Maybe it is the best law school I can get in.

http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wlW&L '12 wrote:•49.2% of graduates were known to be employed in long-term, full-time legal jobs.
•60.8% graduates were employed in long-term jobs.
•61.5% graduates were employed in full-time jobs.
I know it's job prospects is not good. if one school employment is bad, does it mean it may have better learning environment or better teachers since it has the same ranking with other schools.Nova wrote:If you can get into W&L, you can get into many schools with better job prospects
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wlW&L '12 wrote:•49.2% of graduates were known to be employed in long-term, full-time legal jobs.
•60.8% graduates were employed in long-term jobs.
•61.5% graduates were employed in full-time jobs.
USNWRankings are meaningless
Ignore them
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
They're relatively meaningless for your purposes because the ranking factors you do/should care about are your employment outcomes, while the USNW rankings consider a number of other, tangential inputs. These other inputs should be immaterial to you, at least up until the point you're splitting hairs between two schools with similar employment outlooks, cost, etc. If you want a quiet town near a beautiful school, you can move to and work in any number of college towns without going a couple hundred thousand dollars in debt to maybe have a job. If you want J.D.-required professional employment that can meet a satisfactory standard of living while paying law school debt, then value employment outcomes on LST over USNW rank.jianggannan wrote:I know it's job prospects is not good. if one school employment is bad, does it mean it may have better learning environment or better teachers since it has the same ranking with other schools.Nova wrote:If you can get into W&L, you can get into many schools with better job prospects
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wlW&L '12 wrote:•49.2% of graduates were known to be employed in long-term, full-time legal jobs.
•60.8% graduates were employed in long-term jobs.
•61.5% graduates were employed in full-time jobs.
USNWRankings are meaningless
Ignore them
Why do you think USnews rankings are meaningless?
In all seriousness, if this represents your English fluency, you should not go to any law school under any circumstances.jianggannan wrote:It is a very quite town and the school is beautiful. The job prospect is not good though.
Maybe it is the best law school I can get in.
That's it everyone. Mods, shut the board down. Professor Campos and Tamanaha can get back to writing about the relevance of 18th Century riparian rights in Tahoe County to modern day claims under the Securities Exhange Act, LST can take those Skadden associate jobs waiting for them. Someone you know got a good job.Summerz wrote:Plus, if the people I know are any indication on how the legal market is doing, things are looking up (especially compared to ’11)
Why would you think that the outcome of one person is representative of the outcomes from that school?Summerz wrote:FWIW: The only person I know who attended W&L liked it a lot. She graduated in ’11 (a tough year I hear) and ended up working at a respectable DC firm with a very good salary and bonuses to boot.
I am one of those who believe rankings are instrumental, with that noted, W&L seems to be doing just fine. Plus, if the people I know are any indication on how the legal market is doing, things are looking up (especially compared to ’11)
Yeah just didn't want to be the one who said itSBL wrote:In all seriousness, if this represents your English fluency, you should not go to any law school under any circumstances.jianggannan wrote:It is a very quite town and the school is beautiful. The job prospect is not good though.
Maybe it is the best law school I can get in.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Look, I don't care if it's supreme court justices teaching on the beaches of Waikiki, if I don't get to be a lawyer at the end, then what's the point? If your goal is education for education's sake, study something like philosophy or literature at an undergrad institution for much cheaper. I'm not saying education is not valuable for it's own sake, and you'll probably get a good one at W&L; I'm saying that med school is supposed to make you a doctor, business school is supposed to make you a businessman, and law school is supposed to make you a lawyer.jianggannan wrote:I know it's job prospects is not good. if one school employment is bad, does it mean it may have better learning environment or better teachers since it has the same ranking with other schools.Nova wrote:If you can get into W&L, you can get into many schools with better job prospects
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wlW&L '12 wrote:•49.2% of graduates were known to be employed in long-term, full-time legal jobs.
•60.8% graduates were employed in long-term jobs.
•61.5% graduates were employed in full-time jobs.
USNWRankings are meaningless
Ignore them
Why do you think USnews rankings are meaningless?
Ok now I know the op wasn't just casually typed. Do not go to law school anywhere until you improve your English. Seriously. You will get absolutely slaughtered grade wise.jianggannan wrote:I know it's job prospects is not good. if one school employment is bad, does it mean it may have better learning environment or better teachers since it has the same ranking with other schools.Nova wrote:If you can get into W&L, you can get into many schools with better job prospects
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wlW&L '12 wrote:•49.2% of graduates were known to be employed in long-term, full-time legal jobs.
•60.8% graduates were employed in long-term jobs.
•61.5% graduates were employed in full-time jobs.
USNWRankings are meaningless
Ignore them
Why do you think USnews rankings are meaningless?
This is a surprisingly common part of the scam. Roberts teaches a class in Malta funded by NELS and Kennedy and Kagan teach in Salzburg, Austria courtesy of McGeorge SOL.isuperserial wrote:Look, I don't care if it's supreme court justices teaching on the beaches of Waikiki,
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
(tries to justify his own decisions. the glove fits.)john1990 wrote:Did they give you the 40k/yr?
if the glove fits you must attendstillwater wrote:(tries to justify his own decisions. the glove fits.)john1990 wrote:Did they give you the 40k/yr?
No. No one must go to law schooljohn1990 wrote:if the glove fits you must attendstillwater wrote:(tries to justify his own decisions. the glove fits.)john1990 wrote:Did they give you the 40k/yr?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I miss the banhammer.Steveloblaw wrote:No. No one must go to law schooljohn1990 wrote:if the glove fits you must attendstillwater wrote:(tries to justify his own decisions. the glove fits.)john1990 wrote:Did they give you the 40k/yr?
start with is/arehyj wrote:Improve your English!
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login