Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
androstan

Gold
Posts: 4633
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am

Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by androstan » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:48 pm

http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/arti ... ject-title

(Not sure if this belongs here or not, mods feel free to move if you think it's appropriate)

User avatar
androstan

Gold
Posts: 4633
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by androstan » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:18 am

The only way to break the US News stranglehold is for everyone, especially 0L's, to recognize the rankings for what they are, bullshit.

lawschooltransparency.com has done far, far more in the area of helping 0L's choose which school to attend than US News will ever do. Look there, 0L's.

User avatar
cotiger

Gold
Posts: 1648
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by cotiger » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:42 am

Some solid pro-Berkeley trolling in there.

User avatar
Mauve.Dino

Bronze
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:55 am

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by Mauve.Dino » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:46 am


04102014

Gold
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by 04102014 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:48 am

cotiger wrote:Some solid pro-Berkeley trolling in there.
I was all like :?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by rpupkin » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:41 pm

cotiger wrote:Some solid pro-Berkeley trolling in there.
Huh? The author is a GW professor. And all he was suggesting was that Berkeley is a peer of Penn and Michigan. That seems pretty uncontroversial.

User avatar
cotiger

Gold
Posts: 1648
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by cotiger » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:13 pm

rpupkin wrote:
cotiger wrote:Some solid pro-Berkeley trolling in there.
Huh? The author is a GW professor. And all he was suggesting was that Berkeley is a peer of Penn and Michigan. That seems pretty uncontroversial.
"That means that on a scorecard, out of roughly 200 schools, 20 schools should receive a 5. Should the scorecards of anyone who doesn't rank Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Columbia, Chicago, NYU, or Berkeley at this level be taken seriously at all?"

Simultaneously true and trollish. Well done.

User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by jenesaislaw » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:14 pm

GW Professor wrote:These cries are deftly answered with a response that is typically a variant of the following: "We'll look into this. We are always looking to improve our ranking formula." Not much changes, though. The formula is tweaked a little bit, but the changes are never dramatic.
Umm, U.S. News has changed their rankings formula dramatically twice in the past four years. U.S. News responds to suggestions not just criticisms. I can personally attest to this because I have sit downs with their entire methodology research team from time to time.

Overall, this piece more of the same woe is me crap that I'm increasingly frustrated by. I understand the pressures law school admins are under. It's ridiculous. But then you turn around and ask them to provide meaningful information so that people don't have to rely on U.S. News and it's like pulling teeth. Finally, GW released their NALP report for 2012. Finally! And all it took was seeing that Georgetown did it, which was a response to Columbia, which was a response to a phone call after many attempts.

TLS is a great example of what happens when you provide people meaningful information. They use that information instead of the rankings. Hell, just look at OP's first response -- a link to LST.

/kvetching

User avatar
rayiner

Platinum
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by rayiner » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:21 pm

cotiger wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
cotiger wrote:Some solid pro-Berkeley trolling in there.
Huh? The author is a GW professor. And all he was suggesting was that Berkeley is a peer of Penn and Michigan. That seems pretty uncontroversial.
"That means that on a scorecard, out of roughly 200 schools, 20 schools should receive a 5. Should the scorecards of anyone who doesn't rank Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Columbia, Chicago, NYU, or Berkeley at this level be taken seriously at all?"

Simultaneously true and trollish. Well done.
This is great, and something I have never thought of. I can't think of any sensible distribution of just 5 scores that is consistent with the top 10 or so schools not all having very nearly a 5 overall score. The fact that some of the listed schools have scores below 4.5 (i.e. more 4's than 5's) means that people used up 40% of the whole scoring range just on the top 10 or so out of 200 schools.

User avatar
androstan

Gold
Posts: 4633
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am

Re: Why U.S. News Will Never Improve its Ranking System

Post by androstan » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:23 pm

rayiner wrote:
cotiger wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
cotiger wrote:Some solid pro-Berkeley trolling in there.
Huh? The author is a GW professor. And all he was suggesting was that Berkeley is a peer of Penn and Michigan. That seems pretty uncontroversial.
"That means that on a scorecard, out of roughly 200 schools, 20 schools should receive a 5. Should the scorecards of anyone who doesn't rank Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Columbia, Chicago, NYU, or Berkeley at this level be taken seriously at all?"

Simultaneously true and trollish. Well done.
This is great, and something I have never thought of. I can't think of any sensible distribution of just 5 scores that is consistent with the top 10 or so schools not all having very nearly a 5 overall score. The fact that some of the listed schools have scores below 4.5 (i.e. more 4's than 5's) means that people used up 40% of the whole scoring range just on the top 10 or so out of 200 schools.
ayup

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”