Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw Forum
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:00 pm
Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
TX is the only market I'm really interested in. Do any of these schools offer a notable advantage in the TX market and how do they compare with HYS and UT?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Are you from Texas?
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:00 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Yes, very strong ties to Dallas, Houston and Austin
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
For the Class of 2012, Penn sent 2.5% of its graduates to TX, Chicago 7%, and Columbia 2.2% (and for Columbia, this includes people who may have gone to AR, LA, or OK).
You can find this on the schools' employment pages.
https://www.law.upenn.edu/careers/emplo ... istics.php
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/prospective/employmentdata
http://web.law.columbia.edu/careers/emp ... nformation
IIRC, H is around 7%, though you should look up their and YS+UT's (new grouping?
) data yourself to be sure. Googling "x law employment data" usually does the trick.
Penn and Columbia predictably send most of their grads to NYC, with Chicago and H more spread out, which increases the TX %age. I'm not sure how much harder it would actually be to get TX from, say, Columbia v Chicago. The small TX %age at the former is probably largely self-selection.
One thing I can say with some confidence is that your chances will depend in large part on your ties to TX and your ability to sell your desire to live and work there indefinitely.
You can find this on the schools' employment pages.
https://www.law.upenn.edu/careers/emplo ... istics.php
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/prospective/employmentdata
http://web.law.columbia.edu/careers/emp ... nformation
IIRC, H is around 7%, though you should look up their and YS+UT's (new grouping?

Penn and Columbia predictably send most of their grads to NYC, with Chicago and H more spread out, which increases the TX %age. I'm not sure how much harder it would actually be to get TX from, say, Columbia v Chicago. The small TX %age at the former is probably largely self-selection.
One thing I can say with some confidence is that your chances will depend in large part on your ties to TX and your ability to sell your desire to live and work there indefinitely.
Last edited by Jaqen on Wed Sep 04, 2013 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
From a top school like Columbia or Chicago, I would say it's probably more self-selection on the lower percentage of Texas Biglaw.
I don't think you'd have much trouble as long as you have strong ties to the area.
I don't think you'd have much trouble as long as you have strong ties to the area.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
All are inferior to YHS and significantly superior to UT in placement ability.cruxisfalcon wrote:Do any of these schools offer a notable advantage in the TX market and how do they compare with HYS and UT?
+1kalvano wrote:From a top school like Columbia or Chicago, I would say it's probably more self-selection on the lower percentage of Texas Biglaw.
As an aside, I don't think getting Houston BigLaw requires particularly "strong" ties of people from top schools. Ties help, of course, there are many much more parochial markets.I don't think you'd have much trouble as long as you have strong ties to the area.
My perspective might be a bit skewed, but I just watched more than one of my classmates target Texas and secure several Houston offers without ever having set foot in the state outside of an airport.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
True, it's Austin and Dallas that are much more heavily into ties. But who would want to live in Houston anyway?
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Houston's the only part of Texas I'd even consider living in.kalvano wrote:True, it's Austin and Dallas that are much more heavily into ties. But who would want to live in Houston anyway?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Houston is a vile swamp full of trollops, nee'r-do-wells, charlatans, and thieves. You are welcome to it and good day to you sir.
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
kalvano wrote:Houston is a vile swamp full of trollops, nee'r-do-wells, charlatans, and thieves. You are welcome to it and good day to you sir.

How difficult is it to get Houston biglaw compared to the other major markets? Everyone says NYC is easiest, DC is really tough, Chicago was owned by the recession. Where does Houston fit in?
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
I went to CLS. There are a lot of firms (TX firms or national firms with TX offices) that come to the on-campus interview program. Problem is that their summer class sizes are tiny. You'll be competing for a handful of callbacks for each firm- maybe even one or two.
I have friends with extensive Texas ties (never lived anywhere else except for law school) who struck out in Texas but got offers in New York.
I have friends with extensive Texas ties (never lived anywhere else except for law school) who struck out in Texas but got offers in New York.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Houston's economy is doing pretty well, actually. There are a lot of postings on SMU's Symplicity for Houston firms, some large, some small. Of all the Texas markets, it's probably the easiest to get into.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
kalvano wrote:Houston is a vile swamp full of trollops, nee'r-do-wells, charlatans, and thieves. You are welcome to it and good day to you sir.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Ohiobumpkin
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:50 am
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Go to the one that has the lowest COA and enjoy your Texas big law job in three-four years.
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
While this is generally true in a vacuum, it depends on the firm, even if we are talking Texas biglaw. Many Texas biglaw firms don't even recruit outside of Texas. The sheer proximity of UT to these firms gives Texas grads a leg up at these firms. Now if you go to, say Columbia, you would need to hustle your butt off just make your presence known to these firms. They aren't going to show up to your OCI or any of your off campus job fairs for that matter. And if they like your ties, then I'm sure you would not have a problem getting that particular biglaw job.All are inferior to YHS and significantly superior to UT in placement ability.
But is a huge misconception on this site that all of Texas biglaw hires uniformly. There is a huge difference in the hiring practices of Fulbright, Jackson Walker, and Brown McCarrol. The first has a much more national presence. The other two do not. But they are all Texas biglaw. The Texas biglaw firms that do not have a national presence don't hire outside of UT much. I don't think it's because they view UT law kids as being superior to other top school kids. It's that UT is much closer in proximity. So it's easier from which to recruit.
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
It's my home so I am biased, but I agree with this sentiment. The nice parts of Houston are much nicer than the nicer parts of Austin, not including natural scenery, of course.jselson wrote:Houston's the only part of Texas I'd even consider living in.kalvano wrote:True, it's Austin and Dallas that are much more heavily into ties. But who would want to live in Houston anyway?
I never visited a place in Austin when I lived there that was as nice any of the nicest parts of Houston.
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
I also find it curious that people on this site give other top schools credit for self selection, but don't consider the self selection component when it comes to UT Law grads getting Texas Biglaw. I am not saying that UT has superior placement power over any top national school in Texas. I am saying that when it comes to self selection, anecdotal evidence is the only kind of evidence that can shed light on it. And Texas's low COA allows for some UT law grads to self select out of the big three in Texas biglaw to smaller Texas biglaw firms that are really just Texas based firms that pay at or near market. I had a classmate turn down an offer at Baker Botts for working at a much smaller firm. Both offers where in Austin. If she lived in Chicago, she would not have been able to do that. And that firm that she chose doesn't recruit outside of Texas or at any other school in Texas other than UT, at least back then it didn't. And choosing these smaller firms that pay at or near market happens with regularity among Texas grads.
If it is a regional company, the UT Law brand is incredibly great. It's Texas we're talking about. I don't think people here understand just how self absorbed Texas is. Texas is so self absorbed to the point of annoyance. The national/international law firms based out of Texas think very much like all of the other big law firms around the country. But once you get more regional, even with regional firms that pay at or near market, its all about Texas.
I've lived here all of my life. I am just telling you how it is.
If it is a regional company, the UT Law brand is incredibly great. It's Texas we're talking about. I don't think people here understand just how self absorbed Texas is. Texas is so self absorbed to the point of annoyance. The national/international law firms based out of Texas think very much like all of the other big law firms around the country. But once you get more regional, even with regional firms that pay at or near market, its all about Texas.
I've lived here all of my life. I am just telling you how it is.
Last edited by utlaw2007 on Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Greenandgold
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
utlaw2007 wrote:I also find it curious that people on this site give other top schools credit for self selection, but don't consider the self selection component when it comes to UT Law grads getting Texas Biglaw. I am not saying that UT has superior placement power over any top national school in Texas. I am saying that when it comes to self selection, anecdotal evidence is the only kind of evidence that can shed light on it. And Texas's low COA allows for some UT law grads to self select out of the big three in Texas biglaw to smaller Texas biglaw firms that are really just Texas based firms that pay at or near market. I had a classmate turn down an offer at Baker Botts for working at a much smaller firm. Both offers where in Austin. If she lived in Chicago, she would not have been able to do that. And that firm that she chose, doesn't recruit outside of Texas or at any other school in Texas other than UT, at least back then it didn't. And choosing these smaller firms that pay at or near market happens with regularity among Texas grads.
If it is a regional company, the UT Law brand is incredibly great. It's Texas we're talking about. I don't think people here understand just how self absorbed Texas is. Texas is so self absorbed to the point of annoyance. The national/international law firms based out of Texas think very much like all of the other big law firms around the country. But once you get more regional, even with regional firms that pay at or near market, its all about Texas.
I've lived here all of my life. I am just telling you how it is.
Wtf are you talking about?
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Ordinarily, I would answer your question. But your disrespectful tone and needless hostility for something I said is uncalled for so I am not going to answer. Perhaps, if you address me in a more respectful tone, I'll answer your question.Greenandgold wrote:utlaw2007 wrote:I also find it curious that people on this site give other top schools credit for self selection, but don't consider the self selection component when it comes to UT Law grads getting Texas Biglaw. I am not saying that UT has superior placement power over any top national school in Texas. I am saying that when it comes to self selection, anecdotal evidence is the only kind of evidence that can shed light on it. And Texas's low COA allows for some UT law grads to self select out of the big three in Texas biglaw to smaller Texas biglaw firms that are really just Texas based firms that pay at or near market. I had a classmate turn down an offer at Baker Botts for working at a much smaller firm. Both offers where in Austin. If she lived in Chicago, she would not have been able to do that. And that firm that she chose, doesn't recruit outside of Texas or at any other school in Texas other than UT, at least back then it didn't. And choosing these smaller firms that pay at or near market happens with regularity among Texas grads.
If it is a regional company, the UT Law brand is incredibly great. It's Texas we're talking about. I don't think people here understand just how self absorbed Texas is. Texas is so self absorbed to the point of annoyance. The national/international law firms based out of Texas think very much like all of the other big law firms around the country. But once you get more regional, even with regional firms that pay at or near market, its all about Texas.
I've lived here all of my life. I am just telling you how it is.
Wtf are you talking about?
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
When you address me or anyone for that matter, you need to watch your tone.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
(Posts rambly wall of text that makes little to no sense)
(Tone trolls)
(Tone trolls)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
I guess everyone has something to say when they sit behind a computer screen.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Do you only get easily butthurt behind a computer screen or is it an around-the-clock thing
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
That was very funny. Have you ever thought about doing stand up? You should try it. I think you would be good.IAFG wrote:Do you only get easily butthurt behind a computer screen or is it an around-the-clock thing
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Penn vs Chicago vs Columbia for Texas Biglaw
Trollollolutlaw2007 wrote:That was very funny. Have you ever thought about doing stand up? You should try it. I think you would be good.IAFG wrote:Do you only get easily butthurt behind a computer screen or is it an around-the-clock thing
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login