Seton Hall v. Suffolk? Forum
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:39 pm
Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Editing this post so it contains less personal info.
Suffolk or Northeastern with full tuition/expenses paid for or Seton Hall with $25K?
Suffolk or Northeastern with full tuition/expenses paid for or Seton Hall with $25K?
Last edited by KLA07171 on Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:38 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Why do you want to go to Seton Hall so badly?
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:39 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Editing to contain less personal info
Last edited by KLA07171 on Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Avoid SH like the plague. It is a shitmill run by the valvoline dean himself.
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
How old are you?KLA07171 wrote:I have a rather unique situation. I'm from Boston and my family wants me to stay in Boston at all costs. They are willing to pay entirely for Suffolk if I go there - all tuition/expenses/rent for an apartment.. everything. If I go to Seton Hall they won't pay for any part of it. I received a $25,000 scholarship to Seton Hall, but will need to take out loans for the rest and to pay for rent/living expenses.
So the question is- to have debt, or not to have debt? Is it better to go to a T3 with no debt at all or to go somewhere like Seton Hall?
Also, I'm open to working in either the NY/NJ or Boston area, I don't have strong feelings towards either location.
Why are you parents dictating your decision?
Do they have a law firm they eventually want you to work for?
Seems like you might need to cut the umbilical cord, is this why you are contemplating paying for Seton Hall?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Boston College and Boston University are both significantly better investments than Suffolk. You need to retake the LSAT until you can get in to BC or BU and then let mommy and daddy pay for it. That's a bargain, IMO.
Don't waste your parent's money on Suffolk. Don't go to Seton Hall.
Don't waste your parent's money on Suffolk. Don't go to Seton Hall.
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:09 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Have you ever been to Newark? It's f'ing depressing. Even with $25k/year, you're still looking at over $20k in tuition plus COL, or about $120k total. If you had to decide between the two, take the free ride at Suffolk and never look back! Imagine not having to pay $1200+ in loans per month. You'll thank me later.
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:49 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Suffolk may be free for you, but you still have over a 60% chance of graduating without a full-time long-term legal job. Why won't your parents pay for Northeastern if they are paying for Suffolk? What are you looking to do with your law degree?
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
This. Retake and get into a school in Boston worth going to, i.e. a good deal from BU/BC. Suffolk would be a huge waste of your parents money.North wrote:Boston College and Boston University are both significantly better investments than Suffolk. You need to retake the LSAT until you can get in to BC or BU and then let mommy and daddy pay for it. That's a bargain, IMO.
Don't waste your parent's money on Suffolk. Don't go to Seton Hall.
If you insist on going, both of these schools have terrible job placement, so I suppose Suffolk for free with Boston ties beats Seton Hall. But take a look at the job data:
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=suffolk
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=setonhall
(ETA: SH's job data is inflated by their bizarre clerkship process in NJ, and because they have 30+ people working in firms of 2-10)
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Is no one else curious about the leash his parents have on him?KLA07171 wrote:I have a rather unique situation. I'm from Boston and my family wants me to stay in Boston at all costs. They are willing to pay entirely for Suffolk if I go there - all tuition/expenses/rent for an apartment.. everything. If I go to Seton Hall they won't pay for any part of it. I received a $25,000 scholarship to Seton Hall, but will need to take out loans for the rest and to pay for rent/living expenses.
So the question is- to have debt, or not to have debt? Is it better to go to a T3 with no debt at all or to go somewhere like Seton Hall?
Also, I'm open to working in either the NY/NJ or Boston area, I don't have strong feelings towards either location.
Seems like an odd ultimatum.
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
It would be really irresponsible to have your parents blow 200k on such a bad school. Retake and have them spend the money on a school that will leave you employed.
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
How wealthy are your parents? Even if they are wiling to pay, like the other posters are saying I wouldn't waste their money on Suffolk unless they are Bill Gates rich.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
At least they live in a city with a couple decent schools. It could be much worse if, say, they lived in Jacksonville.dirtrida2 wrote:Is no one else curious about the leash his parents have on him?
Seems like an odd ultimatum.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:39 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
I graduated from Northeastern with a 3.7 GPA got a 163 on the LSAT. I could retake, however I'm not confident that I could score high enough for BU. My practice tests were consistently in the low 160s.
Last edited by KLA07171 on Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:39 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
Yea you have no idea.
Last edited by KLA07171 on Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
What are you not telling us, your offers should be MUCH better given your numbers...KLA07171 wrote:dirtrida2 wrote:How old are you?KLA07171 wrote:I have a rather unique situation. I'm from Boston and my family wants me to stay in Boston at all costs. They are willing to pay entirely for Suffolk if I go there - all tuition/expenses/rent for an apartment.. everything. If I go to Seton Hall they won't pay for any part of it. I received a $25,000 scholarship to Seton Hall, but will need to take out loans for the rest and to pay for rent/living expenses.
So the question is- to have debt, or not to have debt? Is it better to go to a T3 with no debt at all or to go somewhere like Seton Hall?
Also, I'm open to working in either the NY/NJ or Boston area, I don't have strong feelings towards either location.
Why are you parents dictating your decision?
Do they have a law firm they eventually want you to work for?
Seems like you might need to cut the umbilical cord, is this why you are contemplating paying for Seton Hall?
I'm 23 and graduated last May. My parents are incredibly controlling so that absolutely adds to the appeal of SH because it would be a way to break away from them. They will pay for Northeastern as well, however (and I may be wrong with this) I've heard that Suffolk graduates have better opportunities in the Boston area because of their alumni network in the city.
I graduated from Northeastern with a 3.7 GPA got a 163 on the LSAT. I could retake, however I'm not confident that I could score high enough for BU. My practice tests were consistently in the low 160s.
Did you apply very late in the cycle - you should have been a shoe in at BC this year. Seton Hall should have also given you a full-ride.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:39 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
I did apply very late in the cycle. I submitted my applications in February, and my second recommender didn't get my recommendation in until March 1 so my apps were incomplete until then. I'm not sure if this contributed to my (lack of) offers.
Last edited by KLA07171 on Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
OP, how hard and for how long did you study? Be honest with yourself. If you put in the time and effort, I'm very confident you could get your score up 4-5 points (at least) and get into BU/BC. You owe it to yourself to retake and reapply early next cycle. TLS is full of success stories where people did exactly that, and the decision paid enormous dividends.
Study for 3 months, get all the resources you need, utilize our LSAT Forum, work hard, and go enjoy a better school. You can do better.
Study for 3 months, get all the resources you need, utilize our LSAT Forum, work hard, and go enjoy a better school. You can do better.
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
I did apply very late in the cycle. I submitted my applications in February, and my second recommender didn't get my recommendation in until March 1 so my apps were incomplete until then. I'm not sure if this contributed to my (lack of) offers.
It definitely did. Check LSN.
If you troll through the BC applicants thread you will see that they accepted non-URMs with lower LSATS and even lower GPAs.
You will definitely benefit from sitting out, retaking and applying EARLY. Even if you don't improve on your LSAT score (which I highly doubt) you will have a better cycle if you apply earlier.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:39 pm
Re: Seton Hall v. Suffolk?
dirtrida2 wrote:I did apply very late in the cycle. I submitted my applications in February, and my second recommender didn't get my recommendation in until March 1 so my apps were incomplete until then. I'm not sure if this contributed to my (lack of) offers.
It definitely did. Check LSN.
If you troll through the BC applicants thread you will see that they accepted non-URMs with lower LSATS and even lower GPAs.
You will definitely benefit from sitting out, retaking and applying EARLY. Even if you don't improve on your LSAT score (which I highly doubt) you will have a better cycle if you apply earlier.
Thanks everyone, I appreciate all the advice.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login