UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
RaiderRowing2010

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 4:37 pm

UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by RaiderRowing2010 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:56 pm

Hi all. I have finally heard back from all of the schools to which I have applied and now I eagerly enter my decision-making phase. I am a first generation lawyer in my family so I don't really have anyone who I can candidly ask about my choices. In choosing a law school I am looking for basically the best return on my investment with considerable weight also being given to the quality of life for students.

UCLA is my number one and the highest rank school to which I have been accepted. I was born and raised in North Jersey and I am currently a senior at Rutgers University. That being said, I love this place. I want to, without a doubt, return to the NYC area to practice law but I think the chance to get away and experience something new for 3 years would be an invaluable life experience.

But weighing over all the pushes to go to UCLA are two $10,000 a year scholarships to Notre Dame and Fordham (stipulations are only that I remain in good academic standing) and a FULL RIDE to Seton Hall Law. I should note that Seton Hall Law is almost exactly 15 minutes from my front-door back home.

I will be paying for law school by myself with loans taken out in my name.

Thoughts on the cost of UCLA being worth the experience? Also chances of moving back to the east coast for work? Or are Seton Hall and Fordham really more viable options than I'm giving them credit for?

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by BigZuck » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:01 pm

I don't think UCLA at sticker is worth it if you're from CA and want to work in CA, let alone take the degree back east. UCLA is a non-starter in my opinion. Ditto Notre Dame and Fordham. Way too expensive.

Seton Hall is the only defensible choice, and that's if you have modest career goals (working at a small firm, district attorney or public defender's office, things like that). What do you want to do with your law degree?

User avatar
180kickflip

Bronze
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by 180kickflip » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:13 pm

I'd say Seton Hall 100%

But If you're not willing to just write the others off like that, I'd start by looking at how easy/hard it would be to get in state residency at UCLA. If you can get it relatively easy after the 1st year, then the total COA may be even to or cheaper than Fordham + Notre Dame (especially if you'd have to get your own place in NYC to attend Fordham).

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by BigZuck » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:16 pm

180kickflip wrote:I'd say Seton Hall 100%

But If you're not willing to just write the others off like that, I'd start by looking at how easy/hard it would be to get in state residency at UCLA. If you can get it relatively easy after the 1st year, then the total COA may be even to or cheaper than Fordham + Notre Dame (especially if you'd have to get your own place in NYC to attend Fordham).
Instate tuition at UCLA is a joke, it's 45K a year and rising every year, plus you have to pay west LA cost of living.

kyle010723

Silver
Posts: 1177
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by kyle010723 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:28 pm

RaiderRowing2010 wrote:UCLA is my number one and the highest rank school to which I have been accepted. I was born and raised in North Jersey and I am currently a senior at Rutgers University. That being said, I love this place. I want to, without a doubt, return to the NYC area to practice law but I think the chance to get away and experience something new for 3 years would be an invaluable life experience.
Based on this paragraph, UCLA should not be one of your options.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


hopeful 0L

New
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:15 am

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by hopeful 0L » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:37 pm

To those arguing in favor of Seton Hall. What sort of COA is justifiable for the upgrade to a ND/USC type of school? Or to a back end T14 like Cornell or GULC?

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by BigZuck » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:52 pm

hopeful 0L wrote:To those arguing in favor of Seton Hall. What sort of COA is justifiable for the upgrade to a ND/USC type of school? Or to a back end T14 like Cornell or GULC?
Impossible to answer in a vacuum, totally dependent on career goals and personal factors.

If someone just wanted to be an ADA in Trenton, I would have to think that going to a school like Notre Dame would be more of a hinderance/downgrade than anything. It's too far from the home base to successfully network and hustle as much as one should to get that kind of job.

User avatar
180kickflip

Bronze
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by 180kickflip » Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:17 pm

hopeful 0L wrote:To those arguing in favor of Seton Hall. What sort of COA is justifiable for the upgrade to a ND/USC type of school? Or to a back end T14 like Cornell or GULC?

I can't imagine many situations where near sticker at USC/UCLA would make sense for someone 100% committed to a career on the east coast. That's especially true when you already have a full ride to a school in the market you actually want to work, that allows to live at home. It's more about the region than the COA.

If you had Cornell as an option, that would change everything to me. I'd be willing to pay 150k to go to Cornell if my end goal was NYC biglaw.

If you had GULC, were committed to government or PI, and ok with D.C., I'd probably pay 150k to go there as well.

All depends on the goals and how committed you are to that region.

User avatar
aboutmydaylight

Silver
Posts: 580
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by aboutmydaylight » Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:24 pm

UCLA at sticker + Westwood COL seems like a terrible choice for east coast employment.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Sgt Brody.

Bronze
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:40 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by Sgt Brody. » Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:32 pm

BigZuck wrote:I don't think UCLA at sticker is worth it if you're from CA and want to work in CA, let alone take the degree back east. UCLA is a non-starter in my opinion. Ditto Notre Dame and Fordham. Way too expensive.

Seton Hall is the only defensible choice, and that's if you have modest career goals (working at a small firm, district attorney or public defender's office, things like that). What do you want to do with your law degree?
Big Zuck, if you want to work in Southern California, would u still say that UCLA is not worth at sticker?

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by BigZuck » Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:40 pm

Sgt Brody. wrote:
BigZuck wrote:I don't think UCLA at sticker is worth it if you're from CA and want to work in CA, let alone take the degree back east. UCLA is a non-starter in my opinion. Ditto Notre Dame and Fordham. Way too expensive.

Seton Hall is the only defensible choice, and that's if you have modest career goals (working at a small firm, district attorney or public defender's office, things like that). What do you want to do with your law degree?
Big Zuck, if you want to work in Southern California, would u still say that UCLA is not worth at sticker?
Me personally? Yes. I mean, UCLA doesn't give you a particularly great shot at a high paying job. PSLF is great if you can get it but that's really tough, plus UCLA's LRAP isn't particularly good from what I understand. I think 100K for UCLA is defensible. But 230K+? No, that's way too risky.

User avatar
Sgt Brody.

Bronze
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:40 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by Sgt Brody. » Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:51 pm

BigZuck wrote:
Sgt Brody. wrote:
BigZuck wrote:I don't think UCLA at sticker is worth it if you're from CA and want to work in CA, let alone take the degree back east. UCLA is a non-starter in my opinion. Ditto Notre Dame and Fordham. Way too expensive.

Seton Hall is the only defensible choice, and that's if you have modest career goals (working at a small firm, district attorney or public defender's office, things like that). What do you want to do with your law degree?
Big Zuck, if you want to work in Southern California, would u still say that UCLA is not worth at sticker?
Me personally? Yes. I mean, UCLA doesn't give you a particularly great shot at a high paying job. PSLF is great if you can get it but that's really tough, plus UCLA's LRAP isn't particularly good from what I understand. I think 100K for UCLA is defensible. But 230K+? No, that's way too risky.
fair enough, Im applying next cycle, and Im planning to apply ED to UCLA, as I go to under grad in southern california, and want to settle down here after law school as well. I totally understand the risks of ed- getting less scholly money in return of a very slight bump in admissions. I can understand how some people may not need that slight bump, but for me I would really like that and need that. So, at best I am looking at getting only 30 thousand in need based aid (ucla gives out good need based aid). And so my total cost of attendance would be somewhere form 175-180k. I get that it might be a little on your higher side, and frankly it is a little high for me too, but the way I look at it, I want and need to be in southern cali, and UCLA is the best law school in the region, and gives me the best shot at any job I want here in this region (preferably a big firm job). So, yes even though UCLA may not be as good as T14, wont you say my reasoning is ok as it is the best school in the region, and it has the best employment numbers in the region I want to work too.
Last edited by Sgt Brody. on Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hitchensian

Bronze
Posts: 208
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:34 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by Hitchensian » Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:51 pm

Notre Dame or Seton Hall, given the circumstances you've outlined.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by Tiago Splitter » Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:25 pm

Sgt Brody. wrote: fair enough, Im applying next cycle, and Im planning to apply ED to UCLA, as I go to under grad in southern california, and want to settle down here after law school as well. I totally understand the risks of ed- getting less scholly money in return of a very slight bump in admissions. I can understand how some people may not need that slight bump, but for me I would really like that and need that. So, at best I am looking at getting only 30 thousand in need based aid (ucla gives out good need based aid). And so my total cost of attendance would be somewhere form 175-180k. I get that it might be a little on your higher side, and frankly it is a little high for me too, but the way I look at it, I want and need to be in southern cali, and UCLA is the best law school in the region, and gives me the best shot at any job I want here in this region (preferably a big firm job). So, yes even though UCLA may not be as good as T14, wont you say my reasoning is ok as it is the best school in the region, and it has the best employment numbers in the region I want to work too.
First of all, don't count on any need based aid. If you think you'll qualify for a lot of need based aid, you shouldn't be applying ED given what need based aid says about your financial situation. But just as importantly, USC exists. Retake the LSAT and put yourself in a position to be courted by both USC and UCLA. With apps dropping the way they are, you will get into one of them at a far cheaper price than what you'd be looking at from UCLA ED, especially since you can apply broadly and use other scholarships for leverage.

OP I see from your post history that you are under review at Duke. It sounds like you might need to let this play out a little longer. Hopefully you applied to a lot more places.

Big Dog

Silver
Posts: 1205
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by Big Dog » Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:30 pm

Im planning to apply ED to UCLA,
Really bad idea for someone who wants to do immigration law (which is generally very low scale); most work accomplished by paralegals.

LafayetteJeff

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:13 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by LafayetteJeff » Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:54 pm

Try to get another 10k out of Fordham, that could change your equation IMO.

UCLA has enough stature to get you back into your desired market, but it is risky to put down that much money.

Seton is low risk/reward, and less stress, which you can't pay for. Did you try Rutgers, out of curiosity?

User avatar
ndirish2010

Gold
Posts: 2985
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm

Re: UCLA v. Notre Dame v. Fordham v. Seton Hall

Post by ndirish2010 » Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:11 pm

Retake for more money at Fordham or Cornell.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”