Opinions about Widener Forum
- Philosopher King
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Opinions about Widener
I am going to apply to Widener because my LSAT is so bad (155). Is this a good idea. MY dad's friend is a judge in Philadelphia and he went to Widener.
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 8:08 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
Applying isn't a bad idea, it's the attending that's the issue...Philosopher King wrote:I am going to apply to Widener because my LSAT is so bad (155). Is this a good idea. MY dad's friend is a judge in Philadelphia and he went to Widener.
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:33 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
.
Last edited by justinp on Wed Sep 19, 2012 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Philosopher King
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
I did put some "actual effort" into it. It's a dumb test that means nothing and I'm not going to let it control what I do. Screw LSAC. I can't wait until next cycle to apply, I just can't. Either I go to law school now or never. I have too much dignity to play this sadistic LSAT game with pathetic losers that think it should actually matter for law school admissions. I am going to look into suing LSAC for violating the ADA.justinp wrote:Retake the LSAT. You're not going to get into anywhere worth going with a 155. I guarantee you that you can get a much better score if you put some actual effort into it.Philosopher King wrote:I am going to apply to Widener because my LSAT is so bad (155). Is this a good idea. MY dad's friend is a judge in Philadelphia and he went to Widener.
Widener is a ticket to lifelong debt slavery.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
The latter, then.Philosopher King wrote:Either I go to law school now or never.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
Sounds like a winning plan.Philosopher King wrote: I am going to look into suing LSAC for violating the ADA.
- fundamentallybroken
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:52 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
lol.Philosopher King wrote:I did put some "actual effort" into it. It's a dumb test that means nothing and I'm not going to let it control what I do. Screw LSAC. I can't wait until next cycle to apply, I just can't. Either I go to law school now or never. I have too much dignity to play this sadistic LSAT game with pathetic losers that think it should actually matter for law school admissions. I am going to look into suing LSAC for violating the ADA.justinp wrote:Retake the LSAT. You're not going to get into anywhere worth going with a 155. I guarantee you that you can get a much better score if you put some actual effort into it.Philosopher King wrote:I am going to apply to Widener because my LSAT is so bad (155). Is this a good idea. MY dad's friend is a judge in Philadelphia and he went to Widener.
Widener is a ticket to lifelong debt slavery.
- Philosopher King
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
Well the unjust status quo sure as hell isn't winning anything either. LSAC is breaking the law and I'm going to try to hold them accountable for it.Nelson wrote:Sounds like a winning plan.Philosopher King wrote: I am going to look into suing LSAC for violating the ADA.
- fundamentallybroken
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:52 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
I think you should go start an Occupy LSAC camp. That'll show 'em!Philosopher King wrote:
Well the unjust status quo sure as hell isn't winning anything either. LSAC is breaking the law and I'm going to try to hold them accountable for it.
- Philosopher King
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
Yeah well I actually respected the Occupy cretin more than I do the LSAC people. Unfortunately LSAC gets away with what they do because it's such a small percentage of the population that is victimized. We're not the "99%" exactly, if you know what I mean. Within that small group of victims, almost everyone either agrees with LSAC (some on here want to shower them with presents for the -14 curve for example) or has been conditioned to accept unjust circumstances because they beleive change cannot be affected. But I have the better arguments and that's what's important to me. LSAC couldn't win an argument with me in court.fundamentallybroken wrote:I think you should go start an Occupy LSAC camp. That'll show 'em!Philosopher King wrote:
Well the unjust status quo sure as hell isn't winning anything either. LSAC is breaking the law and I'm going to try to hold them accountable for it.
- MrPapagiorgio
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:36 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
Go on...Philosopher King wrote:]But I have the better arguments and that's what's important to me. LSAC couldn't win an argument with me in court.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:31 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
The chief public defender in my county went to Weidner as well... about three decades ago. There was a time when paying to go to Weidner was a defensible proposition but that time has passed. The people in this thread aren't advising you in the kindest way but they are correct.
It's my "dream" to go to law school too but if I don't get into the right schools with the right amount of money I'm going to have to forgo that dream. It's something everyone applying to law schools would be wise to accept.
I understand it sucks to give up on something you wanted but there are other career options out there for you that you can find fulfillment in. Good luck with everything.
And if you don't want to give up, study and get an amazing score on your retake
It's my "dream" to go to law school too but if I don't get into the right schools with the right amount of money I'm going to have to forgo that dream. It's something everyone applying to law schools would be wise to accept.
I understand it sucks to give up on something you wanted but there are other career options out there for you that you can find fulfillment in. Good luck with everything.
And if you don't want to give up, study and get an amazing score on your retake
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Philosopher King
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
What? With my arguments? I said a lot about this in the Dec. 2011 waiting thread on the last few pages. This thread is about Widener and I really want some opinions about that. I have several different families of arguments against LSAC. The only ones I would ever make in a real court are, of course the legal arguments. See the Dec. 2011 waiting thread for more of my arguments. pp. 491-496 is good.MrPapagiorgio wrote:Go on...Philosopher King wrote:]But I have the better arguments and that's what's important to me. LSAC couldn't win an argument with me in court.
But here is my argument against LSAC about their illegal behavior:
My argument against LSAC is that accommodations must be given in order to counteract a disability and ADA accommodations are not given to give the person an advantage but rather to take away or at least diminish an unfair disadvantage. That's a big difference. On the DRBA website is says that the ADA says that "For a test-taker with sensory, manual or speech impairments, the test provider must ensure that the examination is selected and administered 'so as to best ensure that' the examination results accurately reflect the individual's aptititude or achievement level or whatever other factor the examination purports to measure, rather than reflecting the [disability]." Well, by telling law schools that your test results should be interpreted differently than other test-takers, they are, in effect, making sure that your disability is reflected. What results could possibly reflect a disability more than ones that come with a letter saying to interpret them as lesser than other scores because the person got accommodations to diminish the effect of his or her disability. It's blatantly illegal it seems and the LSAC pinheads think they can get away with it. I would love to change that.
- No13baby
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:42 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
ETA: I really think the 155 is going to be the problem here, not the asterisk indicating you got an accomodated score. Retake or don't go.TommyK wrote:tagged for lolz
Last edited by No13baby on Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cade McNown
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:54 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
Average hefeweizen at best.
- Philosopher King
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
I didn't get accommodations precisely because I was dissuaded by LSAC's illegal practices.No13baby wrote:ETA: I really think the 155 is going to be the problem here, not the asterisk indicating you got an accomodated score. Retake or don't go.TommyK wrote:tagged for lolz
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- No13baby
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:42 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
Well, there's your problem. You know that accomodated scores aren't used to calculate schools' medians, right? If you think you'd do better with an accomodated score, retake with accomodations. Jesus.Philosopher King wrote:I didn't get accommodations precisely because I was dissuaded by LSAC's illegal practices.No13baby wrote:ETA: I really think the 155 is going to be the problem here, not the asterisk indicating you got an accomodated score. Retake or don't go.TommyK wrote:tagged for lolz
- Philosopher King
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
This is good information. If this is true then my case against LSAC is strengthened greatly.No13baby wrote:Well, there's your problem. You know that accomodated [sic] scores aren't used to calculate schools' medians, right? If you think you'd do better with an accomodated [sic] score, retake with accomodations [sic]. Jesus.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
You're an uninteresting troll. Strive harder.Philosopher King wrote:This is good information. If this is true then my case against LSAC is strengthened greatly.No13baby wrote:Well, there's your problem. You know that accomodated [sic] scores aren't used to calculate schools' medians, right? If you think you'd do better with an accomodated [sic] score, retake with accomodations [sic]. Jesus.
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:33 am
Re: Opinions about Widener
.
Last edited by justinp on Wed Sep 19, 2012 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Philosopher King
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
What do you mean? Why are people saying I'm a troll?justinp wrote:Is trolling? Or is serious?Philosopher King wrote:I did put some "actual effort" into it. It's a dumb test that means nothing and I'm not going to let it control what I do. Screw LSAC. I can't wait until next cycle to apply, I just can't. Either I go to law school now or never. I have too much dignity to play this sadistic LSAT game with pathetic losers that think it should actually matter for law school admissions. I am going to look into suing LSAC for violating the ADA.justinp wrote:Retake the LSAT. You're not going to get into anywhere worth going with a 155. I guarantee you that you can get a much better score if you put some actual effort into it.Philosopher King wrote:I am going to apply to Widener because my LSAT is so bad (155). Is this a good idea. MY dad's friend is a judge in Philadelphia and he went to Widener.
Widener is a ticket to lifelong debt slavery.
- sach1282
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:50 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
--ImageRemoved--Philosopher King wrote: I did put some "actual effort" into it. It's a dumb test that means nothing and I'm not going to let it control what I do. Screw LSAC. I can't wait until next cycle to apply, I just can't. Either I go to law school now or never. I have too much dignity to play this sadistic LSAT game with pathetic losers that think it should actually matter for law school admissions. I am going to look into suing LSAC for violating the ADA.
But seriously, don't go to Widener. If you really have a disability, test with accommodations. You can't complain until you actually apply and get denied. Even if you actually were going to sue LSAC, which would hardly be the first time someone tried this, there's something known as the "case or controversy" requirement. It means unless you actually did apply for accommodations and get denied, you wouldn't even have standing to sue.
- ggibelli
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:12 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
If you plan on working in Delaware and can get a scholarship then it isn't a bad choice. But Widener isn't going much further than Delaware and Philadelphia. Nonetheless it is very expensive (36k) a year and without a sizeable scholarship I would advice against it. You can certainly do well coming from Widener but you're going to need to do well with your grades. My advice would be to take the time to retake and put the effort into studying because the LSAT is the only thing you can control right now. Why risk it on the hopes of getting top grades when you can put that effort into the LSAT for June or February. I sat out a year and was pretty much in your exact shoes last year. I was going to attend Widener at full sticker and thought better of it. Retook in October and received a 20k/year scholarship. Unless I end up negotiating a full ride, I doubt I will end up there but waiting a year has only benefited me and I recommend you don't rush into law school without a solid game plan.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:33 pm
Re: Opinions about Widener
Some advice from a 1L at Widener. I would start by disregarding the form posts of, T4 and $ XXX,XXX of debt. Make the choice that is the best for you, irrespective of the opinions of anonymous internet posters. Feel free to PM me if you have any questions.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login