GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$ Forum
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:59 am
GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
I want to live/work in either DC, NY, or Boston. Applied to Emory on a whim, not too keen on ATL. Open to doing biglaw, but I'd like to be able to make a choice between financial ruin or biglaw if possible. None of these schools place more than 35% in biglaw regardless.
Cost per year before living expenses (NY is more $ than DC, which is more than Boston, etc...)
GW-40k
WM-16K but I have to work in library, keep 3.0
BU-45K (no word on merit scholarship yet)
Fordham-50K (same)
Cardozo- Full Ride
Emory-18k
Cost per year before living expenses (NY is more $ than DC, which is more than Boston, etc...)
GW-40k
WM-16K but I have to work in library, keep 3.0
BU-45K (no word on merit scholarship yet)
Fordham-50K (same)
Cardozo- Full Ride
Emory-18k
- Winston1984
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
Stats? How many times have you taken the LSAT? Total COA for each school?
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:59 am
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
Took LSAT once, got a 165, 3.5 GPA from sub-Ivy undergrad university. Not a URM.
Total COL would probably be another 20-25k per year for all of them except for WM, which is more like 15k.
Total COL would probably be another 20-25k per year for all of them except for WM, which is more like 15k.
- Law Sauce
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:21 pm
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
W&M is probably the best option, but man that is a hard road.
Waiting and retaking could result in a much easier road. It is almost certainly worth it to try.
Waiting and retaking could result in a much easier road. It is almost certainly worth it to try.
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
Retake, but WM if you must.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 5:37 pm
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
Retake, but GW between those choices.
- Law Sauce
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:21 pm
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
Really GW at $235k+ over W&M at $95k+?HP5450 wrote:Retake, but GW between those choices.
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
That would be a life ruining choice.Law Sauce wrote:Really GW at $235k+ over W&M at $95k+?HP5450 wrote:Retake, but GW between those choices.
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
Retake for 5-10 more points and reapply next cycle. Among the current options, I'd personally go with Emory, but I do see your reservations about Atlanta.
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:55 pm
Re: GW$ v. WM$$ v. BU v. Fordham v. Cardozo$$$ v. Emory$
Retake>>>>WM>Emory>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rest not worth going at those prices