Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property Forum
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:53 pm
Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
I know Whittier has an established program, but I can't seem to find any decent information about how IP is covered at Chapman. I spoke with someone there and they said it is included with their Entertainment Law focus, but they will have a professor call me and fill me in with any questions...
...until then though, I'd love to hear any personal experiences people have in regards to their IP focus at either school.
Thanks!
...until then though, I'd love to hear any personal experiences people have in regards to their IP focus at either school.
Thanks!
- drmguy
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:43 am
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
You should really take a look at the employment threads.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Retake or don't go.
Shitty employment outcomes.
Shitty employment outcomes.
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Whittier doesn't have any established programs in anything, they are a barely accredited shit hole. Do not pick a law school based on any specialty programs or "IP focus." Your sole concern should be job prospects and those are horrendous at both of these schools (but Whitter is the worse of the two). Retake the LSAT and reapply aiming for schools with a better likelihood of actually getting you a job in IP
-
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:40 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Your second statement isn't true. That is all.Ludovico Technique wrote:Whittier doesn't have any established programs in anything, they are a barely accredited shit hole. Do not pick a law school based on any specialty programs or "IP focus." Your sole concern should be job prospects and those are horrendous at both of these schools (but Whitter is the worse of the two). Retake the LSAT and reapply aiming for schools with a better likelihood of actually getting you a job in IP
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- drmguy
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:43 am
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
I will be more specific.
Absolutely no to Whittier.
As for Chapman, less than 40% of their graduates had long term legal jobs.
You will regret either of these choices for the rest of your life.
Absolutely no to Whittier.
As for Chapman, less than 40% of their graduates had long term legal jobs.
You will regret either of these choices for the rest of your life.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:53 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Lol, aw... c'mon, guys. I'm not too worried about employment prospects.
That aside, though, my brother went to Whittier Law school and is doing fantastic now at a small local firm (he recently became partner). I happen to like the people/campus there as well. Chapman is nice too.
In the end, Whittier offered me a bit of a scholarship, so that makes me more inclined to go that route, but Chapman is obviously a bit higher in the ranking... just not sure of what they have for people interested in technology/IP.
With that said -- I appreciate the reality check, but I really feel confident in myself.... enough to wager a decent chunk of change on it. So... aside from brimstone, any thoughts? =P
That aside, though, my brother went to Whittier Law school and is doing fantastic now at a small local firm (he recently became partner). I happen to like the people/campus there as well. Chapman is nice too.
In the end, Whittier offered me a bit of a scholarship, so that makes me more inclined to go that route, but Chapman is obviously a bit higher in the ranking... just not sure of what they have for people interested in technology/IP.
With that said -- I appreciate the reality check, but I really feel confident in myself.... enough to wager a decent chunk of change on it. So... aside from brimstone, any thoughts? =P
-
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:40 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Do you know any Chapman graduates? I do. The one that I know is doing just fine. Talked to him weeks ago. He graduated during the brunt of it and it was bad then, but he is doing fine now. He's now in a small practice that he established himself with other individuals.drmguy wrote:I will be more specific.
Absolutely no to Whittier.
As for Chapman, less than 40% of their graduates had long term legal jobs.
You will regret either of these choices for the rest of your life.
While not ideal, Chapman is better than Whittier.
- tedalbany
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Why? Do you have a guaranteed job? Or do you just have a weird debt and unemployment fetish?ssanders wrote:Lol, aw... c'mon, guys. I'm not too worried about employment prospects.
- tedalbany
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Stop giving advice. If even one person listens to you, that's one ruined life on your conscience.BearsGrl wrote:Do you know any Chapman graduates? I do. The one that I know is doing just fine. Talked to him weeks ago. He graduated during the brunt of it and it was bad then, but he is doing fine now. He's now in a small practice that he established himself with other individuals.drmguy wrote:I will be more specific.
Absolutely no to Whittier.
As for Chapman, less than 40% of their graduates had long term legal jobs.
You will regret either of these choices for the rest of your life.
While not ideal, Chapman is better than Whittier.
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Oh look more anecdotal evidence from BearsGrl! Wow you know ONE Chapman graduate who's doing fine. I guess OP should go there then because of those stats. 100% of graduates known by BearsGrl are now employed! I'm surprised that's not in Chapman's brochureBearsGrl wrote:Do you know any Chapman graduates? I do. The one that I know is doing just fine. Talked to him weeks ago. He graduated during the brunt of it and it was bad then, but he is doing fine now. He's now in a small practice that he established himself with other individuals.drmguy wrote:I will be more specific.
Absolutely no to Whittier.
As for Chapman, less than 40% of their graduates had long term legal jobs.
You will regret either of these choices for the rest of your life.
While not ideal, Chapman is better than Whittier.
-
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
ssanders wrote:Lol, aw... c'mon, guys. I'm not too worried about employment prospects.

- drmguy
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:43 am
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
You have to be kidding me.BearsGrl wrote:Do you know any Chapman graduates? I do. The one that I know is doing just fine. Talked to him weeks ago. He graduated during the brunt of it and it was bad then, but he is doing fine now. He's now in a small practice that he established himself with other individuals.drmguy wrote:I will be more specific.
Absolutely no to Whittier.
As for Chapman, less than 40% of their graduates had long term legal jobs.
You will regret either of these choices for the rest of your life.
While not ideal, Chapman is better than Whittier.
Rags to Riches Billionaires
If only I was aware that the key to being a billionaire was being poor.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
You should be worried about employment prospects. That should be the only thing you are worried about. Unless your brother, or somebody else you know, is 100% able to offer you a job at graduation then both of these schools are horrible decisions.ssanders wrote:Lol, aw... c'mon, guys. I'm not too worried about employment prospects.
That aside, though, my brother went to Whittier Law school and is doing fantastic now at a small local firm (he recently became partner). I happen to like the people/campus there as well. Chapman is nice too.
In the end, Whittier offered me a bit of a scholarship, so that makes me more inclined to go that route, but Chapman is obviously a bit higher in the ranking... just not sure of what they have for people interested in technology/IP.
With that said -- I appreciate the reality check, but I really feel confident in myself.... enough to wager a decent chunk of change on it. So... aside from brimstone, any thoughts? =P
-
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:40 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Please state where I gave advice.tedalbany wrote:Stop giving advice. If even one person listens to you, that's one ruined life on your conscience.BearsGrl wrote:Do you know any Chapman graduates? I do. The one that I know is doing just fine. Talked to him weeks ago. He graduated during the brunt of it and it was bad then, but he is doing fine now. He's now in a small practice that he established himself with other individuals.drmguy wrote:I will be more specific.
Absolutely no to Whittier.
As for Chapman, less than 40% of their graduates had long term legal jobs.
You will regret either of these choices for the rest of your life.
While not ideal, Chapman is better than Whittier.
I didn't know that people could listen on the net. I thought people read words on the net. My bad.
-
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Here we go...
-
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:40 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Deleted - Not worth it.
Last edited by BearsGrl on Fri May 04, 2012 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- drmguy
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:43 am
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
It's kind of tragic that most people would read this thread and think that we are all trolling.
- tedalbany
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
Not worth it or you just don't know how to work the quote feature?BearsGrl wrote:Deleted - Not worth it.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
She is:tedalbany wrote:Why? Do you have a guaranteed job? Or do you just have a weird debt and unemployment fetish?ssanders wrote:Lol, aw... c'mon, guys. I'm not too worried about employment prospects.

-
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:40 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
I deleted my post, hence not worth it. But do go on.tedalbany wrote:Not worth it or you just don't know how to work the quote feature?BearsGrl wrote:Deleted - Not worth it.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:40 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
You know that OP is a she?rad lulz wrote:She is:tedalbany wrote:Why? Do you have a guaranteed job? Or do you just have a weird debt and unemployment fetish?ssanders wrote:Lol, aw... c'mon, guys. I'm not too worried about employment prospects.
- tedalbany
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
No, you put your post embedded in the quote, realized this confirms everyone's sneaking suspicion that you don't know how to internet, got embarrassed, then quickly edited it while still maintaining an odd sense of smug superiorityBearsGrl wrote:I deleted my post, hence not worth it. But do go on.tedalbany wrote:Not worth it or you just don't know how to work the quote feature?BearsGrl wrote:Deleted - Not worth it.
- bigeast03
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:21 pm
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
OP- They don't have information on IP because they placed 15 students in firms with more than 25 lawyers in 2010. You can't really do IP as a solo practitioner.
Either option is a terrible financial decision, regardless of cost and debt outlook. Please don't go to either. Retake/reapply if you truly want to do IP law. Find a job and forget law school if you don't want to retake.
Either option is a terrible financial decision, regardless of cost and debt outlook. Please don't go to either. Retake/reapply if you truly want to do IP law. Find a job and forget law school if you don't want to retake.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Whittier vs. Chapman for Intellectual Property
People don't go to shitty schools because of their great analytical reasoning skills.Ludovico Technique wrote:Oh look more anecdotal evidence from BearsGrl! Wow you know ONE Chapman graduate who's doing fine. I guess OP should go there then because of those stats. 100% of graduates known by BearsGrl are now employed! I'm surprised that's not in Chapman's brochureBearsGrl wrote:
Do you know any Chapman graduates? I do. The one that I know is doing just fine. Talked to him weeks ago. He graduated during the brunt of it and it was bad then, but he is doing fine now. He's now in a small practice that he established himself with other individuals.
While not ideal, Chapman is better than Whittier.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login