Does the 50% employed include the 20% school funded? If so, how in the hell is BU ranked higher than BC, which has employment of 68% and 10% in school funded positions?
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=bu
BU LST Report Forum
-
stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: BU LST Report
it doesn't. if you read the data, it says none of those ~20% are full-time, long-term positions.
-
BCLS
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:40 am
Re: BU LST Report
Ok thank the lord. That would be scary.stillwater wrote:it doesn't. if you read the data, it says none of those ~20% are full-time, long-term positions.
-
law2015
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:29 pm
Re: BU LST Report
It is only one year's worth of data and employment is only one metric looked at for rankings.
-
stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: BU LST Report
it's definitely still a school of haves and have-nots though.BCLS wrote:Ok thank the lord. That would be scary.stillwater wrote:it doesn't. if you read the data, it says none of those ~20% are full-time, long-term positions.
-
BCLS
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:40 am
Re: BU LST Report
Fair point. Arguably it should be the most important-- but it is what it is I suppose.law2015 wrote:It is only one year's worth of data and employment is only one metric looked at for rankings.
