Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw Forum
- hume85

- Posts: 675
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:38 pm
Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Suppose one is accepted into all three schools, and these are the highest ranked schools into which one is accepted. Which of the three would provide the best opportunity for securing a job doing biglaw corporate work in NYC? Thank you in advance.
- 20130312

- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
I would say Penn, just for the accessibility to the actual market you want to practice in (Philly -> NYC is a 2 hour drive). NY firms probably come down to Penn in droves for OCI.
Regardless, congrats on the great school options. You should be just as well off at any of them.
Regardless, congrats on the great school options. You should be just as well off at any of them.
- IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
They're going to be very, very, VERY similar. This decision should probably be made based on cost, personal preferences and your feelings about UVA's pre-select system.
-
005618502

- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Actually dont know much about this, what would you say are the positive and negatives to this?IAFG wrote:They're going to be very, very, VERY similar. This decision should probably be made based on cost, personal preferences and your feelings about UVA's pre-select system.
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Searching for the UVA 2011 OCI thread should give you all the info on the whole saga this year.AssumptionRequired wrote:Actually dont know much about this, what would you say are the positive and negatives to this?IAFG wrote:They're going to be very, very, VERY similar. This decision should probably be made based on cost, personal preferences and your feelings about UVA's pre-select system.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
005618502

- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
The school picked between these should basically be based on $ and preference. If all are at sticker look at COL and which enviornment you would do best inhume85 wrote:Suppose one is accepted into all three schools, and these are the highest ranked schools into which one is accepted. Which of the three would provide the best opportunity for securing a job doing biglaw corporate work in NYC? Thank you in advance.
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
No.hume85 wrote:Suppose
- IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
I think pre-selects seriously burn people who could use a few interviews to get into the "groove" and adjust to legal hiring interviews, which are definitely different than typical interviews. I did nearly 40 interviews at OCI, and I was glad to have the practice. Under a pre-select system, you might only get a handful of screeners. That's not much margin for error.AssumptionRequired wrote:Actually dont know much about this, what would you say are the positive and negatives to this?IAFG wrote:They're going to be very, very, VERY similar. This decision should probably be made based on cost, personal preferences and your feelings about UVA's pre-select system.
There's debate about whether you can turn what would have been a ding at the pre-select stage into a CB on the powers of your screener alone. Firms don't seem to be homogenous to me in how they make hiring decisions, so I have to assume some firms are just going to straight ding you if they would not have pre-selected you, and others are more holistic. To me, that seems to mean that for the majority of the class (the bottom 3/4s or so) lottery system gives them at least a slightly better shot at a job.
- quakeroats

- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
-
005618502

- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
40 is a lot... isnt it? Doesnt UVA also have a partial lottery?IAFG wrote:I think pre-selects seriously burn people who could use a few interviews to get into the "groove" and adjust to legal hiring interviews, which are definitely different than typical interviews. I did nearly 40 interviews at OCI, and I was glad to have the practice. Under a pre-select system, you might only get a handful of screeners. That's not much margin for error.AssumptionRequired wrote:Actually dont know much about this, what would you say are the positive and negatives to this?IAFG wrote:They're going to be very, very, VERY similar. This decision should probably be made based on cost, personal preferences and your feelings about UVA's pre-select system.
There's debate about whether you can turn what would have been a ding at the pre-select stage into a CB on the powers of your screener alone. Firms don't seem to be homogenous to me in how they make hiring decisions, so I have to assume some firms are just going to straight ding you if they would not have pre-selected you, and others are more holistic. To me, that seems to mean that for the majority of the class (the bottom 3/4s or so) lottery system gives them at least a slightly better shot at a job.
Is there any benefit to the pre select besides not wasting the firm/students time? Because I am with you, I feel like once I am in the interview my chances of getting the job go up greatly, if the firm is even looking after seeing my grades
- IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
this is, of course, nonsensequakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
-
005618502

- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Why are you such a troll? Duke wasnt in the options, and no it does not place better than UVA or Michiganquakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
-
005618502

- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Most of his posts areIAFG wrote:this is, of course, nonsensequakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Some people have said they feel more confident in pre-selected interviews.AssumptionRequired wrote: 40 is a lot... isnt it? Doesnt UVA also have a partial lottery?
Is there any benefit to the pre select besides not wasting the firm/students time? Because I am with you, I feel like once I am in the interview my chances of getting the job go up greatly, if the firm is even looking after seeing my grades
- quakeroats

- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
In New York, in this economy it certainly does. Having twice as many students to place at Michigan and Virginia is a serious liability.AssumptionRequired wrote:Why are you such a troll? Duke wasnt in the options, and no it does not place better than UVA or Michiganquakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
-
005618502

- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Its all about class rank. I would rather be ranked NUMBER 40 in my class at UVA/Mich than at Duke. But no one cares about that, its about rank and the curve. There are to many NYC firms to say that UVA/Mich kids are solely hurting each otherquakeroats wrote:In New York, in this economy it certainly does. Having twice as many students to place at Michigan and Virginia is a serious liability.AssumptionRequired wrote:Why are you such a troll? Duke wasnt in the options, and no it does not place better than UVA or Michiganquakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
- johansantana21

- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
It does seem like smaller class sizes are helping out recently.quakeroats wrote:In New York, in this economy it certainly does. Having twice as many students to place at Michigan and Virginia is a serious liability.AssumptionRequired wrote:Why are you such a troll? Duke wasnt in the options, and no it does not place better than UVA or Michiganquakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Basis? Smaller classes seem to lead to greater fluctuations in the hiring stats.johansantana21 wrote:It does seem like smaller class sizes are helping out recently.quakeroats wrote:In New York, in this economy it certainly does. Having twice as many students to place at Michigan and Virginia is a serious liability.AssumptionRequired wrote:Why are you such a troll? Duke wasnt in the options, and no it does not place better than UVA or Michiganquakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
It's true that firms like to collect a few students from all the top schools, but firms aren't going to go deeper into Duke then they would have otherwise just to grab a Duke kid.
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
+1, loltrollIAFG wrote:this is, of course, nonsensequakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
Penn is possibly slightly better than the others and I would personally take M over V because of the shitshow at OCI this year
- Veyron

- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
I dunno about M and V but we did pretty good this year.
- JusticeHarlan

- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
PSA: quakeroats once tried to show Duke was better than UVA for top DC firms by looking at alums in firms in the V10 (including WLRK, CSM, etc. that don't even have DC offices).AssumptionRequired wrote:Most of his posts areIAFG wrote:this is, of course, nonsensequakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- quakeroats

- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
I did something like that, but always after giving a disclaimer. The only thing I did (and still) stand behind is the New York numbers.JusticeHarlan wrote:PSA: quakeroats once tried to show Duke was better than UVA for top DC firms by looking at alums in firms in the V10 (including WLRK, CSM, etc. that don't even have DC offices).AssumptionRequired wrote:Most of his posts areIAFG wrote:this is, of course, nonsensequakeroats wrote:Penn then Duke then Virginia then a drop off then Michigan.
- BiglawOrBust

- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:11 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Is that a selftar, quakeroats?
-
chicagohopeful

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:20 pm
- BiglawOrBust

- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:11 pm
Re: Michigan vs Penn vs UVA for NYC Biglaw
Dallas Fort Worth?chicagohopeful wrote:DFW FTW
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login