987 wrote:If you are a reverse splitter, retake the LSAT in the fall and get way better options than paying sticker. Keep working and save up some money. If you want to be an agent, you should intern/work first at a sports agency or with a pro team before going to law school. Otherwise, not likely at all
If you're hell bent on going this year, then go with Penn. Sticker is terrible and you'll be forced to do big law for at least 5 years, but at least you'll get big law. UCLA and ND at those prices require big law as well, but with not nearly the same likelihood
If I can coax half scholly or so out of ND, does it then become the better choice? When I spoke with UCLA they went on about how their sports and entertainment law is #1 in the country, so I should go there. Just not sure if Penn opens up a plethora of options that the others do not.
- Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Some schools don't ask for proof. You could say that UPenn called you up and made a tacit offer. If they call bs then I would just tell UPenn you are going, get that admissions offer in writing then take it to ND and UCLA. Ask ND for the extension in the meantime, if they ask why just tell them about the UPenn offer and how you want to go check out the campus before making a commitment.coreaves23 wrote: Dr. Zer0 - Can I leverage without the offer in hand? Sounds like she will maybe offer Friday, but don't want mislead ND in case she doesn't. Do I just ask for an extension on the second deposit deadline for ND and more money?
If you feel bad about deceiving schools don't. Law schools play dirty too (just look at UPenn they want you to commit to their school before they give you an offer just so they can protect their yield). Additionally I don't think you run the risk of getting your offer rescinded, but I might be wrong.
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Penn is definitely the safer choice in terms of getting big law and really any job. Personally I wouldn't go more than 100k in debt for either UCLA or ND. But I wouldn't pay sticker at Penn either. Good luck with your retake this Monday.coreaves23 wrote:I appreciate your input! Hopefully my retake this Monday will be good enough to get some money out of the WLs on which I am currently sitting. I thought about taking a year off and working, but my psych UG really only allows me to make ~$28,000. Just feel like law school, even at that price, would be worth not having to work another year for peanuts. I have an ex-travel ball coach who is a sports agent now (Greg Oden, Darren McFadden, etc.) and he said he would let me intern, but not until 1L summer.thebobs1987 wrote:If you are a reverse splitter, retake the LSAT in the fall and get way better options than paying sticker. Keep working and save up some money. If you want to be an agent, you should intern/work first at a sports agency or with a pro team before going to law school. Otherwise, not likely at all
If you're hell bent on going this year, then go with Penn. Sticker is terrible and you'll be forced to do big law for at least 5 years, but at least you'll get big law. UCLA and ND at those prices require big law as well, but with not nearly the same likelihood
If I can coax half scholly or so out of ND, does it then become the better choice? When I spoke with UCLA they went on about how their sports and entertainment law is #1 in the country, so I should go there. Just not sure if Penn opens up a plethora of options that the others do not.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Retaking on Monday. I don't know when enough is enough though. I see retake as the answer on here so many times (and obviously I heeded that advice), but when do you just cut your losses and go? I guess I would have to hire a tutor, etc. and go for 173+ to go with my 4.0 (LSDAS 4.09), because I have self-studied up to this point (PowerScore Bibles, LSAT Trainer, and all PT's 29-70) and yet I still have maxed out at a 169 (twice).Dr.Zer0 wrote:This shouldn't happen to reverse splitters (High GPA, Low LSAT) but I can see this happening to Splitters (High LSAT, Low GPA).coreaves23 wrote:Yes, this is exactly my situation.ymmv wrote:Maybe a reverse splitter? Back when I applied I got T6 money but jack shit from UCLA and other T2s, even when I tried to leverage.anyriotgirl wrote:how did you get into penn without money anywhere else?
If you are a reverse splitter then you should prbly retake the LSAT.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Haha, great point. That is exactly what UCLA and Penn have done. Can't blame them, but it is interesting to be on the receiving end of one of those phone calls. I will definitely email ND tonight and just say that I received the call from UPenn -- leave the ball in their court.Dr.Zer0 wrote:Some schools don't ask for proof. You could say that UPenn called you up and made a tacit offer. If they call bs then I would just tell UPenn you are going, get that admissions offer in writing then take it to ND and UCLA. Ask ND for the extension in the meantime, if they ask why just tell them about the UPenn offer and how you want to go check out the campus before making a commitment.coreaves23 wrote: Dr. Zer0 - Can I leverage without the offer in hand? Sounds like she will maybe offer Friday, but don't want mislead ND in case she doesn't. Do I just ask for an extension on the second deposit deadline for ND and more money?
If you feel bad about deceiving schools don't. Law schools play dirty too (just look at UPenn they want you to commit to their school before they give you an offer just so they can protect their yield). Additionally I don't think you run the risk of getting your offer rescinded, but I might be wrong.
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
Retaking on Monday. I don't know when enough is enough though. I see retake as the answer on here so many times (and obviously I heeded that advice), but when do you just cut your losses and go? I guess I would have to hire a tutor, etc. and go for 173+ to go with my 4.0 (LSDAS 4.09), because I have self-studied up to this point (PowerScore Bibles, LSAT Trainer, and all PT's 29-70) and yet I still have maxed out at a 169 (twice).[/quote]
You have a 4.0 and a 169 and these are your offers? You should be in at several t14s and be close to a full ride at ND/UCLA. Did you apply late or do you have C&F issues?
If not, you should think about reapplying next year.
You have a 4.0 and a 169 and these are your offers? You should be in at several t14s and be close to a full ride at ND/UCLA. Did you apply late or do you have C&F issues?
If not, you should think about reapplying next year.
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
None of these are good options, especially since you're a reverse splitter. No question Penn is the best option of the three, but even at a top school debt-financed sticker is daunting.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- transferror
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 5:42 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
You need to sit out. There's no reason to pay sticker at any non-HYS with a 4.0. You might be able to ED NU with your current numbers, and improving on the LSAT by a few points puts you on Harvard's radar and big $$ throughout the T14.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:55 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
You have a 4.0 and a 169 and these are your offers? You should be in at several t14s and be close to a full ride at ND/UCLA. Did you apply late or do you have C&F issues?thebobs1987 wrote:Retaking on Monday. I don't know when enough is enough though. I see retake as the answer on here so many times (and obviously I heeded that advice), but when do you just cut your losses and go? I guess I would have to hire a tutor, etc. and go for 173+ to go with my 4.0 (LSDAS 4.09), because I have self-studied up to this point (PowerScore Bibles, LSAT Trainer, and all PT's 29-70) and yet I still have maxed out at a 169 (twice).
If not, you should think about reapplying next year.[/quote]
No, no, no -- my apologies for any confusion! My LSAT was not a 169 when I took last June, that is what I have been PTing at during my studying this time around. Fluctuating anywhere from 165-169.
That is why I am retaking on Monday. If I don't make the jump through self-studying, should I get a tutor? Take a class?transferror wrote:You need to sit out. There's no reason to pay sticker at any non-HYS with a 4.0. You might be able to ED NU with your current numbers, and improving on the LSAT by a few points puts you on Harvard's radar and big $$ throughout the T14.
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
also retaking Monday in Indiana good luck!
-
- Posts: 21482
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Penn v.s. UCLA v.s. Notre Dame
coreaves23 wrote:You have a 4.0 and a 169 and these are your offers? You should be in at several t14s and be close to a full ride at ND/UCLA. Did you apply late or do you have C&F issues?thebobs1987 wrote:Retaking on Monday. I don't know when enough is enough though. I see retake as the answer on here so many times (and obviously I heeded that advice), but when do you just cut your losses and go? I guess I would have to hire a tutor, etc. and go for 173+ to go with my 4.0 (LSDAS 4.09), because I have self-studied up to this point (PowerScore Bibles, LSAT Trainer, and all PT's 29-70) and yet I still have maxed out at a 169 (twice).
If not, you should think about reapplying next year.
No, no, no -- my apologies for any confusion! My LSAT was not a 169 when I took last June, that is what I have been PTing at during my studying this time around. Fluctuating anywhere from 165-169.
transferror wrote:You need to sit out. There's no reason to pay sticker at any non-HYS with a 4.0. You might be able to ED NU with your current numbers, and improving on the LSAT by a few points puts you on Harvard's radar and big $$ throughout the T14.
Yes. It's worth it for the shot at YS, probably the only schools worth paying sticker for. And if you hit 170+ you are looking at many t14 full ride offers.That is why I am retaking on Monday. If I don't make the jump through self-studying, should I get a tutor? Take a class?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login