IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride) Forum
- ColumbiaChamp

- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
- Nelson

- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
Indiana or Virginia?
- ColumbiaChamp

- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
I don't mind either location. I am more concerned with employment. Indiana ranks higher but everyone trashes it for their employment record but W&L is not a BigLaw heavy hitter either.Nelson wrote:Indiana or Virginia?
- Bronck

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
Dude, neither of them are going to get you biglaw. I would probably go to W&L just because of how awful IU's employment stats are.
- Nelson

- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
The question isn't whether you mind living in either place, it's where you have plausible ties to. If you aren't from either location, why these schools?
- thexfactor

- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
I noticed from your previous posts that you have a 4.0 and 164. If that is the case, I would wait next year and ED to UVA. UVA has a much better chance at biglaw/midlaw/clerkships than WL or IU.
If you had to choose from the two schools, I would choose WL. You will still need top 20% or better to get a good jobfrom WL. However, with that said, even though it is great that you are getting a full ride from WL, what would you have accomplished with 30kdebt 3 years of your life for a job earning less than 40k?
Yes it is true that UVA will require you to take 150k in debt. However, at WL there is a high chance that you woudln't be in the top 20% lucky enough to get a biglaw job. Even if you fail at UVA, with IBR limited to 10% of your income 10% of 40k is only 4k a year for 20 years. The downside at UVA is only slightly lower than at Wash Lee. However, UVA's placement is 2-3x as good as WL.
If you had to choose from the two schools, I would choose WL. You will still need top 20% or better to get a good jobfrom WL. However, with that said, even though it is great that you are getting a full ride from WL, what would you have accomplished with 30kdebt 3 years of your life for a job earning less than 40k?
Yes it is true that UVA will require you to take 150k in debt. However, at WL there is a high chance that you woudln't be in the top 20% lucky enough to get a biglaw job. Even if you fail at UVA, with IBR limited to 10% of your income 10% of 40k is only 4k a year for 20 years. The downside at UVA is only slightly lower than at Wash Lee. However, UVA's placement is 2-3x as good as WL.
- romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
This.Nelson wrote:The question isn't whether you mind living in either place, it's where you have plausible ties to. If you aren't from either location, why these schools?
And this.thexfactor wrote:I noticed from your previous posts that you have a 4.0 and 164. If that is the case, I would wait next year and ED to UVA. UVA has a much better chance at biglaw/midlaw/clerkships than WL or IU.
Oh and this...
romothesavior wrote:Retake, for the love of god. You have a 4.0. Improve your LSAT score 5-6 points and enjoy UChicago.
- ndirish2010

- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
People with 4.0s should never go outside the T10, maybe T6. Please don't go this year.
- ColumbiaChamp

- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
I totally agree that a retake is the most sensible option. I kinda don't want to miss a year though but I am really leaning towards that retake now.
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
There ya goColumbiaChamp wrote:I totally agree that a retake is the most sensible option. I kinda don't want to miss a year though but I am really leaning towards that retake now.
-
bobbyh1919

- Posts: 560
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
So many people would kill for that 4.0 but can't do anything to fix it at this point. Even adding something as little as 3 or 4 points would give you a fantastic shot at the T14, possibly with some money.
- Bronck

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: IU-Bloomington (full-ride) v. W&L (full-ride)
Just retake. You're losing nothing by taking a year off. Nobody has to go to law school right away.ColumbiaChamp wrote:I totally agree that a retake is the most sensible option. I kinda don't want to miss a year though but I am really leaning towards that retake now.