GW vs. Wake Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
wakeundergrad

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:16 pm

GW vs. Wake

Post by wakeundergrad » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:21 pm

.
Last edited by wakeundergrad on Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

timbs4339

Gold
Posts: 2777
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm

Re: GW vs. Wake

Post by timbs4339 » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:34 pm

You need to adjust GWs employment rate by 20% to account for the school funded jobs (pay = $20,000/year, that is not a joke). Do that and Wake actually has a higher employment score than GW. GW is definitely not worth the 200K you will be paying with accrued interest, origination fees, and tuition hikes. Wake is great if you want to work in NC, and at the price you're paying I'd take that.

What are your stats/where do you want to work/what do you want to do?

http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=gw
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wake

wakeundergrad

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:16 pm

Re: GW vs. Wake

Post by wakeundergrad » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:59 pm

.
Last edited by wakeundergrad on Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

timbs4339

Gold
Posts: 2777
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm

Re: GW vs. Wake

Post by timbs4339 » Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:26 pm

wakeundergrad wrote:165 and 3.5.

I'd like to work in the Mid Atlantic in either government (Washington DC) or in private practice working with government.

Wake does have a great history in placing students in Washington DC from what I have heard and read.

It placed about 5% last year. Of course so did Columbia and Cornell, so I have no idea what % of the class tried.

Fed gov is a really, really long shot. It also sounds like you want biglaw. I would absolutely not go to GW at that price (if you are relying on PSLF, think again since there's a proposal on the table from the Democrats to slash benefits for the program and god knows what the Republicans will do when they get back into office).

User avatar
AT9

Gold
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: GW vs. Wake

Post by AT9 » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:59 pm

Between these two at these prices, I'd take Wake. But if you want to work in DC, I probably wouldn't do either. I'd retake to go to GW for cheap or T14, particularly Georgetown.

If you won't do that, I'd have to think that if you got big money at Wake, you'd get decent money from Richmond or W&M. Those would be better for DC or at least Northern VA/DC metro. I got 38/year at Wake and 1/2 off at W&M.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


wakeundergrad

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:16 pm

Re: GW vs. Wake

Post by wakeundergrad » Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:52 pm

.
Last edited by wakeundergrad on Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:09 am, edited 2 times in total.

FamilyLawEsq

Bronze
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:30 pm

Re: GW vs. Wake

Post by FamilyLawEsq » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:23 am

[quote="wakeundergrad"]165 and 3.5.

I'd like to work in the Mid Atlantic in either government (Washington DC) or in private practice working with
Last edited by FamilyLawEsq on Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
androstan

Gold
Posts: 4633
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am

Re: GW vs. Wake

Post by androstan » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:16 am

If you're neither IP nor DC-committed, there are generally better options than GW.

You seem like URM? I definitely suggest retake. Break 170 and you will have some serious options.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”