. Forum
- abduction12
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:16 pm
- zozin
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
Why the rush?abduction12 wrote:I have a 164 LSAT and will definitely be attending law school this fall.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:16 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
1. Retake
2. Retake
3. Retake.
...
9001. UIUC
...
....
900000000000000000000001. BC
2. Retake
3. Retake.
...
9001. UIUC
...
....
900000000000000000000001. BC
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
The ranking drop is not going to have any effect on UIUCs relative rank in the Chicago market for employment purposes. Hiring partners aren't going to boycott the school because the admission dean was a scumbag.abduction12 wrote:I've been planning to attend UIUC and am from Chicago and wouldn't mind working there post-graduation. I just got accepted to BC off the waitlist and have to make a decision by next week. While UIUC seems like the obvious option, I have serious concerns about their dropped ranking and how the school's reputation could suffer as a result. While I'm still leaning towards UIUC, I don't want to take the cheaper option and then end up without a job knowing that another school could've given me a better chance at finding full-time legal employment. What do you all think?
I have a 164 LSAT and will definitely be attending law school this fall.
That being said, retake.
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
RETAKE -- you shouldn't even be thinking about attending law school this fall if these are your only options, as those schools aren't worth those prices. What's your GPA?abduction12 wrote:I've been planning to attend UIUC and am from Chicago and wouldn't mind working there post-graduation. I just got accepted to BC off the waitlist and have to make a decision by next week. While UIUC seems like the obvious option, I have serious concerns about their dropped ranking and how the school's reputation could suffer as a result. While I'm still leaning towards UIUC, I don't want to take the cheaper option and then end up without a job knowing that another school could've given me a better chance at finding full-time legal employment. What do you all think?
I have a 164 LSAT and will definitely be attending law school this fall.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- abduction12
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:16 pm
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 3:27 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
75% scholly is definitely worth it if you plan on working in Chicago. Illinois has solid connections in that market.abduction12 wrote:Not so much a rush, I'm just not confident that I could do significantly better on the LSAT, and my GPA is less than stellar; makes me think I couldn't get into a T-14 even if I scored higher.zozin wrote:Why the rush?abduction12 wrote:I have a 164 LSAT and will definitely be attending law school this fall.
And PRGrad - You don't think UIUC w/ a 75% scholarship is worth it?
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
No, I don't. What's your total COA?abduction12 wrote:Not so much a rush, I'm just not confident that I could do significantly better on the LSAT, and my GPA is less than stellar; makes me think I couldn't get into a T-14 even if I scored higher.zozin wrote:Why the rush?abduction12 wrote:I have a 164 LSAT and will definitely be attending law school this fall.
And PRGrad - You don't think UIUC w/ a 75% scholarship is worth it?
- abduction12
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:16 pm
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
That's not that bad if all you want to do is gun for Chicago and keep expectations realistic.abduction12 wrote:
GPA is 3.0, out of undergrad 4 years with teaching experience.
Total COA will be about $50,000, though tuition is all I'm going to be taking loans out for.
How many times have you taken the LSAT and how did you prep?
- abduction12
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:16 pm
-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
If you want biglaw, don't go to UIUC.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:31 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
Not everybody can attend the T-14, so if you want to work in the Midwest (and Chicago in particular), then Illinois is a solid school and, at that price, is a far better option than BC. Congrats and enjoy law school!
- zozin
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
Hmm, where'd you get the $50K from? UIUC estimated COA is $30K/year after you discount the 75% tuition.abduction12 wrote:Total COA will be about $50,000, though tuition is all I'm going to be taking loans out for.
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
Family help? It's possible that the dude lives close by the school and can live at home. He did say he was from the area.zozin wrote:Hmm, where'd you get the $50K from? UIUC estimated COA is $30K/year after you discount the 75% tuition.abduction12 wrote:Total COA will be about $50,000, though tuition is all I'm going to be taking loans out for.
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
If it were only a ranking drop, firms wouldn't care. But the ranking drop is bringing about a dramatic change in quality of the incoming class. It looks like Illinois' LSAT median this year will drop down to 159, if LSN is in any way accurate.timbs4339 wrote: The ranking drop is not going to have any effect on UIUCs relative rank in the Chicago market for employment purposes. Hiring partners aren't going to boycott the school because the admission dean was a scumbag.
That being said, retake.
They are essentially recruiting a T2 entering class these days. That has to give legal recruiters pause, especially with so many other mid-T1 schools nearby (ND, Wisconsin, Iowa, WUSTL, Indiana). Sure, some will still be loyal because of the in-state/alumni ties, but try explaining to a client why you are billing top dollar for associates from a T2 class.
It's amazing how fast things are falling apart there. They're dropping like a rock, and I'm not sure the worst is over yet. I can't believe I met Dean Pless and almost went there. I thought it might be possible that the side-effects from that scandal would be quickly forgotten, but it's having a huge effect.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
If you want a shot at biglaw, I would take BC. You won't have a shot from UIUC.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
It's a bit premature to claim that it's going to fall apart without better information. If student quality is on a terminal decline, yes, eventually the schools placement will crash and burn. But it will take a pretty long time for firms to pick up on it and internalize it. You can see the opposite of this going on at schools that shoot up in selectivity and ranking without really doing better at job placement. Though, I bet it's easier to lose cache than gain it.JCougar wrote:If it were only a ranking drop, firms wouldn't care. But the ranking drop is bringing about a dramatic change in quality of the incoming class. It looks like Illinois' LSAT median this year will drop down to 159, if LSN is in any way accurate.timbs4339 wrote: The ranking drop is not going to have any effect on UIUCs relative rank in the Chicago market for employment purposes. Hiring partners aren't going to boycott the school because the admission dean was a scumbag.
That being said, retake.
They are essentially recruiting a T2 entering class these days. That has to give legal recruiters pause, especially with so many other mid-T1 schools nearby (ND, Wisconsin, Iowa, WUSTL, Indiana). Sure, some will still be loyal because of the in-state/alumni ties, but try explaining to a client why you are billing top dollar for associates from a T2 class.
It's amazing how fast things are falling apart there. They're dropping like a rock, and I'm not sure the worst is over yet. I can't believe I met Dean Pless and almost went there. I thought it might be possible that the side-effects from that scandal would be quickly forgotten, but it's having a huge effect.
Illinois as a university is respected in Chicago. An admissions scandal isn't going to change it this fast. And clients aren't screaming SECOND PAGE, SECOND PAGE. Nobody is giving Jenner Block shit for having associates from Illinois. He'll I bet 25% of partners, clients and the children of either, went to Illinois for UG or law school.
I'm not saying it won't happen, but you cannot tell, now, that it will.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
These schools were 3% different at NLJ250 placement last year. Literally next to each other on the list. You are done here.Informative wrote:If you want a shot at biglaw, I would take BC. You won't have a shot from UIUC.
-
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
Please change your username. Your posts are consistently worthless.Informative wrote:If you want a shot at biglaw, I would take BC. You won't have a shot from UIUC.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
BC simply doesn't make any sense here. Go to UIUC or retake.
- Snowboarder1588
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:55 am
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
50k total coa is a good deal if you want to stay in IL
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
If its really 50K total with interest and everything and you're cool with working at a small firm in IL then go for it.
If you want a shot at big law or the like then retake and enjoy Northwestern
If you want a shot at big law or the like then retake and enjoy Northwestern
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: UIUC (75% In-State) vs. BC (Sticker)
I have to agree with this. This is an unprecedented situation and any speculation at this point is just that. Will legal employers penalize Illinois? Maybe? Then again, the legion of Illinois alumni at Chicago firms might also rally around their shared brand to go out of their way to hire from Illinois grads.Desert Fox wrote:It's a bit premature to claim that it's going to fall apart without better information. If student quality is on a terminal decline, yes, eventually the schools placement will crash and burn. But it will take a pretty long time for firms to pick up on it and internalize it. You can see the opposite of this going on at schools that shoot up in selectivity and ranking without really doing better at job placement. Though, I bet it's easier to lose cache than gain it.JCougar wrote:If it were only a ranking drop, firms wouldn't care. But the ranking drop is bringing about a dramatic change in quality of the incoming class. It looks like Illinois' LSAT median this year will drop down to 159, if LSN is in any way accurate.timbs4339 wrote: The ranking drop is not going to have any effect on UIUCs relative rank in the Chicago market for employment purposes. Hiring partners aren't going to boycott the school because the admission dean was a scumbag.
That being said, retake.
They are essentially recruiting a T2 entering class these days. That has to give legal recruiters pause, especially with so many other mid-T1 schools nearby (ND, Wisconsin, Iowa, WUSTL, Indiana). Sure, some will still be loyal because of the in-state/alumni ties, but try explaining to a client why you are billing top dollar for associates from a T2 class.
It's amazing how fast things are falling apart there. They're dropping like a rock, and I'm not sure the worst is over yet. I can't believe I met Dean Pless and almost went there. I thought it might be possible that the side-effects from that scandal would be quickly forgotten, but it's having a huge effect.
Illinois as a university is respected in Chicago. An admissions scandal isn't going to change it this fast. And clients aren't screaming SECOND PAGE, SECOND PAGE. Nobody is giving Jenner Block shit for having associates from Illinois. He'll I bet 25% of partners, clients and the children of either, went to Illinois for UG or law school.
I'm not saying it won't happen, but you cannot tell, now, that it will.
If you want to avoid Illinois because of uncertainty, I think that's fair. But that really points to your level of risk aversion. A risk taker might see this as a prime time to buy low in attending a school they wouldn't have access to in ordinary times.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login