Boulder v Fordham Forum
-
xantiro

- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:40 pm
Boulder v Fordham
So here's the deal. I'm an avid rock climber and am interested in envrionmental law. What's the case then to spend the extra few thousand every year to go Fordham?
- Jaeger

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Do you want to live in CO?
- NYC Law

- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 3:33 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Do you want to work in CO or do you want to work in NY?
-
bk1

- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
You want to work in CO? Go to Boulder.
You want to work in NY? Go to Fordham.
You want to work in NY? Go to Fordham.
- 20130312

- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Not necessarily a matter of where you want to live, but rather where you can get a job. I want to work in Miami, but too bad I have absolutely no connection there. You can get a job in places you have ties to. Where do you have ties?
- Sherlock1708

- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:43 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
I would go to Boulder if I were you. Assuming you didn't get scholarship money from either, Boulder will be cheaper. COL is much cheaper and you can get in-state residency after your first year. I have a friend who just finished her JD/MBA at Boulder and LOVED it... profs were awesome, students were all very nice, non-competitive atmosphere, and if you like the outdoors (which I'm assuming you do because you rock climb), there's no better location.
-
CanadianWolf

- Posts: 11465
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Rock climbing & environmental law. Colorado or Fordham ? Tough call. Consider adding a poll to this thread.
- red_owl

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:29 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
I think UC is the choice here for your lifestyle. I don't think the potential job prospects from Fordham (in CO?) outweigh the QOL factors here.
-
Lord Randolph McDuff

- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
red_owl wrote:I think UC is the choice here for your lifestyle. I don't think the potential job prospects from Fordham (in CO?) outweigh the QOL factors here.
If you're "here" then you would know it is CU not UC.
- Perdevise

- Posts: 367
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
FWIW, Paul Campos, who teaches at Boulder, recently said that 20% of every graduating class has no fulltime legal job.
-
bk1

- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
This is true of pretty much every T1.Perdevise wrote:FWIW, Paul Campos, who teaches at Boulder, recently said that 20% of every graduating class has no fulltime legal job.
- johansantana21

- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Yale?bk187 wrote:This is true of pretty much every T1.Perdevise wrote:FWIW, Paul Campos, who teaches at Boulder, recently said that 20% of every graduating class has no fulltime legal job.
- Blindmelon

- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Its true at BU - and therefore, probably true at Fordham as well.bk187 wrote:This is true of pretty much every T1.Perdevise wrote:FWIW, Paul Campos, who teaches at Boulder, recently said that 20% of every graduating class has no fulltime legal job.
- NYC Law

- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 3:33 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
T1 = T30-50 or T18-50johansantana21 wrote:Yale?bk187 wrote:This is true of pretty much every T1.Perdevise wrote:FWIW, Paul Campos, who teaches at Boulder, recently said that 20% of every graduating class has no fulltime legal job.
Have you ever seen someone on TLS say "I go to a T1" who goes to Duke or Columbia?
- johansantana21

- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
I go to a T1.NYC Law wrote:T1 = T30-50 or T18-50johansantana21 wrote:Yale?bk187 wrote:This is true of pretty much every T1.Perdevise wrote:FWIW, Paul Campos, who teaches at Boulder, recently said that 20% of every graduating class has no fulltime legal job.
Have you ever seen someone on TLS say "I go to a T1" who goes to Duke or Columbia?
There you go.
-
bk1

- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
This is what I get when I type "strong regional school" and then decide to erase that in favor "T1."
The irony is that Boulder is actually worse than most other T1's. LST has around 30-40% of Boulder's class failing to get a full time legal job.
The irony is that Boulder is actually worse than most other T1's. LST has around 30-40% of Boulder's class failing to get a full time legal job.
-
Lord Randolph McDuff

- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
You've never been to Boulder/CU Law. Failing is one way to look at it, didn't want a full time legal job is another. TLS culture fail.bk187 wrote:
The irony is that Boulder is actually worse than most other T1's. LST has around 30-40% of Boulder's class failing to get a full time legal job.
I bet CU struggles just as much as every school in its rank/position, but not more.
- 20130312

- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Yes, I would totally go to law school... but not want a full time legal jerb. Srsly.Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:You've never been to Boulder/CU Law. Failing is one way to look at it, didn't want a full time legal job is another. TLS culture fail.bk187 wrote:
The irony is that Boulder is actually worse than most other T1's. LST has around 30-40% of Boulder's class failing to get a full time legal job.
I bet CU struggles just as much as every school in its rank/position, but not more.
- NoleinNY

- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
You say that, but there are always going to be people who go/stay in law school that don't want to be lawyers. Do I think people should spend 3 years and 200k if they don't want to be lawyers? No. But irrational people exist.InGoodFaith wrote:Yes, I would totally go to law school... but not want a full time legal jerb. Srsly.Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:You've never been to Boulder/CU Law. Failing is one way to look at it, didn't want a full time legal job is another. TLS culture fail.bk187 wrote:
The irony is that Boulder is actually worse than most other T1's. LST has around 30-40% of Boulder's class failing to get a full time legal job.
I bet CU struggles just as much as every school in its rank/position, but not more.
-
bne2103

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:55 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
I grew up in NYC and spent a few years living between Vail and Aspen after undergrad. The climbing out there is so goddamn good I practically had to be dragged away from Rifle Mountain Park and forced to get back to 'real life.' With that in mind, I would say go to CU. As long as you are okay with settling down in CO (and why wouldn't you be?) then it seems like a great idea. Chances are if you are an outdoor enthusiast you will just be plain old happier out west. You are making me wish I applied there...I want to go back...xantiro wrote:So here's the deal. I'm an avid rock climber and am interested in envrionmental law. What's the case then to spend the extra few thousand every year to go Fordham?
Where are you living now?
- flem

- Posts: 12882
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Do you know how many trust-fund hippie "want to help people" fart smelling douches exist in the Boulder area?InGoodFaith wrote:Yes, I would totally go to law school... but not want a full time legal jerb. Srsly.Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:You've never been to Boulder/CU Law. Failing is one way to look at it, didn't want a full time legal job is another. TLS culture fail.bk187 wrote:
The irony is that Boulder is actually worse than most other T1's. LST has around 30-40% of Boulder's class failing to get a full time legal job.
I bet CU struggles just as much as every school in its rank/position, but not more.
-
Lord Randolph McDuff

- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
+36tfleming09 wrote:Do you know how many trust-fund hippie "want to help people" fart smelling douches exist in the Boulder area?InGoodFaith wrote:Yes, I would totally go to law school... but not want a full time legal jerb. Srsly.Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:You've never been to Boulder/CU Law. Failing is one way to look at it, didn't want a full time legal job is another. TLS culture fail.bk187 wrote:
The irony is that Boulder is actually worse than most other T1's. LST has around 30-40% of Boulder's class failing to get a full time legal job.
I bet CU struggles just as much as every school in its rank/position, but not more.
The law school had a weed legalizatoin group before it got a criminal prosecution group. I know this because they just got the prosecution group two weeks ago (which means it probably has like three members..) and I've seen emails from the weed group, so I'm assuming it's well established.
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
.
Last edited by rad lulz on Mon Apr 22, 2013 1:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
- LeDique

- Posts: 13462
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: Boulder v Fordham
Ummmmm no. They were approved at the exact same time.Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:
+36
The law school had a weed legalizatoin group before it got a criminal prosecution group. I know this because they just got the prosecution group two weeks ago (which means it probably has like three members..) and I've seen emails from the weed group, so I'm assuming it's well established.
Actually, now that I think about it, the drug policy group is literally a minute older.