Cardozo v. Brooklyn Forum
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:45 pm
Cardozo v. Brooklyn
Would love some input. I am very open to retaking my 164 LSAT, but would like to know if any of these options are reasonable if I attended this fall.
Brooklyn (41k/year)
Cardozo (35k/year)
Northeastern(30k/year)
Waitlisted at BC and Fordham
Also still waiting on $$ offer from Uconn.
Thanks guys
Brooklyn (41k/year)
Cardozo (35k/year)
Northeastern(30k/year)
Waitlisted at BC and Fordham
Also still waiting on $$ offer from Uconn.
Thanks guys
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Cardozo v. Brooklyn
nope, retake. you won't regret it because these options are not good.generaltoast wrote:Would love some input. I am very open to retaking my 164 LSAT, but would like to know if any of these options are reasonable if I attended this fall.
Brooklyn (41k/year)
Cardozo (35k/year)
Northeastern(30k/year)
Waitlisted at BC and Fordham
Also still waiting on $$ offer from Uconn.
Thanks guys
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: Cardozo v. Brooklyn
What law do you want to practice? I assume these numbers are total scholly awards. If so, what is the total debt you'll be taking out?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Cardozo v. Brooklyn
If you gotta pick one I'd take Brooklyn over Dozo since they're about equally bad and you're getting more money from Brooklyn. But none of those are good options.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Cardozo v. Brooklyn
If you think you can study harder and do better, retake the LSAT. If you get in off of either waitlist, you can consider going or you can reapply with a better LSAT next year.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Cardozo v. Brooklyn
Retake or don't go due to bad job prospects.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:51 pm
Re: Cardozo v. Brooklyn
jewornojew
BANNED FOR (POSSIBLY RACIST) TROLLING
BANNED FOR (POSSIBLY RACIST) TROLLING
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:45 pm
Re: Cardozo v. Brooklyn
Thanks for all the input guys, I appreciate it.
I would like to become an ADA. That said, I would not turn down a chance at biglaw should that (very unlikely) opportunity arise. Those scholarships are per year. Im assuming around 80k in loans?timbs4339 wrote:What law do you want to practice? I assume these numbers are total scholly awards. If so, what is the total debt you'll be taking out?
nojewcooldude87 wrote:jewornojew