took the LSAT for the first time Feb10: 170. GPA 3.7 at UCLA. was planning to apply t14 in Sept 2012 for the 2013-2014 cycle, but UCLA invited me to apply in late March and admitted me early April for Fall 2012. would be thrilled, but they offered me no merit $ and no fin aid. zero. when I asked about merit $, Dean S. suggested I send them my competing offers which is odd, because he knows I applied after the cycle closed and don't have any other offers.
did I screw up accepting UCLA's invitation to apply so late in the cycle? if I accept now, I will have to finance full sticker with loans. I had hoped my #s would earn me at least some merit $.
wondering if I should decline and apply to several schools in Sept 2012 as planned? risky to decline and reapply? UCLA is my #1 choice but I can't afford full sticker!
UCLA no$ vs ? Forum
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:58 pm
Re: UCLA no$ vs ?
Not at all risky to decline and reapply. Sounds like they are trying to swindle you out of some $$$. If you apply to UCLA with a 170 and 3.7 in September I can almost guarantee they will give you some $. Make sure to apply to USC / Berk/ T-14, etc so that you have other offers to use in negotiations next cycle.
Definitely wait until next cycle.
Definitely wait until next cycle.
Last edited by bdole2 on Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: UCLA no$ vs ?
Yup.bellol wrote:wondering if I should decline and apply to several schools in Sept 2012 as planned?
- splitbrain
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:38 pm
Re: UCLA no$ vs ?
bk187 wrote:Yup.bellol wrote:wondering if I should decline and apply to several schools in Sept 2012 as planned?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login