USC LAW-Is the Trojan Network Real? Forum

[mh013]

Is USC's alumni network actually as good as it is supposed to be?
Especially regarding OCI, would being in the Trojan Network actually help?

I'm currently deciding between USC and UCLA, and the strength of USC's network seems to be the only material advantage over UCLA. Equal scholarships at this point-should be able to hustle up to full rides at both. Also, does the fact that UCLA has higher average GPA/LSAT mean it might be harder to get good grades than at USC or does it really matter at all? Any thoughts?

Thanks for your input.

[052220151]

Is USC's alumni network actually as good as it is supposed to be?
Especially regarding OCI, would being in the Trojan Network actually help?

I'm currently deciding between USC and UCLA, and the strength of USC's network seems to be the only material advantage over UCLA. Equal scholarships at this point-should be able to hustle up to full rides at both. Also, does the fact that UCLA has higher average GPA/LSAT mean it might be harder to get good grades than at USC or does it really matter at all? Any thoughts?

Thanks for your input.

Go to USC, the football is better.

[bk1]

Is USC's alumni network actually as good as it is supposed to be?

No idea, but what I do know is that the strength of its alumni network is reflected in employment outcomes.

Also, does the fact that UCLA has higher average GPA/LSAT mean it might be harder to get good grades than at USC or does it really matter at all?

No, it doesn't matter.

Any thoughts?

These schools are peers. At equal costs, pick the one you personally prefer.

[enigmabk]

It is as real as the "bruin network". you don't want to get shot at USC, go to UCLA.

[BigZuck]

Would love to hear how you're gonna "hustle up" a full ride. Feel free to PM me if you don't want to share here.

[eav1277]

From my understanding (attend one of the two for undergrad), Trojan network is better in several fields. However, I don't think law is one of them (or at least the effect isn't as large).

Go to where you get better aid and feel more comfortable. Only other difference is UCLA has more students overall

[twinkletoes16]

Would love to hear how you're gonna "hustle up" a full ride. Feel free to PM me if you don't want to share here.

[twinkletoes16]

From my understanding (attend one of the two for undergrad), Trojan network is better in several fields. However, I don't think law is one of them (or at least the effect isn't as large).

Go to where you get better aid and feel more comfortable. Only other difference is UCLA has more students overall

where IS the effect palpable? film/tv?

[goden]

Would love to hear how you're gonna "hustle up" a full ride. Feel free to PM me if you don't want to share here.

[LittleTree]

Would love to hear how you're gonna "hustle up" a full ride. Feel free to PM me if you don't want to share here.

[megagnarley]

From my understanding (attend one of the two for undergrad), Trojan network is better in several fields. However, I don't think law is one of them (or at least the effect isn't as large).

Go to where you get better aid and feel more comfortable. Only other difference is UCLA has more students overall

where IS the effect palpable? film/tv?

Yes. And and in finance to a large extent. LA is full of Marshall educated execs.

Being a Trojan myself (undergrad), I would still say for law UCLA has a better grip on things in LA. While they are peers now, UCLA has been reputable for longer and just graduates more students.

That being said, being tied into the trojan family shouldn't be understated. It is unequivocally more tight knit the the UCLA grad network and I know a lot of people who went to both who would attest to the same.

[eav1277]

From my understanding (attend one of the two for undergrad), Trojan network is better in several fields. However, I don't think law is one of them (or at least the effect isn't as large).

Go to where you get better aid and feel more comfortable. Only other difference is UCLA has more students overall

where IS the effect palpable? film/tv?

Yes. And and in finance to a large extent. LA is full of Marshall educated execs.

Being a Trojan myself (undergrad), I would still say for law UCLA has a better grip on things in LA. While they are peers now, UCLA has been reputable for longer and just graduates more students.

That being said, being tied into the trojan family shouldn't be understated. It is unequivocally more tight knit the the UCLA grad network and I know a lot of people who went to both who would attest to the same.

I concur

[jselson]

Go to USC because the campus is easier to get around (not a fan of hilly areas), and you'll actually see real people around rather than just a bunch of yuppies (and yes, I did go to USC undergrad, why do you ask?).

[John_rizzy_rawls]

From my understanding (attend one of the two for undergrad), Trojan network is better in several fields. However, I don't think law is one of them (or at least the effect isn't as large).

Go to where you get better aid and feel more comfortable. Only other difference is UCLA has more students overall

where IS the effect palpable? film/tv?

Yes. And and in finance to a large extent. LA is full of Marshall educated execs.

Being a Trojan myself (undergrad), I would still say for law UCLA has a better grip on things in LA. While they are peers now, UCLA has been reputable for longer and just graduates more students.

That being said, being tied into the trojan family shouldn't be understated. It is unequivocally more tight knit the the UCLA grad network and I know a lot of people who went to both who would attest to the same.

I concur

[eav1277]

I'd say the campuses are equally easy to get around. You have to be realllly lazy to think UCLA's hills (not that hilly) are that bad.

If you want good football go to UCLA.

Good basketball. USC.


Joking about the sports, but it is interesting that UCLA beat USC in football this past year. And USC beat UCLA (at home) in bball this year.

For those of you unfamiliar with the rivalry (it's normally the other way around)

[jselson]

I'd say the campuses are equally easy to get around. You have to be realllly lazy to think UCLA's hills (not that hilly) are that bad.

This is a complete lie, and yes, I am very lazy.

[mh013]

Perhaps "hustling" a full ride was improper word choice.

What I have been doing is constantly hitting up the financial aid offices at a few different schools telling them about scholarship offers from other schools that are ranked better and telling them that I really want to attend their school but may not be able to attend due to finances (which is true).

It's worked really well so far, and I've received decent scholarships from some t-10s so I am confident that I can raise the bar again.

[marlborofillet]

Go to USC because the campus is easier to get around (not a fan of hilly areas), and you'll actually see real people around rather than just a bunch of yuppies (and yes, I did go to USC undergrad, why do you ask?).

I'm confused. Who are these real people you speak so fondly of? USC undergrads or the neighborhood folk?

It's worked really well so far, and I've received decent scholarships from some t-10s so I am confident that I can raise the bar again.

I thought USC had a no bargain policy. UCLA will definitely play ball, but be prepared to walk away.

[jselson]

Go to USC because the campus is easier to get around (not a fan of hilly areas), and you'll actually see real people around rather than just a bunch of yuppies (and yes, I did go to USC undergrad, why do you ask?).

I'm confused. Who are these real people you speak so fondly of? USC undergrads or the neighborhood folk?

The neighborhood. I absolutely love that area and find myself around there a heck of a lot more than Westwood when I visit LA. Especially the food: Langer's deli, Mama's hot tamales, King Taco, Chichen Itza, the pho shops in K-town: it's my favorite place to eat in LA, and it's not filled with a million people trying to show off how wealthy they are. East side > West side.

[marlborofillet]

Go to USC because the campus is easier to get around (not a fan of hilly areas), and you'll actually see real people around rather than just a bunch of yuppies (and yes, I did go to USC undergrad, why do you ask?).

I'm confused. Who are these real people you speak so fondly of? USC undergrads or the neighborhood folk?

The neighborhood. I absolutely love that area and find myself around there a heck of a lot more than Westwood when I visit LA. Especially the food: Langer's deli, Mama's hot tamales, King Taco, Chichen Itza, the pho shops in K-town: it's my favorite place to eat in LA, and it's not filled with a million people trying to show off how wealthy they are. East side > West side.

Fuck, breh. You've sold me. Sadly, I'm locked in Westwood. I wish there was good Mexican around here.

Still, I think LA in general is replete with folk flaunting wealth. It's disgusting, if lulz-worthy.

[John_rizzy_rawls]

^ SC and the surrounding area is so much more chill in this regard, despite the university of spoiled children moniker.

[JesusChrist]

Go to USC because the campus is easier to get around (not a fan of hilly areas), and you'll actually see real people around rather than just a bunch of yuppies (and yes, I did go to USC undergrad, why do you ask?).

I'm confused. Who are these real people you speak so fondly of? USC undergrads or the neighborhood folk?

The neighborhood. I absolutely love that area and find myself around there a heck of a lot more than Westwood when I visit LA. Especially the food: Langer's deli, Mama's hot tamales, King Taco, Chichen Itza, the pho shops in K-town: it's my favorite place to eat in LA, and it's not filled with a million people trying to show off how wealthy they are. East side > West side.

Translation:

Rich USC kids like to "slum it" and pretend they're boho-chic living in the hood.

[eav1277]

West side is definitely not greater than the east side. Different strokes for different folks.

But if you value safety...Westwood (UCLA) is definitely the better choice. You can walk around at 2-4 in the morning and be fairly safe. I personally wouldn't do it too often but I'd feel a lot safer in the UCLA neighborhood than USC neighborhood. Also, if you live in Westwood, you honestly don't need a car (or have to use it very often). Everything you need is within walking distance (Ralph's, Target, CVS, Trader Joes, Rite Aid, a variety of places to eat. Nightlife is a little lacking (two bars in the neighborhood).

Both are good schools.

Go to UCLA currently but considering USC for law school.

[eav1277]

Go to USC because the campus is easier to get around (not a fan of hilly areas), and you'll actually see real people around rather than just a bunch of yuppies (and yes, I did go to USC undergrad, why do you ask?).

I'm confused. Who are these real people you speak so fondly of? USC undergrads or the neighborhood folk?

The neighborhood. I absolutely love that area and find myself around there a heck of a lot more than Westwood when I visit LA. Especially the food: Langer's deli, Mama's hot tamales, King Taco, Chichen Itza, the pho shops in K-town: it's my favorite place to eat in LA, and it's not filled with a million people trying to show off how wealthy they are. East side > West side.

Fuck, breh. You've sold me. Sadly, I'm locked in Westwood. I wish there was good Mexican around here.

Still, I think LA in general is replete with folk flaunting wealth. It's disgusting, if lulz-worthy.

Sadly there isn't much Mexican food. I'm Mexican so I think I know what I'm talking about. They do have a somewhat expensive restaurant (cantina azul) and two mexican food attempts (Jose Bernsteins, Chipotle, and a smaller stand next to Fat Sals). You can venture into Santa Monica a few places (the place I liked a lot closed down and moved to Marina del Rey

[jselson]

Go to USC because the campus is easier to get around (not a fan of hilly areas), and you'll actually see real people around rather than just a bunch of yuppies (and yes, I did go to USC undergrad, why do you ask?).

I'm confused. Who are these real people you speak so fondly of? USC undergrads or the neighborhood folk?

The neighborhood. I absolutely love that area and find myself around there a heck of a lot more than Westwood when I visit LA. Especially the food: Langer's deli, Mama's hot tamales, King Taco, Chichen Itza, the pho shops in K-town: it's my favorite place to eat in LA, and it's not filled with a million people trying to show off how wealthy they are. East side > West side.

Translation:

Rich USC kids like to "slum it" and pretend they're boho-chic living in the hood.

Lol dude, I grew up in redneck Florida with a single mother and could only go to USC because of a full scholarship, but please continue to base your own worldview on stereotypes.