UW vs. Cardozo Forum
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:02 pm
- Winston1984
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Answer all of these questions, so people can give you advice.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=206299
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=206299
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:02 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
think I covered them all now
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Retake or don't go (especially since you've only take it once). You could hit the 170s and try for NU.
USNWR specialty rankings are a flame. Neither Cardozo nor UW have particularly good employment prospects, and you should NOT be taking out that much in loan $$ for them.
USNWR specialty rankings are a flame. Neither Cardozo nor UW have particularly good employment prospects, and you should NOT be taking out that much in loan $$ for them.
- Winston1984
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
This. It sucks what happened to you your sophomore year because that really killed your gpa. NU is splitter friendly and a good addendum should work in your case. Oh, and I hope you are healthy and well now!Bronck wrote:Retake or don't go (especially since you've only take it once). You could hit the 170s and try for NU.
USNWR specialty rankings are a flame. Neither Cardozo nor UW have particularly good employment prospects, and you should NOT be taking out that much in loan $$ for them.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:02 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Is UW really that bad? My impression was that it's highly regarded in the PNW seeing as there's practically no other law schools worth mentioning.Bronck wrote:Retake or don't go (especially since you've only take it once). You could hit the 170s and try for NU.
USNWR specialty rankings are a flame. Neither Cardozo nor UW have particularly good employment prospects, and you should NOT be taking out that much in loan $$ for them.
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
It's certainly the best law school in the PNW but there are very few legal jobs in the PNW. Check out the LST stats. 1/3 of students don't even get a legal job, and only 10% get a job that can reasonably pay off the kind of debt you're looking at.redtalun wrote:Is UW really that bad? My impression was that it's highly regarded in the PNW seeing as there's practically no other law schools worth mentioning.Bronck wrote:Retake or don't go (especially since you've only take it once). You could hit the 170s and try for NU.
USNWR specialty rankings are a flame. Neither Cardozo nor UW have particularly good employment prospects, and you should NOT be taking out that much in loan $$ for them.
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:49 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
UW is not bad if you aren't looking for biglaw, but that CoA is much too high and you cannot count on it being portable to the east coast.
- Winston1984
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
It is a great option for in-state students with a nice scholarship who don't have biglaw aspirations. I wouldn't attend unless your COA was cut in half.
- Kalinda
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:41 am
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Exactly. UW is the best in the PNW, but people are competing with T14 natives who want to work in their home area. It would be a hard degree to transfer to the East coast. What type of work do you do? Do you work for Boeing? I believe they used to have one of the tuition reimbursement programs in the country, but did scale back a bit. Is your current job able to help finance school?Bronck wrote:It's certainly the best law school in the PNW but there are very few legal jobs in the PNW. Check out the LST stats. 1/3 of students don't even get a legal job, and only 10% get a job that can reasonably pay off the kind of debt you're looking at.redtalun wrote:Is UW really that bad? My impression was that it's highly regarded in the PNW seeing as there's practically no other law schools worth mentioning.Bronck wrote:Retake or don't go (especially since you've only take it once). You could hit the 170s and try for NU.
USNWR specialty rankings are a flame. Neither Cardozo nor UW have particularly good employment prospects, and you should NOT be taking out that much in loan $$ for them.
Definitely take the LSAT again, with a high score and a great addendum, NU isn't unrealistic.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
150k is pushing it even at a top 14 law school, IMO. Don't go and please retake.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Considering the job prospects I wouldn't blow $140k of savings on those
See lawschooltransparency.com
See lawschooltransparency.com
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Only go to UW if you want to practice in the pacific northwest. But caution, plenty of Berkeley grads to compete with in Seattle too. Im curious if U Minnesota has any reach out there since theres basically nothing inbetween them... (Not saying they would I honestly dont know)
Im assuming its your parents savings going into COA. I dont know why people have been talking about loans and debt, my understanding is you will have none. Considering the limits of your GPA, going to UW and working locally with no debt doesnt seem too bad.. Seattle is really nice. If you retake and kill it, you COULD yield a T14 WL-> acceptance, but I still think its unlikely (even for NU 3.0 is basically the lowest floor). T20 definitely though but then your not far from UW anyway.
Im assuming its your parents savings going into COA. I dont know why people have been talking about loans and debt, my understanding is you will have none. Considering the limits of your GPA, going to UW and working locally with no debt doesnt seem too bad.. Seattle is really nice. If you retake and kill it, you COULD yield a T14 WL-> acceptance, but I still think its unlikely (even for NU 3.0 is basically the lowest floor). T20 definitely though but then your not far from UW anyway.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dr. Dre
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
jbagelboy wrote: But caution, plenty of Berkeley grads
what is it with your obsession over Berkeley Law? You're going to the WAY better school—Columbia. Get over Cal.
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:02 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
No, it would be my savingsjbagelboy wrote:Only go to UW if you want to practice in the pacific northwest. But caution, plenty of Berkeley grads to compete with in Seattle too. Im curious if U Minnesota has any reach out there since theres basically nothing inbetween them... (Not saying they would I honestly dont know)
Im assuming its your parents savings going into COA. I dont know why people have been talking about loans and debt, my understanding is you will have none. Considering the limits of your GPA, going to UW and working locally with no debt doesnt seem too bad.. Seattle is really nice. If you retake and kill it, you COULD yield a T14 WL-> acceptance, but I still think its unlikely (even for NU 3.0 is basically the lowest floor). T20 definitely though but then your not far from UW anyway.

I tend to believe that it's my GPA more than my LSAT that's hurting me. I even considered at one point to first get a MS EE degree (have BS already) before applying with the sole purpose of inflating my GPA (I'd re-take the LSATs as well). I dismissed this idea, because I felt I would be wasting 2 years of my life just to manicure my resume.
- FKASunny
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
They only count your undergraduate courses for GPA. I have a slightly worse GPA than you, but I have much better offers. It's your LSAT score holding you back.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Too expensive. Retake and reapply, or don't to go law school
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:33 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Retake, even with that GPA breaking 170 will get you into better schools and significantly more money at Cardozo.
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
You're better off taking your $140k savings to Vegas and betting it all on red or black. I strongly suggest you retake and shoot for more $$$.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 5:22 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
redtalun wrote:No, it would be my savingsjbagelboy wrote:Only go to UW if you want to practice in the pacific northwest. But caution, plenty of Berkeley grads to compete with in Seattle too. Im curious if U Minnesota has any reach out there since theres basically nothing inbetween them... (Not saying they would I honestly dont know)
Im assuming its your parents savings going into COA. I dont know why people have been talking about loans and debt, my understanding is you will have none. Considering the limits of your GPA, going to UW and working locally with no debt doesnt seem too bad.. Seattle is really nice. If you retake and kill it, you COULD yield a T14 WL-> acceptance, but I still think its unlikely (even for NU 3.0 is basically the lowest floor). T20 definitely though but then your not far from UW anyway.I'd graduate debt free, but will have exhausted the savings I've accumulated from working 5+ years as a software engineer.
I tend to believe that it's my GPA more than my LSAT that's hurting me. I even considered at one point to first get a MS EE degree (have BS already) before applying with the sole purpose of inflating my GPA (I'd re-take the LSATs as well). I dismissed this idea, because I felt I would be wasting 2 years of my life just to manicure my resume.
Don't gamble 5+ years of work experience and savings on these options. Yeah, your gpa isn't going to help you, but you can help yourself by retaking.
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:33 pm
Re: UW vs. Cardozo
Your GPA is set, graduate classes don't change your LSAC GPA. However getting over 170 on your LSAT would give you a huge boost as I noted in my first response. If your WE is good Northwestern is in play, ED at UVA is an option, WUSTL, GW, a lot more doors will open, and even the places you are in now will offer more money.redtalun wrote:No, it would be my savingsjbagelboy wrote:Only go to UW if you want to practice in the pacific northwest. But caution, plenty of Berkeley grads to compete with in Seattle too. Im curious if U Minnesota has any reach out there since theres basically nothing inbetween them... (Not saying they would I honestly dont know)
Im assuming its your parents savings going into COA. I dont know why people have been talking about loans and debt, my understanding is you will have none. Considering the limits of your GPA, going to UW and working locally with no debt doesnt seem too bad.. Seattle is really nice. If you retake and kill it, you COULD yield a T14 WL-> acceptance, but I still think its unlikely (even for NU 3.0 is basically the lowest floor). T20 definitely though but then your not far from UW anyway.I'd graduate debt free, but will have exhausted the savings I've accumulated from working 5+ years as a software engineer.
I tend to believe that it's my GPA more than my LSAT that's hurting me. I even considered at one point to first get a MS EE degree (have BS already) before applying with the sole purpose of inflating my GPA (I'd re-take the LSATs as well). I dismissed this idea, because I felt I would be wasting 2 years of my life just to manicure my resume.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login