Battle of the Washingtons! Forum
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Battle of the Washingtons!
I got into UW, GW and W&L.
UW=in state waiting on scholarship info
GW=10k a year scholly
W&L=30k a year scholly
My goals are open, I would like to end up in Seattle if possible and I am interested in business law (econ UG) but am I stupid to turn down GW? (I got in elsewhere but these are the top candidates. I am also waiting on others, UCLA, USC, ASU and Stanford).
UW=in state waiting on scholarship info
GW=10k a year scholly
W&L=30k a year scholly
My goals are open, I would like to end up in Seattle if possible and I am interested in business law (econ UG) but am I stupid to turn down GW? (I got in elsewhere but these are the top candidates. I am also waiting on others, UCLA, USC, ASU and Stanford).
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
GW isnt going to mean shit in Washington State. Most schools are regional. Unless UW is close to free. Retake and get a better scholly or go to T14.
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
As soon as you stated your interest in working in Seattle, it made me say UW here. Unless you somehow had to pay sticker, then W & L becomes a possibility. What would you say COA is at UW supposing you worst-case had to pay in-state sticker, and what is COA at W&L? Additionally, where are your ties? Are you already from the Seattle area or Washington? If local, that makes the case for UW even better.Icecold62 wrote:I got into UW, GW and W&L.
UW=in state waiting on scholarship info
GW=10k a year scholly
W&L=30k a year scholly
My goals are open, I would like to end up in Seattle if possible and I am interested in business law (econ UG) but am I stupid to turn down GW? (I got in elsewhere but these are the top candidates. I am also waiting on others, UCLA, USC, ASU and Stanford).
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
wife has a good job, I am from Seattle, living in the area.... all good things. COA at W&L... I don't even know, 13k tuitionx3 plus life..... at UW worst case right now is 29k a year tuition plus 20k for COL, but the job would negate the COL at least.
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
Lol. I asked if you were from there and I acknowledged previously that you have in-state tuition. Either way, the answer is more emphatically UW given that you're already from Seattle and should save on COA. It's not close IMO. With even a 5k per year scholarship, that's 72K total COA if negating COL expenses and adding in the scholarship.Icecold62 wrote:wife has a good job, I am from Seattle, living in the area.... all good things. COA at W&L... I don't even know, 13k tuitionx3 plus life..... at UW worst case right now is 29k a year tuition plus 20k for COL, but the job would negate the COL at least.
That said, what's your highest LSAT? If the opportunity is there to retake, you should.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
Diagnostic was 159 and my first test got me a 165. I studied for about 2 months? gpa is technically a 3.3, I doubt the LSAT is my biggest issue.
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
Wait a cycle -> retake -> get big scholarship from UW or get into a few T-14s -> profit.Icecold62 wrote:Diagnostic was 159 and my first test got me a 165. I studied for about 2 months? gpa is technically a 3.3, I doubt the LSAT is my biggest issue.
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
tiltedwindmill wrote:Wait a cycle -> retake -> get big scholarship from UW or get into a few T-14s -> profit.Icecold62 wrote:Diagnostic was 159 and my first test got me a 165. I studied for about 2 months? gpa is technically a 3.3, I doubt the LSAT is my biggest issue.
Assuming I don't get a big scholly now?
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
You won't.Icecold62 wrote:tiltedwindmill wrote:Wait a cycle -> retake -> get big scholarship from UW or get into a few T-14s -> profit.Icecold62 wrote:Diagnostic was 159 and my first test got me a 165. I studied for about 2 months? gpa is technically a 3.3, I doubt the LSAT is my biggest issue.
Assuming I don't get a big scholly now?
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
scoobers wrote:You won't.Icecold62 wrote:tiltedwindmill wrote:Wait a cycle -> retake -> get big scholarship from UW or get into a few T-14s -> profit.Icecold62 wrote:Diagnostic was 159 and my first test got me a 165. I studied for about 2 months? gpa is technically a 3.3, I doubt the LSAT is my biggest issue.
Assuming I don't get a big scholly now?



-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
In state at UDub is 55K not including living expenses. I wouldn't do that for a 2/3 shot at any legal employment. I've heard the Seattle and greater PNW market is INSANELY hard to get. YHS natives compete for some of the very few SAs with big firms. Retake the LSAT.
And you're not stupid to turn down GW. You would be stupid to accept GW.
And you're not stupid to turn down GW. You would be stupid to accept GW.
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
Mal Reynolds wrote:In state at UDub is 55K not including living expenses. I wouldn't do that for a 2/3 shot at any legal employment. I've heard the Seattle and greater PNW market is INSANELY hard to get. YHS natives compete for some of the very few SAs with big firms. Retake the LSAT.
And you're not stupid to turn down GW. You would be stupid to accept GW.
UW is 29k instate... Where did you get 55?
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
scoobers wrote:You won't.Icecold62 wrote:tiltedwindmill wrote:Wait a cycle -> retake -> get big scholarship from UW or get into a few T-14s -> profit.Icecold62 wrote:Diagnostic was 159 and my first test got me a 165. I studied for about 2 months? gpa is technically a 3.3, I doubt the LSAT is my biggest issue.
Assuming I don't get a big scholly now?
Why not? I got large scholarships from similar and higher ranked schools. Why not something decent from UW?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
From what I've read, UW is stingy as F#$%. They don't really hand out large schollies. It's like the anti-WUSTL (another Washington!).Icecold62 wrote:
Why not? I got large scholarships from similar and higher ranked schools. Why not something decent from UW?
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
Well, definitly don't pay 40k/yr tuition for gw. That's 200k+ COA including interest. That would prolly ruin your life financially.
Since you only studied 2 months for your 165, retake in June is tcr
Since you only studied 2 months for your 165, retake in June is tcr
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:41 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
Do some networking. Hear opinions from Seattle-area professionals, if that's where you want to end up. I lived in Seattle over the summer and spoke to a bunch of attorneys (mostly personal injury, which isn't what I want, but I digress), and learned a LOT about how one goes about breaking into the Seattle market. You can PM me if you want more details.
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
UW is stingy. There is SOME evidence that this might change, but I actually think that it is not likely to happen until next year. http://www.law.washington.edu/macdonaldgift/ManoftheHour wrote:From what I've read, UW is stingy as F#$%. They don't really hand out large schollies. It's like the anti-WUSTL (another Washington!).Icecold62 wrote:
Why not? I got large scholarships from similar and higher ranked schools. Why not something decent from UW?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
He should probably retake but if COA is 72k or around there (given a small 15k total scholarship and COL covered by wife), and he's not biglaw or bust, then UW is a plausible move.Mal Reynolds wrote:In state at UDub is 55K not including living expenses. I wouldn't do that for a 2/3 shot at any legal employment. I've heard the Seattle and greater PNW market is INSANELY hard to get. YHS natives compete for some of the very few SAs with big firms. Retake the LSAT.
And you're not stupid to turn down GW. You would be stupid to accept GW.
- mist4bison
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:17 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
.
Last edited by mist4bison on Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
When you say a CA school, you're talking about Stanford, right?mist4bison wrote:If your ultimate goal is Seattle, you'll be much better off going to a Washington school. Or at least a CA school. From what I know, even SU would be better than GW in the Seattle job market. I'd wait to see what kind of $$$ you get from UW. Or retake.
However, do know that the Seattle legal market is super difficult to get into. I know a number of attorneys that graduated t14, SU, and UW that work at the AG office and make $50k. Most people I know making any kind of decent money in Seattle went to WA schools.
Also, GO DAWGS!!!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
Well I feel that as I am not big law or bust, waiting to see the $$ is my obvious first step, then if it is good enough, it seems like a good call at UW. I know retake is the popular option, but aside from not wanting to I have doubts on my ability to improve. Add in the cost of waiting another year and it makes an extra... say 20k a year into a loss as I just missed out on a year of actual wages. Opportunity cost slaps me in the face.
Finally, on this page we tend to speak of averages and medians. They are the best estimates we can come by, true. But frankly if you are aiming for median then this is the wrong field anyways. That's my thought process at least.
Finally, on this page we tend to speak of averages and medians. They are the best estimates we can come by, true. But frankly if you are aiming for median then this is the wrong field anyways. That's my thought process at least.
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
Also, lots of good points, thanks for helping me talk myself out of GW
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
i think a retake and t14 with local ties to Seattle would probably be the best bet.
- yossarian
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Battle of the Washingtons!
0L. Similar GPA and I can sympathize with the feeling retaking. If you had a 3.6+ it seems like a no brainer, but with that 3.3, you feel like you're already not competitive. I think a thread for low GPA retake wisdom would be interesting. As HYSCCN are basically out for low GPA nonURM, a retake might get you lower t14 sticker(ish) or extra scholly at regional (amount would vary widely depending on regional).Icecold62 wrote:Well I feel that as I am not big law or bust, waiting to see the $$ is my obvious first step, then if it is good enough, it seems like a good call at UW. I know retake is the popular option, but aside from not wanting to I have doubts on my ability to improve. Add in the cost of waiting another year and it makes an extra... say 20k a year into a loss as I just missed out on a year of actual wages. Opportunity cost slaps me in the face.
Finally, on this page we tend to speak of averages and medians. They are the best estimates we can come by, true. But frankly if you are aiming for median then this is the wrong field anyways. That's my thought process at least.
I'm not saying retake is not the best option. In your case, it 99% is because you only studied 2 months. But, I would research UW's scholarship distribution. Find out what you would need, see if it is realistically attainable, determine how much that would save you off COA, compare that to the opportunity cost and make the decision that way. You obviously also have to factor in what you are doing now, whether that will allow you to study hard enough, etc.
FWIW, with my similar GPA, I'm outperforming my #s this cycle (in terms of scholarships). So, I'm going to wait to see if I get a t14 nod (unlikely), and then see where $$ ends up at my strong regionals. While I'm doing this, I'm going to rediagnose my LSAT next weekend (been 2 years since my last test), see what I realistically think I could get with a retake. In April, when I'm sitting on final offers, I'll then decide whether I'll go this cycle. If not, I'm going to have to switch jobs to an hourly position to give me the time to study. (Not anywhere near ideal, will cost me ~15k). I'll then have to weigh this against extra $$ or the chance at a t14 my projected LSAT retake will give me. It's a complicated decision.
My point in all this is retake is TCR. Retaking is hugely valuable, and people are helping you when they share this. But, the nuance behind the decision is important to consider.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login