Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
MattRenick

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:26 pm

Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by MattRenick » Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:25 pm

I want to study environmental and energy law, hopefully work either at a boutique environmental law firm or in government (US Attorney's office, DOJ, EPA, etc). Eventually want to end up in politics. Columbia undergrad, originally from California, no idea where I want to live in the future.

Deposit is already in at BC but Tulane just upped the scholarship. COA now: BC ~ 60k a year, Tulane ~ 20k

Will be financed mostly by my family with some loans by myself (especially if I choose BC).

I would appreciate any and all feedback ASAP!

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:33 pm

Can you retake?

MattRenick

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:26 pm

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by MattRenick » Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:40 pm

I've taken twice, scored roughly the same each time (163). I know the mantra here is retake to go to T14, but I want to be at an urban campus with strong environmental law. I know I'm not going to get into Harvard/Columbia/NYU, and I did not like GULC when I visited. I don't know anything about Chicago.

Thoughts on the current options would be much appreciated!

User avatar
jselson

Platinum
Posts: 6337
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by jselson » Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:42 pm

Don't go to Tulane.

dkb17xzx

Bronze
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:25 pm

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by dkb17xzx » Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:43 pm

Most people will tell you to retake. BC isn't worth sticker and Tulane most likely won't get you where you wanna go.

Have you tried negotiating with BC?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


MattRenick

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:26 pm

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by MattRenick » Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:46 pm

Yea I tried using scholarships from W&M (half-tuition) and UW, plus Cardozo (80%). They weren't having it.

Haven't asked them with this new number from Tulane, but I doubt they'll care.

User avatar
WokeUpInACar

Platinum
Posts: 5542
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:11 pm

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by WokeUpInACar » Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:11 pm

MattRenick wrote:I've taken twice, scored roughly the same each time (163). I know the mantra here is retake to go to T14, but I want to be at an urban campus with strong environmental law. I know I'm not going to get into Harvard/Columbia/NYU, and I did not like GULC when I visited. I don't know anything about Chicago.

Thoughts on the current options would be much appreciated!
You need to retake. 3-4 more points would save you 50k+ at BC.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by BigZuck » Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:19 pm

Definitely retake. Your ties scream CA or NY, you need to go to a school that will get you to one of those two places

dkb17xzx

Bronze
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:25 pm

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by dkb17xzx » Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:43 pm

MattRenick wrote:Yea I tried using scholarships from W&M (half-tuition) and UW, plus Cardozo (80%). They weren't having it.

Haven't asked them with this new number from Tulane, but I doubt they'll care.

retaking is your best bet.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
cinephile

Gold
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by cinephile » Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:58 pm

Your chances at an environmental law job are the same no matter where you go, so it's completely useless to look at a school's specialities.

You should be aiming for the cheapest possible school if you're not going to a T14. So if Tulane is only 20k a year (including COL) for you, then I'd take Tulane. 60k isn't terrible and you can bounce back if you don't find work in law.

Ti Malice

Gold
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am

Re: Tulane (37k a year) vs. BC (sticker) -- environmental law

Post by Ti Malice » Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:13 pm

Paying that kind of money for BC would be sheer madness. Re-evaluating your approach to studying for the LSAT and then retaking is the obvious correct answer here, but if you won't do that, then Tulane is the only option here. Don't fixate on utterly meaningless specialty rankings, either.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”